The future of public administration research: An editor's perspective
Open accessAbstract
Research in the field of public administration has changed and advanced significantly in recent years. These advancements concern both how we engage in research—such as the methods we apply, the interdisciplinary nature of the theories we use, and the research questions we ask. Increasingly, we are witnessing a shift in public‐sector values away from efficiency and effectiveness and toward a paradigm that highlights equity. In this article, we reflect on these changes from our position as editors‐in‐chief of some of the leading journals in the field. In addition to describing the progress of this discipline, we explore emerging windows of opportunity for new research. One such window is research on ways to incorporate interdisciplinary perspectives and methods. We also see the need for work in such areas as social equity, comparative administration, artificial intelligence, and climate change. Finally, we argue for a more proactive approach in disseminating research to those involved in the day‐to‐day decision‐making processes of public organizations.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Social justice has frequently been overlooked in traditional budgeting processes, which have typically stressed efficiency and effectiveness over equity.
“Within the broader public budgeting literature, social justice has frequently been overlooked in traditional budgeting processes, which have typically stressed efficiency and effectiveness over equity (Grossi et al. 2023;McDonald et al. 2022).”
From Participatory Budgeting for Social Equity: A Comparative Analysis (2025) · cites this paper as McDonald et al. 2022
Cites
INNOVATION IN THE PUBLIC SECTOR: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND FUTURE RESEARCH AGENDA
DE VRIES, H., BEKKERS, V., & TUMMERS, L. (2016) · Public Administration · doi:10.1111/padm.12209 · Cited by 1,214 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Budgeting for Social Equity: Exploring the (Nearly) Unknown
McDonald III, B. D., & McCandless, S. A. (2025) · Journal of Social Equity and Public Administration · doi:10.24926/jsepa.v3i1.4661 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Participatory Budgeting for Social Equity: A Comparative Analysis
Taylor, C. R., Afshan, S., & Lawrence, K. L. (2025) · Public Administration · doi:10.1111/padm.13055 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
“…is no theory of bud-geting for social equity, scholars have called for more research to understand how public budgeting principles and processes intersect with social equity (Blessett et al. 2019; McDonald et al. 2022; McDonald and McCandless 2025; McDonald et al. 2024; Wooldridge et al. 2024).”
Cao, X., Lin, Y.-J., Zhang, J.-H., Tang, Y.-P., Zhang, M.-P., & Gao, H.-Y. (2025) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-025-13339-5 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
- Authors
- McDonald, B. D., Hall, J. L., O'Flynn, J., & van Thiel, S.
- Affiliations
- North Carolina State University (US)
- University of Central Florida (US)
- Melbourne School of Government University of Melbourne Parkville Victoria Australia
- School of Social and Behavioural Sciences Erasmus University Rotterdam Rotterdam The Netherlands
- Corresponding author
- McDonald, Bruce D.
- Venue
- Public Administration
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2022-01-31
- Volume
- 100
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 59-71
- ISSN
- 0033-3298 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-9299
- OpenAlex
- W4207080398
- Cited by
- 138
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 26 · 2025: 36 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 34 · 2022: 14
- FWCI
- 43.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Public Administration (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Public Administration › Public Policy and Administration Research
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Public Administration and Governance
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Public Administration and Political Analysis
- Keywords
- public administration research, research paradigms, efficiency and effectiveness, interdisciplinary research, social equity, comparative public administration, artificial intelligence in public administration, climate governance, research dissemination, public decision-making
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review