The DOI matches its Crossref record; 120 of the 120 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Bark thickness and fire regime
Abstract
Summary: Bark is a vital and very visible part of woody plants, yet only recently has bark characteristics started to be considered as key traits structuring communities and biomes. Bark thickness is very variable among woody plants, and I hypothesize that fire is a key factor selecting for a thick bark, and thus, at the global scale, a significant proportion of the variability in bark thickness is explained by the variability in fire regimes. Previous research has focused on the importance of bark thickness mainly in surface‐fire regimes; here I generalize this idea and present a conceptual framework to explain how the different drivers that affect fire intensity have shaped bark thickness, in conjunction with other plant traits. I first review methods used to study bark thickness and then provide examples of bark thickness patterns from a wide range of ecosystems subject to different fire regimes (understorey fires, grass‐fuelled surface fires, grass‐fuelled crown fires and infrequent fires). There are some fire regimes that select for thick barks, while some only in the base of the trunk (e.g. understorey fires), others select for a thick bark on the whole plant (e.g. grass‐fuelled crown fires). There are also fire regimes in which allocating resources to a thick bark is not adaptive (e.g. woody‐fulled crown fires). Fire regime can explain a large proportion of the variability of bark thickness at the global scale, and thus, this trait varies across ecosystems in a predictable manner; however, the current paucity of data limits a fully accurate analysis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The worldwide leaf economics spectrum
Wright, I. J., Reich, P. B., Westoby, M., Ackerly, D. D., Baruch, Z., Bongers, F., Cavender-Bares, J., Chapin, T., Cornelissen, J. H. C., Diemer, M., et al. (2004) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02403 · Cited by 9,021
New handbook for standardised measurement of plant functional traits worldwide
Pérez-Harguindeguy, N., Díaz, S., Garnier, E., Lavorel, S., Poorter, H., Jaureguiberry, P., Bret-Harte, M. S., Cornwell, W. K., Craine, J. M., Gurvich, D. E., et al. (2013) · Australian Journal of Botany · doi:10.1071/bt12225 · Cited by 4,240
Self-citationA handbook of protocols for standardised and easy measurement of plant functional traits worldwide
Cornelissen, J. H. C., Lavorel, S., Garnier, E., Díaz, S., Buchmann, N., Gurvich, D. E., Reich, P. B., Steege, H. T., Morgan, H. D., Heijden, M. G. A. V. D., et al. (2003) · Australian Journal of Botany · doi:10.1071/bt02124 · Cited by 4,079
Self-citationTRY – a global database of plant traits
KATTGE, J., DÍAZ, S., LAVOREL, S., PRENTICE, I. C., LEADLEY, P., BÖNISCH, G., GARNIER, E., WESTOBY, M., REICH, P. B., WRIGHT, I. J., et al. (2011) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02451.x · Cited by 2,638
Self-citationAssessing the generality of global leaf trait relationships
Wright, I. J., Reich, P. B., Cornelissen, J. H. C., Falster, D. S., Garnier, E., Hikosaka, K., Lamont, B. B., Lee, W., Oleksyn, J., Osada, N., et al. (2005) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2005.01349.x · Cited by 2,598
Bivariate line‐fitting methods for allometry
Warton, D. I., Wright, I. J., Falster, D. S., & Westoby, M. (2006) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1017/s1464793106007007 · Cited by 2,319
The global distribution of ecosystems in a world without fire
Bond, W. J., Woodward, F. I., & Midgley, G. F. (2005) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2004.01252.x · Cited by 1,942
Effects of Invasive Alien Plants on Fire Regimes
BROOKS, M. L., D'ANTONIO, C. M., RICHARDSON, D. M., GRACE, J. B., KEELEY, J. E., DiTOMASO, J. M., HOBBS, R. J., PELLANT, M., & PYKE, D. (2004) · BioScience · doi:10.1641/0006-3568(2004)054[0677:eoiapo]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 1,634
Ecology and Biogeography of Pinus
Fisher, R. F. (2001) · Forest Ecology and Management · doi:10.1016/s0378-1127(00)00598-3 · Cited by 1,328
The Demise of Fire and “Mesophication” of Forests in the Eastern United States
Nowacki, G. J., & Abrams, M. D. (2008) · BioScience · doi:10.1641/b580207 · Cited by 1,316
Cited by
Fire as a key driver of Earth's biodiversity
He, T., Lamont, B. B., & Pausas, J. G. (2019) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1111/brv.12544 · Cited by 623
Self-citationUnearthing belowground bud banks in fire‐prone ecosystems
Pausas, J. G., Lamont, B. B., Paula, S., Appezzato‐da‐Glória, B., & Fidelis, A. (2018) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/nph.14982 · Cited by 409
Self-citationTowards understanding resprouting at the global scale
Pausas, J. G., Pratt, R. B., Keeley, J. E., Jacobsen, A. L., Ramirez, A. R., Vilagrosa, A., Paula, S., Kaneakua‐Pia, I. N., & Davis, S. D. (2016) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/nph.13644 · Cited by 311
Self-citationTowards an understanding of the evolutionary role of fire in animals
Pausas, J. G., & Parr, C. L. (2018) · Evolutionary Ecology · doi:10.1007/s10682-018-9927-6 · Cited by 267
Self-citationFire and tree death: understanding and improving modeling of fire-induced tree mortality
Hood, S. M., Varner, J. M., van Mantgem, P., & Cansler, C. A. (2018) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/aae934 · Cited by 258
Metadata
- Authors
- Pausas, J. G.
- Venue
- Functional Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2014-11-26
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 315-327
- ISSN
- 0269-8463 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2435
- OpenAlex
- W2105570511
- Cited by
- 444
- References
- 120
- FWCI
- 20.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Bark thickness and fire regime. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/1365-2435.12372
- The paper
- Pausas, J. G. (2015). Bark thickness and fire regime. Functional Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.12372
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
