Measuring digital platform‐mediated workers
Abstract
The role of digital platform workers, whether they are delivering fastfood or working remotely categorising photographs, has received much attention both in the media and among policymakers. However, there is a lack of comparable and consistent statistics, over time and across countries, on the number of platform workers, their characteristics and their types of jobs and tasks. This review article examines the attempts that have been made to measure the number of digital platform workers, including both traditional surveys and uses of big data, and it highlights the difficulties encountered and offers guidance on future attempts to estimate the number of digital platform workers.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Filipetto, S., Micha, A., Pereyra, F., Poggi, C., & Trombetta, M. (2024) · New Technology, Work and Employment · doi:10.1111/ntwe.12283 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
- Authors
- O'Farrell, R., & Montagnier, P.
- Affiliations
- Organisation de Coopération et de Développement Economiques (FR)
- Corresponding author
- O'Farrell, Rory
- ORCID
- O'Farrell, Rory
- Venue
- New Technology, Work and Employment
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2019-11-27
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 130-144
- ISSN
- 0268-1072 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-005X
- OpenAlex
- W2989731269
- Cited by
- 44
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 5.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- New Technology Work and Employment (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Digital Economy and Work Transformation
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Industrial relations › Legal and Labor Studies
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Labor market dynamics and wage inequality
- Keywords
- platform workers, gig economy, platform work, big data, labour force survey, remote work, online labour platforms, cross-national comparison
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review