Agroecological transition: A viability model to assess soil restoration
Abstract
Since the 1950s, intensive and specialized agricultural systems using a few select species and relying heavily on agrochemical inputs have enabled a huge increase in food production. However, in parallel, drawbacks appeared including biodiversity loss, greenhouse gas emission, erosion, and water pollution. Today shifting farming systems to mitigate soil degradation trends is indispensable. Using viability theory, we propose a dynamic model of the sequence of agricultural productions and practices that can be implemented in the long term to restore soil quality while respecting a set of agronomic and economic constraints. The paths to soil restoration vary depending on agronomic and economic constraints, the time available for restoration, the initial soil conditions, and investment capacities. Economic valuation of the minimum cost of restoration shows that the agroecological transition may be costly and that farmers can have difficulty meeting the costs, thus raising the question of how the cost of agroecological transition is to be shared.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Le modèle de viabilité élaboré trouve ses origines dans Durand et al. (2017).
“Le modèle de viabilité élaboré trouve ses origines dans Durand et al. (2017).”
From Mettre en œuvre la transition agroécologique : une analyse des règles de décision dans les systèmes bananiers aux Antilles françaises (2020) · cites this paper as Durand et al. (2017)
Cites
Crop Management for Soil Carbon Sequestration
Jarecki, M. K., & Lal, R. (2003) · Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences · doi:10.1080/713608318 · Cited by 396 · see citing works
GISQ, a multifunctional indicator of soil quality
Velasquez, E., Lavelle, P., & Andrade, M. (2007) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2007.06.013 · Cited by 240 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The socio-economic issues of agroecology: a scoping review
Fiore, V., Borrello, M., Carlucci, D., Giannoccaro, G., Russo, S., Stempfle, S., & Roselli, L. (2024) · Agricultural and Food Economics · doi:10.1186/s40100-024-00311-z · Cited by 52 · see citing works
Angeon, V., & Bates, S. (2020) · Revue d’Économie Régionale & Urbaine · doi:10.3917/reru.203.0503 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Durand, M., Désilles, A., Saint‐Pierre, P., Angeon, V., & Ozier‐Lafontaine, H.
- Affiliations
- Gouvernance, Risque, Environnement, Développement (FR)
- École Nationale Supérieure de Techniques Avancées (FR)
- LASTRE Paris France
- Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement (FR)
- Venue
- Natural Resource Modeling
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2017-08
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- online
- ISSN
- 0890-8575 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-7445
- OpenAlex
- W2743024348
- Cited by
- 24
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3
- FWCI
- 2.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Natural Resource Modeling (publishedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Agence Nationale de la Recherche (AGROBIOSPHERE)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Sustainable Agricultural Systems Analysis
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant and soil sciences
- Keywords
- agroecological transition, soil restoration, viability theory, soil degradation, restoration costs, cost sharing, agronomic constraints, economic constraints, soil quality, agricultural intensification, biodiversity loss, greenhouse gas emissions, erosion, water pollution
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review