The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cognitive plasticity in older adults: effects of cognitive training and physical exercise
Abstract
Cognitive training, physical activity, and exercise have often been reported to improve cognitive performance in older adults. This paper reviews some seminal and recent studies using these approaches to improve cognition and physical functioning in healthy older adults and in patients suffering from non‐neurological chronic medical conditions. Results from cognitive training studies suggest that despite performance improvement in trained tasks, transfer effects appeared very limited. Surprisingly though, computerized dual‐task training has been shown to improve balance and postural control in tests of physical functioning, suggesting that broad transfer can sometimes be observed. Physical exercise intervention studies generally found significant and large improvements in physical capacity, in some cognitive domains, and in quality of life. The benefits seem to be equivalent between frail and nonfrail participants. Overall, results reviewed here support the notion that cognitive plasticity for attentional control, as induced by cognitive training or physical activity and exercise, is preserved in late adulthood. Moreover, results of studies with patients at risk of cognitive decline also suggest that cognitive training and exercise interventions are promising nonpharmaceutical tools to help improve cognition in older at‐risk individuals.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The cognitive neuroscience of ageing
Grady, C. (2012) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn3256 · Cited by 1,286
Bherer, L., Erickson, K. I., & Liu-Ambrose, T. (2013) · Journal of Aging Research · doi:10.1155/2013/657508 · Cited by 899
Self-citationBherer, L., Kramer, A. F., Peterson, M. S., Colcombe, S., Erickson, K., & Becic, E. (2005) · Psychology and Aging · doi:10.1037/0882-7974.20.4.695 · Cited by 312
Self-citation
Cited by
Virtual reality among the elderly: a usefulness and acceptance study from Taiwan
Syed-Abdul, S., Malwade, S., Nursetyo, A. A., Sood, M., Bhatia, M., Barsasella, D., Liu, M. F., Chang, C.-C., Srinivasan, K., M., R., et al. (2019) · BMC Geriatrics · doi:10.1186/s12877-019-1218-8 · Cited by 211
Relationship between Academic Stress, Physical Activity and Diet in University Students of Education
Chacón-Cuberos, R., Zurita-Ortega, F., Olmedo-Moreno, E. M., & Castro-Sánchez, M. (2019) · Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.3390/bs9060059 · Cited by 62
Metadata
- Authors
- Bherer, L.
- Venue
- Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2015-03
- Volume
- 1337
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-6
- ISSN
- 0077-8923 (ISSN-L)
- 1749-6632
- OpenAlex
- W1544235619
- Cited by
- 303
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 15.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.