The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A unique C‐terminal domain contributes to the molecular function of Restorer‐of‐fertility proteins in plant mitochondria
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Summary: Restorer‐of‐fertility ( Rf ) genes encode pentatricopeptide repeat (PPR) proteins that are targeted to mitochondria where they specifically bind to transcripts that induce cytoplasmic male sterility and repress their expression. In searching for a molecular signature unique to this class of proteins, we found that a majority of known Rf proteins have a distinct domain, which we called RfCTD ( Restorer‐of‐fertility C‐terminal domain ), and its presence correlates with the ability to induce cleavage of the mitochondrial RNA target. A screen of 219 angiosperm genomes from 123 genera using a sequence profile that can quickly and accurately identify RfCTD sequences revealed considerable variation in RFL/RfCTD gene numbers across flowering plants. We observed that plant genera with bisexual flowers have significantly higher numbers of RFL genes compared to those with unisexual flowers, consistent with a role of these proteins in restoration of male fertility. We show that removing the RfCTD from the RFL protein RNA PROCESSING FACTOR 2‐ nad6 prevented cleavage of its RNA target, the nad6 transcript, in Arabidopsis thaliana mitochondria. We provide a simple way of identifying putative Rf candidates in genome sequences, new insights into the molecular mode of action of Rf proteins and the evolution of fertility restoration in flowering plants.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 105
- 10.1007/s00122-004-1591-2 · DOI
- 10.1007/s00122-012-1989-1 · DOI
- Anger N, 2017, Dioecy in Amborella trichopoda: evidence for genetically based sex determination and its consequences for inferences of the breeding system in early angiosperms, Annals of Botany, 119, 591
- 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002910 · DOI
- 10.1146/annurev-arplant-050213-040159 · DOI
- 10.1534/genetics.109.108175 · DOI
- 10.1038/hdy.1993.164 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.102301599 · DOI
- 10.4161/rna.26129 · DOI
- 10.1111/ppl.12423 · DOI
- 10.1111/tpj.14458 · DOI
- 10.1046/j.1365-313X.2003.01799.x · DOI
- 10.1016/S0764-4469(01)01324-5 · DOI
- 10.1023/A:1022381016145 · DOI
- 10.1098/rspb.2016.1493 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.tig.2006.12.004 · DOI
- 10.1146/annurev-arplant-050213-040119 · DOI
- 10.1111/tpj.13121 · DOI
- 10.1038/s42003-018-0166-8 · DOI
- 10.4161/rna.25568 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF00392310 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10592-005-9073-x · DOI
- 10.1093/aob/mcu134 · DOI
- 10.1111/tpj.15045 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002195 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/nar/gkh340 · DOI · Paper page
- Fischer S, 2011, Using OrthoMCL to assign proteins to OrthoMCL‐DB groups or to cluster proteomes into new ortholog groups, Current Protocols in Bioinformatics, 6, 6.12.1
- 10.1073/pnas.1007667108 · DOI
- 10.1111/tpj.13185 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2006.02953.x · DOI
- 10.1002/iub.2062 · DOI
- 10.1107/S1399004714024869 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.1200318109 · DOI
- 10.1146/annurev.ge.25.120191.002333 · DOI
- 10.1105/tpc.015966 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF00324679 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2010.04460.x · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cell.2008.09.013 · DOI
- 10.1105/tpc.111.093211 · DOI
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq003 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.2208759119 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.pld.2022.12.007 · DOI
- 10.1104/pp.111.181552 · DOI
- 10.1105/tpc.109.066944 · DOI
- 10.1093/molbev/mst010 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/978-3-642-83139-3 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0014-5793(03)00480-0 · DOI
- 10.1105/tpc.114.134189 · DOI
- 10.1046/j.1365-313X.2003.01735.x · DOI
- 10.1046/j.1365-313X.2003.01961.x · DOI
- Lechner M, 2015, Distribution of ribonucleoprotein and protein‐only RNase P in Eukarya, Molecular Biology and Evolution, 32, 3186
- 10.1093/nar/gkab301 · DOI
- 10.4161/rna.26172 · DOI
- 10.1093/jxb/erx239 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.molp.2016.04.004 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2008.03581.x · DOI
- 10.1105/tpc.104.022236 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41467-021-26931-3 · DOI
- 10.2307/3869326 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1365-294X.1996.tb00291.x · DOI
- 10.1016/j.biochi.2015.04.004 · DOI
- 10.1186/1756-0500-6-525 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0209713 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41467-021-21225-0 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.pbi.2021.102166 · DOI
- 10.1038/srep35152 · DOI
- 10.1111/tpj.14115 · DOI
- 10.1104/pp.109.141770 · DOI
- 10.1093/molbev/msab115 · DOI
- 10.1038/emboj.2009.121 · DOI
- 10.4161/rna.25273 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0009490 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1073/pnas.1012076108 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.3732/ajb.1400196 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0168-9525(00)02024-2 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/nar/gkr1138 · DOI
- 10.3390/genes11030269 · DOI
- 10.1007/s11103-021-01153-9 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.tplants.2008.10.001 · DOI
- Shaw CH, 1995, Introduction of cloning plasmids into Agrobacterium tumefaciens, Methods in Molecular Biology, 49, 33
- 10.1093/aob/mcr170 · DOI
- 10.1111/tpj.13111 · DOI
- 10.1111/tpj.12724 · DOI
- 10.1007/s11103-017-0591-y · DOI
- 10.1016/j.xplc.2022.100413 · DOI
- 10.1007/s11103-020-01090-z · DOI
- 10.1093/mp/ssu047 · DOI
- 10.5511/plantbiotechnology.21.0607a · DOI
- 10.1016/j.tplants.2004.10.001 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2006.tb01146.x · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.2105274118 · DOI
- 10.1007/s00122-021-03777-3 · DOI
- 10.1105/tpc.105.038240 · DOI
- 10.1093/jxb/ert065 · DOI
- 10.1111/tpj.13126 · DOI
- 10.3390/ijms222212450 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41598-018-21269-1 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0057286 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jtbi.2019.06.011 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gkz075 · DOI
- 10.1101/2022.11.08.515711 · DOI
- 10.1186/s12284-017-0142-9 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.1612460114 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10265-012-0527-1 · DOI
- 10.1111/tpj.13093 · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- Huynh, S. D., Melonek, J., Colas des Francs‐Small, C., Bond, C. S., & Small, I.
- Affiliations
- School of Molecular Sciences, ARC Centre of Excellence in Plant Energy Biology The University of Western Australia Crawley WA 6009 Australia
- The University of Western Australia (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Melonek, Joanna
- Small, Ian
- Venue
- New Phytologist
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2023-08-07
- Volume
- 240
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 830-845
- ISSN
- 0028-646X (ISSN-L)
- 1469-8137
- OpenAlex
- W4385647699
- Cited by
- 17
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1
- FWCI
- 1.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Locations
- New Phytologist (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- UWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- Australian Research Council (CE140100008, LP200100547)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Plant Reproductive Biology
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Molecular Biology Research
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Chromosomal and Genetic Variations
- Keywords
- pentatricopeptide repeat proteins, cytoplasmic male sterility, male fertility restoration, mitochondrial RNA processing, flowering plant evolution, unisexual flowers, angiosperm genomes, Arabidopsis thaliana
- MeSH terms
- Cytoplasm, Fertility, Mitochondria, Plant Proteins, Genes, Plant, Arabidopsis, Plant Infertility
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review