The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Update on management of diabetic foot ulcers
Open accessAbstract
Diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) are a serious complication of diabetes that results in significant morbidity and mortality. Mortality rates associated with the development of a DFU are estimated to be 5% in the first 12 months, and 5‐year morality rates have been estimated at 42%. The standard practices in DFU management include surgical debridement, dressings to facilitate a moist wound environment and exudate control, wound off‐loading, vascular assessment, and infection and glycemic control. These practices are best coordinated by a multidisciplinary diabetic foot wound clinic. Even with this comprehensive approach, there is still room for improvement in DFU outcomes. Several adjuvant therapies have been studied to reduce DFU healing times and amputation rates. We reviewed the rationale and guidelines for current standard of care practices and reviewed the evidence for the efficacy of adjuvant agents. The adjuvant therapies reviewed include the following categories: nonsurgical debridement agents, dressings and topical agents, oxygen therapies, negative pressure wound therapy, acellular bioproducts, human growth factors, energy‐based therapies, and systemic therapies. Many of these agents have been found to be beneficial in improving wound healing rates, although a large proportion of the data are small, randomized controlled trials with high risks of bias.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Inter-Society Consensus for the Management of Peripheral Arterial Disease (TASC II)
Norgren, L., Hiatt, W. R., Dormandy, J. A., Nehler, M. R., Harris, K. A., & Fowkes, F. G. R. (2007) · Journal of Vascular Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2006.12.037 · Cited by 8,191
The role of pressure offloading on diabetic foot ulcer healing and prevention of recurrence.
Bus, S. A. (2016) · Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery · doi:10.1097/prs.0000000000002686 · Cited by 118
Guo, X., Mu, D., & Gao, F. (2017) · International Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.02.008 · Cited by 80
Cazzell, S., Vayser, D., Pham, H., Walters, J., Reyzelman, A., Samsell, B., Dorsch, K., & Moore, M. (2017) · Wound Repair and Regeneration · doi:10.1111/wrr.12551 · Cited by 78
Cited by
Chlorella sp.-Ameliorated Undesirable Microenvironment Promotes Diabetic Wound Healing
Wu, H., Yang, P., Li, A., Jin, X., Zhang, Z., & Lv, H. (2023) · Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica B · doi:10.1016/j.apsb.2022.06.012 · Cited by 65
Táborská, J., Blanquer, A., Brynda, E., Filová, E., Stiborová, L., Jenčová, V., Havlíčková, K., Riedelová, Z., & Riedel, T. (2023) · International Journal of Nanomedicine · doi:10.2147/ijn.s393890 · Cited by 21
Sui, L., Xie, Q., Jiang, H.-T., & Li, X.-D. (2024) · BMC Endocrine Disorders · doi:10.1186/s12902-024-01550-3 · Cited by 14
Holl, J., Pawlukianiec, C., Corton Ruiz, J., Groth, D., Grubczak, K., Hady, H. R., Dadan, J., Reszec, J., Czaban, S., Kowalewski, C., et al. (2021) · Pharmaceutics · doi:10.3390/pharmaceutics13122164 · Cited by 12
Metadata
- Authors
- Everett, E., & Mathioudakis, N.
- Venue
- Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2018-01
- Volume
- 1411
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 153-165
- ISSN
- 0077-8923 (ISSN-L)
- 1749-6632
- OpenAlex
- W2793801139
- Cited by
- 913
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 32.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.