Cited by 92Diet and metabolism studiesDietary Effects on HealthNutritional Studies and Diet

Impacts of carbohydrate‐restricted diets on micronutrient intakes and status: A systematic review

Open access
Churuangsuk, Chaitong, Griffiths, Daniel, Lean, Michael E.J., Combet, Emilie·2019·Obesity Reviews

Abstract

Summary: A systematic review of published evidence on micronutrient intake/status with carbohydrate‐restricted diets (CRD) was conducted in Web of Science, Medline, Embase, Scopus, CENTRAL, and ClinicalTrials.gov up to October 2018. We identified 10 studies: seven randomized controlled trials (RCTs) (“Atkins”‐style, n = 5; “Paleolithic” diets, n = 2), two Atkins‐style noncontrolled trials and one cross‐sectional study. Prescribed carbohydrate varied 4% to 34% of energy intake. Only one noncontrolled trial prescribed multivitamin supplements. Dietary intakes/status were reported over 2 to 104 weeks, with weight losses from 2 to 9 kg. No diagnoses of deficiency were reported. Intakes of thiamine, folate, magnesium, calcium, iron, and iodine all decreased significantly (−10% to −70% from baseline) with any CRD types. Atkins diet trials (n = 6; 4%‐34%E carbohydrate) showed inconsistent changes in vitamin A, E, and β‐carotene intakes, while a single “Paleolithic” diet trial (28%E carbohydrate) reported increases in these micronutrients. One other “Paleolithic” diet (30%E carbohydrate) reported a rise in moderate iodine deficiency from 15% to 73% after 6 months. In conclusion, few studies have assessed the impacts of CRD on micronutrients. Studies with different designs point towards reductions in several vitamins and minerals, with potential risk of micronutrient inadequacies. Trial reporting standards are expected to include analysis of micronutrient intake/status. Micronutrients in foods and/or supplements should be considered when designing, prescribing or following CRDs.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/obr.12857

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Churuangsuk, C., Griffiths, D., Lean, M. E. J., & Combet, E.
Affiliations
University of Glasgow (GB)
Corresponding author
Combet, Emilie
Venue
Obesity Reviews
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2019-04-22
Volume
20
Issue
8
Pages
1132-1147
ISSN
  • 1467-7881 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-789X
OpenAlex
W2924487770
Cited by
92
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 36 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 2
FWCI
0.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Obesity Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Prince of Songkla University
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Diet and metabolism studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Dietary Effects on Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
Keywords
low-carbohydrate diet, micronutrient intake, micronutrient status, Atkins diet, Paleolithic diet, thiamine, folic acid, magnesium, calcium, iron, iodine deficiency, vitamin A, vitamin E, beta-carotene, multivitamins, weight loss
MeSH terms
Body Weight, Energy Intake, Humans, Nutritional Status, Micronutrients, Diet, Carbohydrate-Restricted

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review