Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 366

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 144 of the 144 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The unseen iceberg: plant roots in arctic tundra

Open access
Iversen, Colleen M., Sloan, Victoria L., Sullivan, Patrick F., Euskirchen, Eugenie S., McGuire, A. David, Norby, Richard J., Walker, Anthony P., Warren, Jeffrey M., Wullschleger, Stan D.·2015·New Phytologist

Abstract

Summary: Plant roots play a critical role in ecosystem function in arctic tundra, but root dynamics in these ecosystems are poorly understood. To address this knowledge gap, we synthesized available literature on tundra roots, including their distribution, dynamics and contribution to ecosystem carbon and nutrient fluxes, and highlighted key aspects of their representation in terrestrial biosphere models. Across all tundra ecosystems, belowground plant biomass exceeded aboveground biomass, with the exception of polar desert tundra. Roots were shallowly distributed in the thin layer of soil that thaws annually, and were often found in surface organic soil horizons. Root traits – including distribution, chemistry, anatomy and resource partitioning – play an important role in controlling plant species competition, and therefore ecosystem carbon and nutrient fluxes, under changing climatic conditions, but have only been quantified for a small fraction of tundra plants. Further, the annual production and mortality of fine roots are key components of ecosystem processes in tundra, but extant data are sparse. Tundra root traits and dynamics should be the focus of future research efforts. Better representation of the dynamics and characteristics of tundra roots will improve the utility of models for the evaluation of the responses of tundra ecosystems to changing environmental conditions. Contents Summary 34 I. Arctic tundra and plant roots: an introduction 35 II. A comprehensive literature review 35 III. A brief history of fine‐root studies in tundra ecosystems 41 IV. Distribution and dynamics of tundra plant roots: current knowledge and future directions 43 V. Contribution of living plant roots to fluxes of CO 2 and CH 4 from tundra ecosystems to the atmosphere 49 VI. The role of fine roots in tundra ecosystem nutrient cycling 50 VII. Opportunities for improving the representation of root processes in arctic models 51 VIII. Conclusions and priorities for future research 52 Acknowledgements 53 References 53

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/nph.13003

Cites

144 of 144 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 144 references

Cited by

See all 366

Metadata

Authors
Iversen, C. M., Sloan, V. L., Sullivan, P. F., Euskirchen, E. S., McGuire, A. D., Norby, R. J., Walker, A. P., Warren, J. M., & Wullschleger, S. D.
Venue
New Phytologist
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-09-10
Volume
205
Issue
1
Pages
34-58
ISSN
  • 0028-646X (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-8137
OpenAlex
W2152971289
Cited by
366
References
144
FWCI
13.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The unseen iceberg: plant roots in arctic tundra. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/nph.13003
The paper
Iversen, C. M., Sloan, V. L., Sullivan, P. F., Euskirchen, E. S., McGuire, A. D., Norby, R. J., Walker, A. P., Warren, J. M., & Wullschleger, S. D. (2015). The unseen iceberg: plant roots in arctic tundra. New Phytologist. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.13003

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.