Cited by 85Gestational Diabetes Research and ManagementObesity, Physical Activity, DietMaternal and Neonatal Healthcare

What characteristics of nutrition and physical activity interventions are key to effectively reducing weight gain in obese or overweight pregnant women? A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Yeo, SeonAe, Walker, Jennifer S., Caughey, Melissa C., Ferraro, Amanda M., Asafu‐Adjei, Josephine K.·2017·Obesity Reviews

Abstract

Lifestyle interventions targeting gestational weight gain (GWG) report varying degrees of success. To better understand factors influencing efficacy, we reviewed randomized trials specifically among obese and overweight pregnant women. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review and a meta-analysis of 32 studies with a pooled population of 5,869 overweight or obese pregnant women. Random effects models were fit to compute the weighted mean difference (WMD) in GWG between groups across studies. Subgroup analyses were conducted to compare intervention efficacy in overweight vs. obese pregnant women, and interventions delivered by prenatal care providers (PCPs) vs. non-PCPs during pregnancy. Moderator analyses ensured. RESULTS: Nine (28%) of 32 studies reported significant reductions in GWG in response to intervention. Of these, six (66%) of nine were delivered by PCPs. Overall, the WMD in GWG was -1.71 (95% confidence interval [CI]: -2.55, -0.86) kg. However, interventions delivered by PCPs yielded a significantly greater reduction in GWG compared to interventions delivered by non-PCPs (WMD = -3.88 kg; 95% CI: -7.01, -0.75 vs. -0.80 kg; 95% CI: -1.32, -0.28; p for difference = 0.005). CONCLUSION: When PCPs counsel nutrition and physical activity, obese and overweight pregnant women have greater success meeting GWG targets and may be more motivated to modify their behaviour than with other modes of intervention deliveries.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/obr.12511

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yeo, S., Walker, J. S., Caughey, M. C., Ferraro, A. M., & Asafu‐Adjei, J. K.
Affiliations
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
  • School of Public Health, Department of Biostatistics University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Chapel Hill NC USA
Corresponding author
Yeo, SeonAe
Venue
Obesity Reviews
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-02-08
Volume
18
Issue
4
Pages
385-399
ISSN
  • 1467-7881 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-789X
OpenAlex
W2586615091
Cited by
85
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 3
FWCI
1.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Obesity Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (1UL1TR001111)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (P30DK093002)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare
Keywords
gestational weight gain, maternal obesity, overweight in pregnancy, lifestyle intervention, nutrition counseling, physical activity counseling, prenatal care providers, intervention delivery mode, weight gain reduction
MeSH terms
Diet, Female, Humans, Obesity, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Complications, Prenatal Care, Weight Gain, Exercise, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Treatment Outcome, Pregnant People, Pregnant Women, Maternal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena, Overweight

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review