Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 164

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Genome‐wide analysis of coding and non‐coding RNA reveals a conserved miR164‐NAC regulatory pathway for fruit ripening

Wang, Wen‐qiu, Wang, Jian, Wu, Ying‐ying, Li, Da‐wei, Allan, Andrew C., Yin, Xue‐ren·2020·New Phytologist

Abstract

Summary: Kiwifruit (Actinidia spp.) is a climacteric fruit with high sensitivity to ethylene, influenced by multiple ethylene‐responsive structural genes and transcription factors. However, the roles of other post‐transcriptional regulators (e.g. miRNAs) necessary for ripening remain elusive. High‐throughput sequencing sRNAome, degradome and transcriptome methods were used to identify further contributors to ripening control in the kiwifruit (A. deliciosa cv ‘Hayward’). Two NAM/ATAF/CUC domain transcription factors (AdNAC6 and AdNAC7), both predicted targets for miR164, showed significant upregulation by exogenous ethylene. Gene expression analysis and luciferase reporter assays indicated that Ade‐miR164 and one of its precursor miRNAs (Ade‐MIR164b) were repressed by ethylene treatment and negatively correlated with AdNAC6/7 expression. Subsequent analysis indicated that both AdNAC6 and AdNAC7 proteins are transcriptional activators and physically bind the promoters of AdACS1 (1‐aminocyclopropane‐1‐carboxylate synthase), AdACO1 (1‐aminocyclopropane‐1‐carboxylic acid oxidase), AdMAN1 (endo‐β‐mannanase) and AaTPS1 (terpene synthase). Moreover, subcellular analysis indicated that the location of the AdNAC6/7 proteins was influenced by Ade‐miR164. Multiple omics‐based approaches revealed a novel regulatory link for fruit ripening that involved ethylene‐miR164‐NAC. The regulatory pathway for miR164‐NAC is present in various fruit (e.g. Rosaceae fruit, citrus, grape), with implications for fruit ripening regulation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/nph.16233

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 164

Metadata

Authors
Wang, W., Wang, J., Wu, Y., Li, D., Allan, A. C., & Yin, X.
Venue
New Phytologist
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2019-11-11
Volume
225
Issue
4
Pages
1618-1634
ISSN
  • 0028-646X (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-8137
OpenAlex
W2977316994
Cited by
164
References
2
FWCI
10.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Genome‐wide analysis of coding and non‐coding RNA reveals a conserved miR164‐NAC regulatory pathway for fruit ripening. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/nph.16233
The paper
Wang, W., Wang, J., Wu, Y., Li, D., Allan, A. C., & Yin, X. (2020). Genome‐wide analysis of coding and non‐coding RNA reveals a conserved miR164‐NAC regulatory pathway for fruit ripening. New Phytologist. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.16233

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.