The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Proliferation and significance of clinically relevant β‐lactamases
Abstract
Inactivation of β‐lactam antibiotics by β‐lactamases in bacterial infections is associated with some of the most serious infectious disease issues that are currently encountered. The evolution of unique β‐lactamases has resulted in more than 1,300 distinct enzymes that have been identified in natural clinical isolates. Of these enzymes, the most deleterious β‐lactamases are the extended‐spectrum β‐lactamases, or ESBLs, that hydrolyze most penicillins and cephalosporins, and the carbapenemases that may inactivate all β‐lactam classes of drugs. The most prominent ESBLs worldwide are the CTX‐M‐14 and CTX‐M‐15 enzymes. Among enzyme families, the TEM and OXA β‐lactamases exhibit the greatest number of variants. The broad groups of carbapenemases are particularly treacherous, especially the KPC serine carbapenemases and the NDM family of metallo‐β‐lactamases, both of which appear in multidrug‐resistant Gram‐negative pathogens that are often resistant to most classes of antibiotics. Although new β‐lactamase inhibitor combinations are being investigated as a means of controlling infections caused by these organisms, additional approaches are sorely needed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Antibiotic resistance is ancient
D’Costa, V. M., King, C. E., Kalan, L., Morar, M., Sung, W. W. L., Schwarz, C., Froese, D., Zazula, G., Calmels, F., Debruyne, R., et al. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature10388 · Cited by 2,720
Updated Functional Classification of β-Lactamases
Bush, K., & Jacoby, G. A. (2010) · Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy · doi:10.1128/aac.01009-09 · Cited by 2,367
Self-citationThree Decades of β-Lactamase Inhibitors
Drawz, S. M., & Bonomo, R. A. (2010) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.00037-09 · Cited by 1,709
Antibiotic resistance is prevalent in an isolated cave microbiome
Bhullar, K., Waglechner, N., Pawlowski, A., Koteva, K., Banks, E. D., Johnston, M. D., Barton, H. A., & Wright, G. D. (2012) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0034953 · Cited by 736
Cited by
Mechanisms of Antibiotic Resistance
Munita, J. M., & Arias, C. A. (2016) · Microbiology Spectrum · doi:10.1128/microbiolspec.vmbf-0016-2015 · Cited by 2,782
An overview of the antimicrobial resistance mechanisms of bacteria
C Reygaert, W., & Department of Biomedical Sciences, O. U. W. B. S. O. M. (2018) · AIMS Microbiology · doi:10.3934/microbiol.2018.3.482 · Cited by 1,893
The Challenge of Efflux-Mediated Antibiotic Resistance in Gram-Negative Bacteria
Li, X.-Z., Plésiat, P., & Nikaido, H. (2015) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.00117-14 · Cited by 1,614
β-Lactams and β-Lactamase Inhibitors: An Overview
Bush, K., & Bradford, P. A. (2016) · Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Medicine · doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a025247 · Cited by 1,412
Self-citationPast and Present Perspectives on β-Lactamases
Bush, K. (2018) · Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy · doi:10.1128/aac.01076-18 · Cited by 832
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Bush, K.
- Venue
- Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2013-01
- Volume
- 1277
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 84-90
- ISSN
- 0077-8923 (ISSN-L)
- 1749-6632
- OpenAlex
- W1536681123
- Cited by
- 337
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 15.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Proliferation and significance of clinically relevant β‐lactamases. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/nyas.12023
- The paper
- Bush, K. (2013). Proliferation and significance of clinically relevant β‐lactamases. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.12023
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.