The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
An integrated model of stomatal development and leaf physiology
Open accessAbstract
Summary: Stomatal conductance (gs) is constrained by the size and number of stomata on the plant epidermis, and the potential maximum rate of gs can be calculated based on these stomatal traits (Anatomical gsmax). However, the relationship between Anatomical gsmax and operational gs under atmospheric conditions remains undefined. Leaf‐level gas‐exchange measurements were performed for six Arabidopsis thaliana genotypes that have different Anatomical gsmax profiles resulting from mutations or transgene activity in stomatal development. We found that Anatomical gsmax was an accurate prediction of gs under gas‐exchange conditions that maximized stomatal opening, namely high‐intensity light, low [CO2], and high relative humidity. Plants with different Anatomical gsmax had quantitatively similar responses to increasing [CO2] when gs was scaled to Anatomical gsmax. This latter relationship allowed us to produce and test an empirical model derived from the Ball–Woodrow–Berry equation that estimates gs as a function of Anatomical gsmax, relative humidity, and [CO2] at the leaf. The capacity to predict operational gs via Anatomical gsmax and the pore‐specific short‐term response to [CO2] demonstrates a precise link between stomatal development and leaf physiology. This connection should be useful to quantify the gas flux of plants in past, present, and future CO2 regimes based upon the anatomical features of stomata.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A biochemical model of photosynthetic CO2 assimilation in leaves of C3 species
Farquhar, G. D., von Caemmerer, S., & Berry, J. A. (1980) · Planta · doi:10.1007/bf00386231 · Cited by 8,796
Self-citationGlobal CO 2 rise leads to reduced maximum stomatal conductance in Florida vegetation
Lammertsma, E. I., Boer, H. J. D., Dekker, S. C., Dilcher, D. L., Lotter, A. F., & Wagner-Cremer, F. (2011) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1100371108 · Cited by 259
Cited by
Impact of stomatal density and morphology on water-use efficiency in a changing world
Bertolino, L. T., Caine, R. S., & Gray, J. E. (2019) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2019.00225 · Cited by 706
Caine, R. S., Yin, X., Sloan, J., Harrison, E. L., Mohammed, U., Fulton, T., Biswal, A. K., Dionora, J., Chater, C. C., Coe, R. A., et al. (2019) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/nph.15344 · Cited by 561
Increasing water‐use efficiency directly through genetic manipulation of stomatal density
Franks, P. J., W. Doheny‐Adams, T., Britton‐Harper, Z. J., & Gray, J. E. (2015) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/nph.13347 · Cited by 391
The influence of stomatal morphology and distribution on photosynthetic gas exchange
Harrison, E. L., Arce Cubas, L., Gray, J. E., & Hepworth, C. (2020) · The Plant Journal · doi:10.1111/tpj.14560 · Cited by 292
Metadata
- Authors
- Dow, G. J., Bergmann, D. C., & Berry, J. A.
- Venue
- New Phytologist
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2013-11-19
- Volume
- 201
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1218-1226
- ISSN
- 0028-646X (ISSN-L)
- 1469-8137
- OpenAlex
- W2041177672
- Cited by
- 189
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 12.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An integrated model of stomatal development and leaf physiology. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/nph.12608
- The paper
- Dow, G. J., Bergmann, D. C., & Berry, J. A. (2014). An integrated model of stomatal development and leaf physiology. New Phytologist. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.12608
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.