Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 1

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Introduction to Review Articles on ‘Good work: the Taylor Review of modern working practices’, introduction by Andrew Smith

Smith, Andrew·2019·New Technology, Work and Employment
DOI 10.1111/ntwe.12134
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/ntwe.12134

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 24

  1. 10.1111/j.1468-005X.2011.00267.x · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1093/indlaw/dwx028 · DOI
  3. 10.1111/ntwe.12038 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1111/irj.12232 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1111/ntwe.12008 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development(2017) Taylor Review has the Potential to Change the Future of Work https://www.cipd.co.uk/about/media/press/110717-taylor-review(accessed 25 January 2019).
  7. 10.1017/CBO9780511488962 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1080/09585190601167441 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199664719.001.0001 · DOI
  10. 10.1177/0950017015624399 · DOI
  11. Green F., 2006, Demanding Work
  12. 10.1177/0950017016666199 · DOI
  13. 10.1111/j.1468-005X.2008.00202.x · DOI
  14. 10.1111/ntwe.12026 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1111/ntwe.12102 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1177/0950017017728614 · DOI
  17. 10.1111/irj.12228 · DOI
  18. 10.1111/ntwe.12087 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1177/0950017017751790 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Taylor M., 2017, Good Work: The Taylor Review of Modern Working Practices
  21. 10.1111/ntwe.12027 · DOI
  22. TUC, 2018, Taylor Review: Measures to Improve Transparency in the UK Labour Market. TUC Response to the BEIS Consultation
  23. TUC, 2018, Enforcement of Employment Rights. TUC Response to the Consultation on Enforcement of Rights Recommendations
  24. 10.1111/ntwe.12112 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Smith, A.
Affiliations
University of Bradford
Venue
New Technology, Work and Employment
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2019-03-11
Volume
34
Issue
2
Pages
91-94
ISSN
  • 0268-1072
  • 1468-005X
DOI
10.1111/ntwe.12134
Cited by
1
References
0
Language
en
Licence
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.