Cited by 56Oral microbiology and periodontitis researchOrthodontics and Dentofacial OrthopedicsDental Research and COVID-19

Effect of orthodontic treatment on the subgingival microbiota: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Open access
Papageorgiou, Spyridon N., Xavier, Guilherme M., Cobourne, Martyn T., Eliades, Theodore·2018·Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research

Abstract

The aim of this systematic review was to assess qualitative changes induced by fixed appliance orthodontic treatment on the subgingival microbiota. Seven databases were searched up to August 2017 for randomized and nonrandomized clinical studies assessing the effect of orthodontic appliances on the subgingival bacteria in human patients. After elimination of duplicate studies, data extraction and risk of bias assessment according to the Cochrane guidelines, random‐effects meta‐analyses of relative risks (RR) and their 95% confidence intervals (CI s) were performed. According to controlled studies, the presence of Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans in the subgingival crevicular fluid of orthodontic patients was increased 3‐6 months after fixed appliance insertion compared to untreated patients (2 studies; RR = 15.54; 95% CI = 3.19‐75.85). There was still increased subgingival prevalence of Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans (3 studies; RR = 3.98; 95% CI = 1.23‐12.89) and Tannerella forsythia in orthodontic patients up to 6 months after appliance removal compared to untreated patients. However, caution is warranted due to high risk of bias and imprecision. Insertion of orthodontic fixed appliances seems to be associated with a qualitative change of subgingival microbiota, which reverts to some extent back to normal in the first months after appliance removal. However, there is limited evidence on the timing and extent of these changes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/ocr.12237

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Papageorgiou, S. N., Xavier, G. M., Cobourne, M. T., & Eliades, T.
Affiliations
  • University of Zurich (CH)
  • King's College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Papageorgiou, Spyridon N.
Venue
Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-07-20
Volume
21
Issue
4
Pages
175-185
ISSN
  • 1601-6335 (ISSN-L)
  • 1601-6343
OpenAlex
W2883968820
Cited by
56
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4
FWCI
0.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Orthodontics and Craniofacial Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Periodontics › Oral microbiology and periodontitis research
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Orthodontics › Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › General Dentistry › Dental Research and COVID-19
Keywords
fixed orthodontic appliances, subgingival microbiota, Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans, Tannerella forsythia, periodontal pathogens, orthodontic treatment, periodontal disease
MeSH terms
Tannerella forsythia, Orthodontic Appliances, Fixed, Dental Plaque, Gingiva, Gingival Crevicular Fluid, Humans, Orthodontic Appliances, Orthodontics, Corrective, Databases, Factual, Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans, Bacterial Load, Microbiota

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review