Pandemic Roller‐Coaster? Birth Trends in Higher‐Income Countries During the COVID‐19 Pandemic
Open accessAbstract
We use monthly birth data collected by the Human Fertility Database to analyze the impact of the COVID‐19 pandemic on birth trends until September 2022 in 38 higher‐income countries. We also present estimates of the monthly total fertility rate adjusted for seasonality. Our analysis reveals that the pandemic led to distinct swings in births and fertility rates. The initial pandemic shock was associated with a fall in births in most countries, with the sharpest drop in January 2021. Next, birth rates showed a short‐term recovery in March 2021, following the conceptions after the end of the first wave of the pandemic. Most countries reported a stable or slightly increasing number of births in the subsequent months, especially in autumn 2021. Yet another, quite unexpected, downturn in births started in January 2022, linked with the conceptions in spring 2021 when the pandemic measures were mostly eased out and vaccination was gaining momentum. Taken together and contrary to some initial expectations, the coronavirus pandemic did not bring a lasting “baby bust” in most of the analyzed countries. Especially the Nordic countries, the Netherlands, Germany, and the United States experienced an improvement in their birth dynamics in 2021 compared with the prepandemic period.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Following the COVID-19 pandemic, which featured a short-term fertility bust in many countries, most of these countries have experienced a rebound even beyond prepandemic levels.
“Following the pandemic, which featured a short-term fertility bust in many countries (Aassve et al. 2021), most of these countries have experienced a rebound even beyond prepandemic levels (Sobotka et al. 2023).”
From Fertility in High-Income Countries: Trends, Patterns, Determinants, and Consequences (2024) · cites this paper as Sobotka et al. 2023
Cites
Santomauro, D. F., Mantilla Herrera, A. M., Shadid, J., Zheng, P., Ashbaugh, C., Pigott, D. M., Abbafati, C., Adolph, C., Amlag, J. O., Aravkin, A. Y., et al. (2021) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(21)02143-7 · Cited by 5,444 · see citing works
Economic Recession and Fertility in the Developed World
Sobotka, T., Skirbekk, V., & Philipov, D. (2011) · Population and Development Review · doi:10.1111/j.1728-4457.2011.00411.x · Cited by 863 · see citing works
Self-citationA reflection on economic uncertainty and fertility in Europe: The Narrative Framework
Vignoli, D., Guetto, R., Bazzani, G., Pirani, E., & Minello, A. (2020) · Genus · doi:10.1186/s41118-020-00094-3 · Cited by 332 · see citing works
Can Policies Stall the Fertility Fall? A Systematic Review of the (Quasi‐) Experimental Literature
Bergsvik, J., Fauske, A., & Hart, R. K. (2021) · Population and Development Review · doi:10.1111/padr.12431 · Cited by 259 · see citing works
The impact of COVID-19 on fertility plans in Italy, Germany, France, Spain, and the United Kingdom
Luppi, F., Arpino, B., & Rosina, A. (2020) · Demographic Research · doi:10.4054/demres.2020.43.47 · Cited by 188 · see citing works
Spreading Uncertainty, Shrinking Birth Rates: A Natural Experiment for Italy
Comolli, C. L., & Vignoli, D. (2021) · European Sociological Review · doi:10.1093/esr/jcab001 · Cited by 172 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Fertility in High-Income Countries: Trends, Patterns, Determinants, and Consequences
Bloom, D. E., Kuhn, M., & Prettner, K. (2024) · Annual Review of Economics · doi:10.1146/annurev-economics-081523-013750 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Fertility in High-Income Countries: Trends, Patterns, Determinants, and Consequences
Bloom, D. E., Kuhn, M., & Prettner, K. (2023) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4597716 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
- Authors
- Sobotka, T., Zeman, K., Jasilioniene, A., Winkler‐Dworak, M., Brzozowska, Z., Alustiza‐Galarza, A., Németh, L., & Jdanov, D.
- Corresponding author
- Jasilioniene, Aiva
- ORCID
- Venue
- Population and Development Review
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2023-04-25
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- S1
- Pages
- 23-58
- ISSN
- 0098-7921 (ISSN-L)
- 1728-4457
- OpenAlex
- W4366991404
- Cited by
- 171
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 127 · 2023: 12
- FWCI
- 99.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Population and Development Review (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- Econstor (Econstor) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Demography › Family Dynamics and Relationships
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Health and Contraception
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Demographic Trends and Gender Preferences
- Keywords
- COVID-19 pandemic, fertility trends, fertility, total fertility rate, seasonal adjustment, baby bust, conception, vaccination, pandemic control measures, Nordic countries
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review