Cited by 24Sustainable Agricultural Systems AnalysisAgriculture, Land Use, Rural DevelopmentPlant and soil sciences

Agroecological transition: A viability model to assess soil restoration

Durand, Marie‐Hélène, Désilles, Anna, Saint‐Pierre, Patrick, Angeon, Valérie, Ozier‐Lafontaine, Harry·2017·Natural Resource Modeling

Abstract

Since the 1950s, intensive and specialized agricultural systems using a few select species and relying heavily on agrochemical inputs have enabled a huge increase in food production. However, in parallel, drawbacks appeared including biodiversity loss, greenhouse gas emission, erosion, and water pollution. Today shifting farming systems to mitigate soil degradation trends is indispensable. Using viability theory, we propose a dynamic model of the sequence of agricultural productions and practices that can be implemented in the long term to restore soil quality while respecting a set of agronomic and economic constraints. The paths to soil restoration vary depending on agronomic and economic constraints, the time available for restoration, the initial soil conditions, and investment capacities. Economic valuation of the minimum cost of restoration shows that the agroecological transition may be costly and that farmers can have difficulty meeting the costs, thus raising the question of how the cost of agroecological transition is to be shared.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/nrm.12134

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Durand, M., Désilles, A., Saint‐Pierre, P., Angeon, V., & Ozier‐Lafontaine, H.
Affiliations
  • Gouvernance, Risque, Environnement, Développement (FR)
  • École Nationale Supérieure de Techniques Avancées (FR)
  • LASTRE Paris France
  • Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement (FR)
Venue
Natural Resource Modeling
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-08
Volume
30
Issue
3
Pages
online
ISSN
  • 0890-8575 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-7445
OpenAlex
W2743024348
Cited by
24
References
2
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3
FWCI
2.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Natural Resource Modeling (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Funders
Agence Nationale de la Recherche (AGROBIOSPHERE)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Sustainable Agricultural Systems Analysis
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant and soil sciences
Keywords
agroecological transition, soil restoration, viability theory, soil degradation, restoration costs, cost sharing, agronomic constraints, economic constraints, soil quality, agricultural intensification, biodiversity loss, greenhouse gas emissions, erosion, water pollution

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review