Cited by 28Nursing Diagnosis and DocumentationHealthcare Technology and Patient MonitoringPatient Safety and Medication Errors

Nursing surveillance: A concept analysis

Halverson, Colleen C., Scott Tilley, Donna·2022·Nursing Forum

Abstract

Aim To provide a framework to assess and evaluate nursing surveillance of patients. Background The Nursing Interventions Classifications define surveillance as the purposeful and ongoing acquisition, interpretation, and synthesis of patient data for clinical decision making and is essential for improving patient safety. Data source The existing literature was searched using CINAHL, OVID, EmCare, and 11 ScienceDirect databases. Methods The Walker and Avant method was used to analyze the concept of surveillance. Results Technology that facilitates surveillance in the community is ubiquitous in acute care settings. Nurses caring for patients use a tremendous volume of patient data to inform their clinical decision-making. Five attributes are associated with nursing surveillance: systematic process, pattern recognition, coordinated communication, the anticipation of problems of instability, and decision making. Surveillance is dynamic and extends over time. Antecedents to nursing surveillance include sufficient nurse education, nurse expertise, nurse staffing, as well as an organizational culture that supports nursing surveillance. When nursing surveillance is present, patient safety is enhanced and adverse events that harm patients are reduced. The concept of nursing surveillance is complex and defies empirical measurement, though it is possible to measure the attributes and outcomes. Conclusions Nursing surveillance is essential to the safe management of complex patient cases.…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/nuf.12702

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Halverson, C. C., & Scott Tilley, D.
Affiliations
  • Texas Woman's University (US)
  • College of Nursing Texas Woman's University Dallas Texas USA
Corresponding author
Halverson, Colleen C.
Venue
Nursing Forum
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2022-02-20
Volume
57
Issue
3
Pages
454-460
ISSN
  • 0029-6473 (ISSN-L)
  • 1744-6198
OpenAlex
W4212918194
Cited by
28
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1
FWCI
8.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nursing Forum (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Issues, ethics and legal aspects › Nursing Diagnosis and Documentation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Healthcare Technology and Patient Monitoring
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Patient Safety and Medication Errors
Keywords
nursing surveillance, patient monitoring, patient safety, clinical decision-making, pattern recognition, Nursing Interventions Classification, adverse events, nurse staffing, organizational culture
MeSH terms
Communication, Concept Formation, Humans, Organizational Culture, Patient Safety

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review