Cited by 171Family Dynamics and RelationshipsReproductive Health and ContraceptionDemographic Trends and Gender Preferences

Pandemic Roller‐Coaster? Birth Trends in Higher‐Income Countries During the COVID‐19 Pandemic

Open access
Sobotka, Tomáš, Zeman, Kryštof, Jasilioniene, Aiva, Winkler‐Dworak, Maria, Brzozowska, Zuzanna, Alustiza‐Galarza, Ainhoa, Németh, László, Jdanov, Dmitri·2024·Population and Development Review

Abstract

We use monthly birth data collected by the Human Fertility Database to analyze the impact of the COVID‐19 pandemic on birth trends until September 2022 in 38 higher‐income countries. We also present estimates of the monthly total fertility rate adjusted for seasonality. Our analysis reveals that the pandemic led to distinct swings in births and fertility rates. The initial pandemic shock was associated with a fall in births in most countries, with the sharpest drop in January 2021. Next, birth rates showed a short‐term recovery in March 2021, following the conceptions after the end of the first wave of the pandemic. Most countries reported a stable or slightly increasing number of births in the subsequent months, especially in autumn 2021. Yet another, quite unexpected, downturn in births started in January 2022, linked with the conceptions in spring 2021 when the pandemic measures were mostly eased out and vaccination was gaining momentum. Taken together and contrary to some initial expectations, the coronavirus pandemic did not bring a lasting “baby bust” in most of the analyzed countries. Especially the Nordic countries, the Netherlands, Germany, and the United States experienced an improvement in their birth dynamics in 2021 compared with the prepandemic period.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/padr.12544

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Following the COVID-19 pandemic, which featured a short-term fertility bust in many countries, most of these countries have experienced a rebound even beyond prepandemic levels.

    “Following the pandemic, which featured a short-term fertility bust in many countries (Aassve et al. 2021), most of these countries have experienced a rebound even beyond prepandemic levels (Sobotka et al. 2023).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sobotka, T., Zeman, K., Jasilioniene, A., Winkler‐Dworak, M., Brzozowska, Z., Alustiza‐Galarza, A., Németh, L., & Jdanov, D.
Corresponding author
Jasilioniene, Aiva
Venue
Population and Development Review
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2023-04-25
Volume
50
Issue
S1
Pages
23-58
ISSN
  • 0098-7921 (ISSN-L)
  • 1728-4457
OpenAlex
W4366991404
Cited by
171
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 127 · 2023: 12
FWCI
99.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Population and Development Review (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Econstor (Econstor) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Family Dynamics and Relationships
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Health and Contraception
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Demographic Trends and Gender Preferences
Keywords
COVID-19 pandemic, fertility trends, fertility, total fertility rate, seasonal adjustment, baby bust, conception, vaccination, pandemic control measures, Nordic countries

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review