The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Changes in fungal communities along a boreal forest soil fertility gradient
Open accessAbstract
Summary: Boreal forests harbour diverse fungal communities with decisive roles in decomposition and plant nutrition. Although changes in boreal plant communities along gradients in soil acidity and nitrogen (N) availability are well described, less is known about how fungal taxonomic and functional groups respond to soil fertility factors. We analysed fungal communities in humus and litter from 25 Swedish old‐growth forests, ranging from N‐rich Picea abies stands to acidic and N‐poor Pinus sylvestris stands. 454‐pyrosequencing of ITS 2 amplicons was used to analyse community composition, and biomass was estimated by ergosterol analysis. Fungal community composition was significantly related to soil fertility at the levels of species, genera/orders and functional groups. Ascomycetes dominated in less fertile forests, whereas basidiomycetes increased in abundance in more fertile forests, both in litter and humus. The relative abundance of mycorrhizal fungi in the humus layer remained high even in the most fertile soils. Tolerance to acidity and nitrogen deficiency seems to be of greater importance than plant carbon (C) allocation patterns in determining responses of fungal communities to soil fertility, in old‐growth boreal forests.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The worldwide leaf economics spectrum
Wright, I. J., Reich, P. B., Westoby, M., Ackerly, D. D., Baruch, Z., Bongers, F., Cavender-Bares, J., Chapin, T., Cornelissen, J. H. C., Diemer, M., et al. (2004) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02403 · Cited by 9,021
Grime, J. P. (1977) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/283244 · Cited by 5,754
Cited by
Dimensions of biodiversity in the Earth mycobiome
Peay, K. G., Kennedy, P. G., & Talbot, J. M. (2016) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro.2016.59 · Cited by 721
Forest microbiome: diversity, complexity and dynamics
Baldrian, P. (2016) · FEMS Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1093/femsre/fuw040 · Cited by 710
Fernandez, C. W., & Kennedy, P. G. (2016) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/nph.13648 · Cited by 532
Chen, Y.-L., Xu, T.-L., Veresoglou, S. D., Hu, H.-W., Hao, Z.-P., Hu, Y.-J., Liu, L., Deng, Y., Rillig, M. C., & Chen, B.-D. (2017) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2017.02.015 · Cited by 299
Metadata
- Authors
- Sterkenburg, E., Bahr, A., Brandström Durling, M., Clemmensen, K. E., & Lindahl, B. D.
- Venue
- New Phytologist
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2015-05-07
- Volume
- 207
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1145-1158
- ISSN
- 0028-646X (ISSN-L)
- 1469-8137
- OpenAlex
- W2122814689
- Cited by
- 394
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 23.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Changes in fungal communities along a boreal forest soil fertility gradient. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/nph.13426
- The paper
- Sterkenburg, E., Bahr, A., Brandström Durling, M., Clemmensen, K. E., & Lindahl, B. D. (2015). Changes in fungal communities along a boreal forest soil fertility gradient. New Phytologist. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.13426
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.