Cited by 48Art Education and DevelopmentArt Therapy and Mental HealthYouth Development and Social Support

Arts engagement and self‐esteem in children: results from a propensity score matching analysis

Open access
Mak, Hei Wan, Fancourt, Daisy·2019·Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Self‐esteem is regarded as vital to children's social and cognitive development and emotional well‐being. To date, a few studies have suggested that arts activities can improve self‐esteem in young people. However, such studies mainly focused on small, nonrepresentative samples. In this study, data from 6209 children included in the United Kingdom Millennium Cohort Study were analyzed using propensity score matching to investigate the association between children's arts engagement ((1) listening to or playing music; (2) drawing, painting, or making things; and (3) reading for enjoyment) and self‐esteem at age 11. All three activities were associated with higher levels of self‐esteem when matching for all identified demographic, socioeconomic, and familial confounders. Additionally, the relationship was more prominent when children engaged in these activities with their parents on a regular basis. However, there was no clear evidence that ability in either music or arts activities moderated the relationship with self‐esteem, although English language ability may moderate the association between reading and self‐esteem. These results suggest that initiatives to promote arts engagement in children may provide a practical and efficient way to improve children's self‐esteem. This is the key given self‐esteem in childhood tends to decline as children enter adolescence, yet is linked to lifelong development and well‐being.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/nyas.14056

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Reading and mental health are not randomly distributed in the population, making associations in observational data vulnerable to confounding.

    “However, reading and mental health are not randomly distributed in the population (Mak & Fancourt, 2019), making associations in observational data vulnerable to confounding.”

    From A counterfactual and random intercept cross‐lagged panel analysis of the effects of reading frequency on adolescent mental health in a large longitudinal study (2026) · cites this paper as Mak & Fancourt, 2019

    The Introduction (page unavailable) says children’s arts engagement is socially patterned and that demographic differences can confound its association with self-esteem; the paper includes reading among those activities. This supports the concern about confounding in observational data, but it does not establish that mental health itself is nonrandomly distributed across the population, and its analysis concerns children’s self-esteem rather than mental health broadly. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Previous counterfactual analysis studies have identified an effect of reading for pleasure on mental health up to early adolescence.

    “Previous counterfactual analysis studies have identified an effect of reading for pleasure on mental health up to early adolescence (Mak & Fancourt, 2019, 2020a).”

    From A counterfactual and random intercept cross‐lagged panel analysis of the effects of reading frequency on adolescent mental health in a large longitudinal study (2026) · cites this paper as Mak & Fancourt, 2019

    The Methods (Statistics) describe counterfactual propensity-score matching, and the Discussion reports that reading most days of the week was positively related to self-esteem in children aged 11. But the paper measures self-esteem rather than mental health broadly and describes a relationship, not an established causal effect; it also says the reading relationship was present only when parents regularly engaged in reading with their children. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Analysing the impact of reading for pleasure on mental health must take into account confounding due to the social patterning of reading for pleasure.

    “As noted; however, analysing the impact of reading for pleasure on mental health must take into account confounding due to the social patterning of reading for pleasure (Mak & Fancourt, 2019).”

    From A counterfactual and random intercept cross‐lagged panel analysis of the effects of reading frequency on adolescent mental health in a large longitudinal study (2026) · cites this paper as Mak & Fancourt, 2019

    The Introduction (page unavailable) says children’s arts engagement is socially patterned and that demographic differences can confound estimates of its relationship with self-esteem. The paper includes reading for enjoyment among those activities, but it studies self-esteem in children, not mental health outcomes or readers generally. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Using propensity score matching in the Millennium Cohort Study, Mak and Fancourt (2019) found that reading for pleasure at age 11 was associated with higher self-esteem.

    “Using a propensity score matching approach in data from the Millennium Cohort Study, Mak and Fancourt (2019) found that reading for pleasure at age 11 was associated with higher self‐esteem.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 15

  1. [1]Coulton, S., S. Clift, A. Skingley & J. Rodriguez. 2015 Effectiveness and cost‐effectiveness of community singing on mental health‐related quality of life of older people: randomised controlled trial. Br. J. Psychiatry 207: 250– 255. 26089304
  2. [3]Gold, C., M. Voracek & T. Wigram. 2004 Effects of music therapy for children and adolescents with psychopathology: a meta‐analysis. J. Child Psychol. Psychiatry 45: 1054– 1063. 15257662
  3. [5]Cook, A., J. Ogden & N. Winstone. 2018 The impact of a school‐based musical contact intervention on prosocial attitudes, emotions and behaviours: a pilot trial with autistic and neurotypical children. Autism 10.1177/1362361318787793. 30073859 · DOI
  4. [6]Mansfield, L., T. Kay, C. Meads, et al 2018 Sport and dance interventions for healthy young people (15–24 years) to promote subjective well‐being: a systematic review. BMJ Open 8: 1– 16. PMC6082460 30008444
  5. [8]Zarobe, L. & H. Bungay. 2017 The role of arts activities in developing resilience and mental wellbeing in children and young people: a rapid review of the literature. Perspect. Public Health 137: 337– 347. 28613107
  6. [18]Bandura, A. 1978 Self‐efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Adv. Behav. Res. Ther. 1: 139– 161. 847061
  7. [22]Guo, S. & M.W. Fraser. 2015 Propensity Score Analysis: Statistical Methods and Applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
  8. [23]Kessler, R.C., G. Andrews, L.J. Colpe, et al 2002 Short screening scales to monitor population prevalences and trends in non‐specific psychological distress. Psychol. Med. 32: 959– 976. 12214795
  9. [24]Goodman, R. 1997 The strengths and difficulties questionnaire: a research note. J. Child Psychol. Psychiatry 38: 581– 586. 9255702
  10. [26]Morgan, C.J. 2018 Reducing bias using propensity score matching. J. Nucl. Cardiol. 25: 404– 406. 28776312
  11. [28]Clarke, E., N. Dibben & S. Pitts. 2009 Music and Mind in Everyday Life. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  12. [30]DeNora, T. 2009 Music in Everyday Life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  13. [33]Rubin, M. & M. Hewstone. 1998 Self‐esteem hypothesis: a review and some suggestions for clarification. Personal. Soc. Psychol. Rev. 2: 40– 62. 15647150
  14. [35]Flouri, E. & A. Buchanan. 2004 Early father's and mother's involvement and child's later educational outcomes. Br. J. Educ. 74: 141– 153. 15130184
  15. [36]Hoyle, R.H. & S.S. Leff. 1997 The role of parental involvement in youth sport participation and performance. Adolescence 32: 233– 243. 9105503

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mak, H. W., & Fancourt, D.
Affiliations
University College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Fancourt, Daisy
Venue
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2019-04-15
Volume
1449
Issue
1
Pages
36-45
ISSN
  • 0077-8923 (ISSN-L)
  • 1749-6632
OpenAlex
W2938410791
Cited by
48
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1
FWCI
69.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust (205407/Z/16/Z)
  • Arts and Humanities Research Council (AH/P005888/1)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Visual Arts and Performing Arts › Art Education and Development
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Conservation › Art Therapy and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Youth Development and Social Support
Keywords
arts participation, self-esteem, children, drawing and painting, reading for pleasure, parental involvement, Millennium Cohort Study, English proficiency, child development, well-being
MeSH terms
Child Health, Art, Child, Female, United Kingdom, Humans, Male, Music, Parent-Child Relations, Parents, Quality of Life, Self Concept, Propensity Score

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review