Cited by 28Income, Poverty, and InequalityEconomic and Environmental ValuationQuality of Life Measurement

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Direct Estimation of Equivalence Scales and More Evidence on Independence of Base

Biewen, Martin, Juhasz, Andos·2017·Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics

Abstract

We explore a direct approach to estimating household equivalence scales from income satisfaction data. Our method differs from previous approaches to using satisfaction data for this purpose in that it can be used to directly fit and evaluate closed‐form and non‐parametric equivalence scales of any desired form. Its flexibility makes it easy to consider specific aspects such as income dependence or more specific information on household composition (such as whether household members live in a partner relationship). We estimate and evaluate a number of scales used in the literature. If the equivalence scale is assumed to be independent of income and to depend only on household size, we do not reject the validity of the widely used square‐root scale at conventional significance levels. We also test GESE and GAESE restrictions (Donaldson and Pendakur, 2003, 2006) and investigate in detail to what extent household economies of scale depend on income. Our results suggest that the income dependence differs fundamentally across household types (rising economies of scale for ‘family’ households, falling economies of scale for multi‐adult households without children and no income dependence for other households).

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/obes.12166

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 6 references

Research works printed but not linked: 43

  1. 10.1111/rssa.12090 · DOI
  2. 10.2307/2234982 · DOI
  3. 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2012.02.003 · DOI
  4. 10.1007/s10258-002-0006-z · DOI · Paper page
  5. Biewen M.andJuhasz A.(2013).A Goodness‐of‐Fit Approach to estimating equivalence scales IZA Discussion Paper No. 7209 Institute for the Study of Labor Bonn. · DOI
  6. 10.1007/BF00182510 · DOI
  7. 10.1016/S0047-2727(02)00168-8 · DOI
  8. 10.1111/j.0347-0520.2004.00369.x · DOI
  9. 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1255(1998090)13:5<435::AID-JAE506>3.0.CO;2-K · DOI
  10. 10.1093/restud/rdt019 · DOI
  11. 10.1111/1475-4991.00042 · DOI
  12. 10.2307/2234983 · DOI
  13. 10.1111/j.1467-8586.1992.tb00538.x · DOI
  14. Cutler D. M., 1992, Rising inequality? Changes in the distribution of income and consumption in the 1980s’,, American Economic Review, 82, 546
  15. 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2012.09.006 · DOI
  16. 10.2307/2234774 · DOI
  17. 10.1198/073500106000000035 · DOI
  18. 10.1257/aer.103.1.438 · DOI
  19. Easterlin R. A.andSawangfa W.(2007).Happiness and Domain Satisfaction Theory and Evidence IZA Discussion Paper No. 2584 Institute for the Study of Labor Bonn. · DOI
  20. 10.1111/j.1468-0297.2004.00235.x · DOI
  21. Frey B. S., 2002, Happiness and Economics: How the Economy and Institutions Affect Human Wellbeing, 10.1515/9781400829262 · DOI
  22. 10.1257/0002828041464551 · DOI
  23. 10.1016/0304-4076(86)90058-8 · DOI
  24. 10.1016/0014-2921(78)90009-0 · DOI
  25. 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2007.12.015 · DOI
  26. 10.1016/0047-2727(89)90035-2 · DOI · Paper page
  27. Lewbel A., 2008, The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics, 26
  28. 10.1016/j.jeconom.2008.09.012 · DOI
  29. Melenberg C., 1996, Frontiers in Economic Psychology ‐ 20th IAREP conference, 500
  30. 10.2307/1912023 · DOI
  31. Oswald A., 2003, How much do external factors affect wellbeing? A way to use ’happiness economics’ to decide’,, The Psychologist, 16, 140
  32. 10.1016/0047-2727(94)01465-Z · DOI
  33. 10.1016/S0304-4076(98)00020-7 · DOI · Paper page
  34. 10.1111/1468-0335.00250 · DOI
  35. 10.1016/S0014-2921(01)00151-9 · DOI
  36. Sacks D. W. Stevenson B.andWolfers J.(2010).Subjective Well‐Being Economic Development and Growth NBER Working Paper No. 16441 National Bureau of Economic Research. · DOI
  37. 10.1108/S0573-8555(2009)0000288016 · DOI
  38. 10.1111/1475-4991.00092 · DOI · Paper page
  39. van Praag B., 1968, Individual welfare functions and consumer behavior
  40. 10.1016/0014-2921(71)90045-6 · DOI
  41. 10.1016/0304-4076(91)90090-Z · DOI
  42. 10.2307/145775 · DOI
  43. Wooldridge J. M., 2010, Econometric Analysis of Cross‐Section and Panel Data

Metadata

Authors
Biewen, M., & Juhasz, A.
Affiliations
  • University of Tübingen (DE)
  • University of Tübingen
Corresponding author
Biewen, Martin
Venue
Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-06-18
Volume
79
Issue
5
Pages
875-905
ISSN
  • 0305-9049 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-0084
OpenAlex
W3169924541
Cited by
28
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1
FWCI
9.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Income, Poverty, and Inequality
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic and Environmental Valuation
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Quality of Life Measurement
Keywords
household equivalence scales, income satisfaction, income dependence, economies of scale, household composition, household size, family households

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Direct Estimation of Equivalence Scales and More Evidence on Independence of Base. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/obes.12166
The paper
Biewen, M., & Juhasz, A. (2017). Direct Estimation of Equivalence Scales and More Evidence on Independence of Base. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics. https://doi.org/10.1111/obes.12166