The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Golgi‐associated retrograde protein ( GARP ) complex recruits retromer to trans ‐Golgi network for FgKex2 and FgSnc1 recycling, necessary for the development and pathogenicity of Fusarium graminearum
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Summary: In eukaryotes, the retromer complex plays a crucial role in the sorting and retrograde transport of cargo proteins from endosomes to the trans ‐Golgi network (TGN). Despite its importance, the molecular details of this intracellular transport process remain unclear. Here, we have identified a Golgi‐associated retrograde protein (GARP) complex as a mediator of vesicle transport that facilitates the recruitment of the retromer complex to the TGN to exert its functions. The GARP complex is mainly localized in the TGN where it interacts with the retromer complex. This interaction is evolutionarily conserved across species. Furthermore, we identified FgKex2 and FgSnc1 as cargo proteins in the GARP/retromer‐mediated recycling pathway. Loss of GARP or retromer results in a complete missorting of FgKex2 and FgSnc1 into the vacuolar degradation pathway, which affects the growth, development, biogenesis of toxisomes and pathogenicity of Fusarium graminearum . In summary, we demonstrate for the first time that GARP promotes the recruitment of retromer from endosomes to the TGN, thereby establishing a GARP/retromer transport pathway that coordinates the recycling of cargo proteins FgKex2 and FgSnc1. This process is essential for maintaining sustained growth and development and significantly contributes to the pathogenicity of F. graminearum .
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764
Improved prediction of protein-protein interactions using AlphaFold2
Bryant, P., Pozzati, G., & Elofsson, A. (2021) · doi:10.1101/2021.09.15.460468 · Cited by 1,022
Research works printed but not linked: 84
- 10.1007/s44154-021-00020-3 · DOI
- 10.1007/s44154-023-00114-0 · DOI
- 10.3390/ijms18081601 · DOI
- 10.1080/15569540903092142 · DOI
- 10.3390/microorganisms9010079 · DOI
- 10.1094/PHYTO.1999.89.4.293 · DOI
- 10.1038/srep44296 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0092-8674(03)01079-1 · DOI
- 10.1038/nrm1985 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cub.2010.09.015 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.fgb.2003.12.002 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.funbio.2010.04.006 · DOI
- 10.3389/fcell.2023.1140605 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.aar4142 · DOI
- 10.1111/nph.19050 · DOI
- 10.1146/annurev-phyto-082718-100318 · DOI
- 10.1038/nsmb.3264 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1091/mbc.e02-10-0654 · DOI
- 10.1091/mbc.11.1.305 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1364-3703.2011.00783.x · DOI
- 10.1038/ncb3154 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.devcel.2007.12.014 · DOI
- 10.1242/dev.125.10.1833 · DOI
- 10.1007/s00438-002-0748-4 · DOI
- 10.1042/BST20140290 · DOI
- 10.1091/mbc.11.10.3629 · DOI
- 10.1091/mbc.11.12.4105 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1371/journal.pgen.1007291 · DOI
- 10.1094/MPMI.2002.15.11.1119 · DOI
- Jafari M, 2019, Why, when and how to adjust your P values?, Cell Journal, 20, 604
- 10.1073/pnas.0508467102 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41467-019-08726-9 · DOI
- Jovic M, 2010, The early endosome: a busy sorting station for proteins at the crossroads, Histology and Histopathology, 25, 99
- 10.1111/j.1364-3703.2011.00762.x · DOI
- 10.3390/ijms24076069 · DOI
- 10.1271/bbb.70183 · DOI
- 10.1007/s00425-005-0216-6 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.pestbp.2018.11.012 · DOI
- 10.1038/srep18101 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ibmb.2014.11.007 · DOI
- 10.1104/pp.103.037747 · DOI
- 10.1111/nph.14894 · DOI
- 10.1038/nature04717 · DOI
- 10.1111/tra.12693 · DOI
- 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90219-4 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.ejcb.2015.04.003 · DOI
- 10.1094/PDIS.1997.81.12.1340 · DOI
- 10.1094/MPMI-04-12-0081-R · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0063077 · DOI
- 10.1271/bbb.80437 · DOI
- 10.1128/EC.3.4.1036-1048.2004 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1600-0854.2007.00606.x · DOI
- 10.1007/s00438-007-0291-4 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1600-0854.2010.01049.x · DOI
- 10.1242/dev.099333 · DOI
- 10.1080/15548627.2022.2114271 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1128/MCB.00495-09 · DOI
- 10.1094/MPMI-8-0593 · DOI
- 10.1091/mbc.e05-11-1002 · DOI
- 10.1083/jcb.113.3.527 · DOI
- 10.1242/bio.201410975 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0204362 · DOI
- 10.1038/ng1661 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.molcel.2011.12.004 · DOI
- 10.1007/s00018-008-8354-1 · DOI
- 10.1083/jcb.137.1.79 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/1462-2920.13730 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-1-0716-3441-7_5 · DOI
- 10.1074/jbc.M209428200 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.ppat.1006827 · DOI
- 10.1099/mic.0.29034-0 · DOI
- 10.1104/pp.108.129684 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.bbrc.2013.12.008 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41380-018-0221-3 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/s00253-024-13022-8 · DOI
- 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.042308.113327 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.fgb.2004.08.001 · DOI
- 10.1111/nph.16935 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pgen.1007546 · DOI
- 10.1111/1462-2920.12982 · DOI
- 10.1111/nph.15178 · DOI
- 10.1111/nph.13867 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pgen.1005704 · DOI
- 10.1111/1462-2920.14874 · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- Long, Y., Chen, X., Chen, J., Zhang, H., Lin, Y., Cheng, S., Pu, N., Zhou, X., Sheng, R., Abubakar, Y. S., Zheng, H., Yun, Y., Lu, G., Wang, Z., & Zheng, W.
- Affiliations
- Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University (CN)
- Jiangxi Agricultural University College of Agriculture Nanchang Jiangxi 330000 China
- Agricultural and Rural Comprehensive Service Center Shuitang Town Xinping County Yunnan 653400 China
- Ahmadu Bello University (NG)
- Minjiang University (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Zheng, Wenhui
- ORCID
- Venue
- New Phytologist
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2025-02-15
- Volume
- 246
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 666-688
- ISSN
- 0028-646X (ISSN-L)
- 1469-8137
- OpenAlex
- W4407605929
- Cited by
- 7
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 2
- FWCI
- 3.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Locations
- New Phytologist (publishedVersion)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province (2021J06015)
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (32122071, 32272481)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Cellular transport and secretion
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Fungal and yeast genetics research
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases
- Keywords
- GARP complex, retromer complex, trans-Golgi network, retrograde transport, protein recycling, Fusarium graminearum, fungal pathogenicity, endosomal sorting, vesicle trafficking
- MeSH terms
- Fungal Proteins, Fusarium, Golgi Apparatus, Protein Binding, Endosomes, Vacuoles, Virulence, Protein Transport, trans-Golgi Network, Vesicular Transport Proteins
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review