Cited by 33Flood Risk Assessment and ManagementCoastal and Marine DynamicsUrban Stormwater Management Solutions

NPCC4: Climate change and New York City's flood risk

Open access
Rosenzweig, Bernice, Montalto, Franco A., Orton, Philip, Kaatz, Joel, Maher, Nicole, Kleyman, Jerry, Chen, Ziyu, Sanderson, Eric +3 more·2024·Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences

Abstract

This chapter of the New York City Panel on Climate Change 4 (NPCC4) report provides a comprehensive description of the different types of flood hazards (pluvial, fluvial, coastal, groundwater, and compound) facing New York City and provides climatological context that can be utilized, along with climate change projections, to support flood risk management (FRM). Previous NPCC reports documented coastal flood hazards and presented trends in historical and future precipitation and sea level but did not comprehensively assess all the city's flood hazards. Previous NPCC reports also discussed the implications of floods on infrastructure and the city's residents but did not review the impacts of flooding on the city's natural and nature‐based systems (NNBSs). This—the NPCC's first report focused on all drivers of flooding—describes and profiles historical examples of each type of flood and summarizes previous and ongoing research regarding exposure, vulnerability, and risk management, including with NNBS and nonstructural measures.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/nyas.15175

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • These lower-valued properties often retain disproportionately higher property tax assessments relative to their actual market values, thus increasing the financial burden on low-income people.

    “It is worth noting that these lower-valued properties often retain disproportionately higher property tax assessments relative to their actual market values, thus increasing the financial burden on low-income people.152,153”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rosenzweig, B., Montalto, F. A., Orton, P., Kaatz, J., Maher, N., Kleyman, J., Chen, Z., Sanderson, E., Adhikari, N., McPhearson, T., & Herreros‐Cantis, P.
Affiliations
  • Sarah Lawrence College (US)
  • Drexel University (US)
  • Stevens Institute of Technology (US)
  • Arcadis New York New York USA
  • The Nature Conservancy (US)
  • New York Botanical Garden (US)
  • The New School (US)
  • Basque Center for Climate Change Leioa Spain
Corresponding author
  • Rosenzweig, Bernice
  • Montalto, Franco A.
Venue
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2024-08-19
Volume
1539
Issue
1
Pages
127-184
ISSN
  • 0077-8923 (ISSN-L)
  • 1749-6632
OpenAlex
W4401687504
Cited by
33
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 6
FWCI
5.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Flood Risk Assessment and Management
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Earth-Surface Processes › Coastal and Marine Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Urban Stormwater Management Solutions
Keywords
climate change, flood risk, New York City, pluvial flooding, river flooding, coastal flooding, groundwater flooding, compound flooding, flood risk management, nature-based solutions, exposure and vulnerability, sea level rise, precipitation trends
MeSH terms
Humans, New York City, Risk Management, Floods, Climate Change

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review