The DOI matches its Crossref record; 47 of the 47 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Towards understanding resprouting at the global scale
Open accessAbstract
Summary: Understanding and predicting plant response to disturbance is of paramount importance in our changing world. Resprouting ability is often considered a simple qualitative trait and used in many ecological studies. Our aim is to show some of the complexities of resprouting while highlighting cautions that need be taken in using resprouting ability to predict vegetation responses across disturbance types and biomes. There are marked differences in resprouting depending on the disturbance type, and fire is often the most severe disturbance because it includes both defoliation and lethal temperatures. In the Mediterranean biome, there are differences in functional strategies to cope with water deficit between resprouters (dehydration avoiders) and nonresprouters (dehydration tolerators); however, there is little research to unambiguously extrapolate these results to other biomes. Furthermore, predictions of vegetation responses to changes in disturbance regimes require consideration not only of resprouting, but also other relevant traits (e.g. seeding, bark thickness) and the different correlations among traits observed in different biomes; models lacking these details would behave poorly at the global scale. Overall, the lessons learned from a given disturbance regime and biome (e.g. crown‐fire Mediterranean ecosystems) can guide research in other ecosystems but should not be extrapolated at the global scale.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
McDowell, N., Pockman, W. T., Allen, C. D., Breshears, D. D., Cobb, N., Kolb, T., Plaut, J., Sperry, J., West, A., Williams, D. G., et al. (2008) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02436.x · Cited by 4,472
Fire as an evolutionary pressure shaping plant traits
Keeley, J. E., Pausas, J. G., Rundel, P. W., Bond, W. J., & Bradstock, R. A. (2011) · Trends in Plant Science · doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2011.04.002 · Cited by 1,176
Self-citationGill, A. M., Groves, R. H., & Noble, I. R. (1981) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 1,126
Clarke, P. J., Lawes, M. J., Midgley, J. J., Lamont, B. B., Ojeda, F., Burrows, G. E., Enright, N. J., & Knox, K. J. E. (2013) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/nph.12001 · Cited by 953
Resprouting as a life history strategy in woody plant communities
Bellingham, P. J., & Sparrow, A. D. (2000) · Oikos · doi:10.1034/j.1600-0706.2000.890224.x · Cited by 773
PLANT FUNCTIONAL TRAITS IN RELATION TO FIRE IN CROWN-FIRE ECOSYSTEMS
Pausas, J. G., Bradstock, R. A., Keith, D. A., & Keeley, J. E. (2004) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/02-4094 · Cited by 746
Self-citationEvolutionary ecology of resprouting and seeding in fire‐prone ecosystems
Pausas, J. G., & Keeley, J. E. (2014) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/nph.12921 · Cited by 683
Self-citationFUNCTIONAL STRATEGIES OF CHAPARRAL SHRUBS IN RELATION TO SEASONAL WATER DEFICIT AND DISTURBANCE
Ackerly, D. (2004) · Ecological Monographs · doi:10.1890/03-4022 · Cited by 544
Drought survival of tropical tree seedlings enhanced by non-structural carbohydrate levels
O’Brien, M. J., Leuzinger, S., Philipson, C. D., Tay, J., & Hector, A. (2014) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/nclimate2281 · Cited by 516
Fire in Mediterranean Ecosystems: Ecology, Evolution and Management
Keeley, J. E., Bond, W. J., Bradstock, R. A., Pausas, J. G., & Rundel, P. W. (2011) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139033091 · Cited by 479
Self-citation
Cited by
TRY plant trait database – enhanced coverage and open access
Kattge, J., Bönisch, G., Díaz, S., Lavorel, S., Prentice, I. C., Leadley, P., Tautenhahn, S., Werner, G. D. A., Aakala, T., Abedi, M., et al. (2020) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/gcb.14904 · Cited by 2,089
Self-citationPlant xylem hydraulics: What we understand, current research, and future challenges
Venturas, M. D., Sperry, J. S., & Hacke, U. G. (2017) · Journal of Integrative Plant Biology · doi:10.1111/jipb.12534 · Cited by 487
Unearthing belowground bud banks in fire‐prone ecosystems
Pausas, J. G., Lamont, B. B., Paula, S., Appezzato‐da‐Glória, B., & Fidelis, A. (2018) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/nph.14982 · Cited by 409
Self-citationFire and tree death: understanding and improving modeling of fire-induced tree mortality
Hood, S. M., Varner, J. M., van Mantgem, P., & Cansler, C. A. (2018) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/aae934 · Cited by 258
Morphological, physiochemical and antioxidant responses of Maclura pomifera to drought stress
Khaleghi, A., Naderi, R., Brunetti, C., Maserti, B. E., Salami, S. A., & Babalar, M. (2019) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-019-55889-y · Cited by 253
Metadata
- Authors
- Pausas, J. G., Pratt, R. B., Keeley, J. E., Jacobsen, A. L., Ramirez, A. R., Vilagrosa, A., Paula, S., Kaneakua‐Pia, I. N., & Davis, S. D.
- Venue
- New Phytologist
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2015-10-07
- Volume
- 209
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 945-954
- ISSN
- 0028-646X (ISSN-L)
- 1469-8137
- OpenAlex
- W1901348763
- Cited by
- 311
- References
- 47
- FWCI
- 16.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Towards understanding resprouting at the global scale. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/nph.13644
- The paper
- Pausas, J. G., Pratt, R. B., Keeley, J. E., Jacobsen, A. L., Ramirez, A. R., Vilagrosa, A., Paula, S., Kaneakua‐Pia, I. N., & Davis, S. D. (2016). Towards understanding resprouting at the global scale. New Phytologist. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.13644
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
