The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Bark functional ecology: evidence for tradeoffs, functional coordination, and environment producing bark diversity
Abstract
Summary: The causes underlying bark diversity are unclear. Variation has been frequently attributed to environmental differences across sites. However, variation may also result from tradeoffs and coordination between bark's multiple functions. Bark traits may also covary with wood and leaf traits as part of major dimensions of plant variation. To assess hypotheses regarding tradeoffs and functional coordination, we measured bark traits reflecting protection, storage, mechanics, and photosynthesis in branches of 90 species spanning a wide phylogenetic and environmental range. We also tested associations between bark, wood, and leaf traits. We partitioned trait variation within species, and within and across communities to quantify variation associated with across‐site differences. We observed associations between bark mechanics and storage, density and thickness, and thickness and photosynthetic activity. Increasing bark thickness contributed significantly to stiffer stems and greater water storage. Bark density, water content, and mechanics covaried strongly with the equivalent wood traits, and to a lesser degree with leaf size, xylem conductivity, and vessel diameter. Most variation was observed within sites and had low phylogenetic signal. Compared with relatively minor across‐site differences, tradeoffs and coordination among functions of bark, leaves, and wood are likely to be major and overlooked factors shaping bark ecology and evolution.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Experimental Design and Data Analysis for Biologists
Quinn, G. P., & Keough, M. J. (2002) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511806384 · Cited by 10,674 · cited 1×
“We fitted a nested ANOVA with random effects and calculated its variance components (Quinn & Keough, 2002).”
MethodFire as an evolutionary pressure shaping plant traits
Keeley, J. E., Pausas, J. G., Rundel, P. W., Bond, W. J., & Bradstock, R. A. (2011) · Trends in Plant Science · doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2011.04.002 · Cited by 1,176
Cited by
TRY plant trait database – enhanced coverage and open access
Kattge, J., Bönisch, G., Díaz, S., Lavorel, S., Prentice, I. C., Leadley, P., Tautenhahn, S., Werner, G. D. A., Aakala, T., Abedi, M., et al. (2020) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/gcb.14904 · Cited by 2,089
Self-citationBark thickness and fire regime
Pausas, J. G. (2015) · Functional Ecology · doi:10.1111/1365-2435.12372 · Cited by 444
Tree diversity increases decadal forest soil carbon and nitrogen accrual
Chen, X., Taylor, A. R., Reich, P. B., Hisano, M., Chen, H. Y. H., & Chang, S. X. (2023) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-023-05941-9 · Cited by 283
Thinner bark increases sensitivity of wetter Amazonian tropical forests to fire
Staver, A. C., Brando, P. M., Barlow, J., Morton, D. C., Paine, C. E. T., Malhi, Y., Araujo Murakami, A., & del Aguila Pasquel, J. (2020) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/ele.13409 · Cited by 61
Metadata
- Authors
- Rosell, J. A., Gleason, S., Méndez‐Alonzo, R., Chang, Y., & Westoby, M.
- Venue
- New Phytologist
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2013-10-07
- Volume
- 201
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 486-497
- ISSN
- 0028-646X (ISSN-L)
- 1469-8137
- OpenAlex
- W2139155232
- Cited by
- 228
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 7.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Bark functional ecology: evidence for tradeoffs, functional coordination, and environment producing bark diversity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/nph.12541
- The paper
- Rosell, J. A., Gleason, S., Méndez‐Alonzo, R., Chang, Y., & Westoby, M. (2014). Bark functional ecology: evidence for tradeoffs, functional coordination, and environment producing bark diversity. New Phytologist. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.12541
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.