Cited by 16Dermatology and Skin DiseasesNursing care and researchDermatological diseases and infestations

Effects of a self-efficacy theory-based parental education program on eczema control and parental outcomes

Cheng, Nam Sze, Chau, Janita Pak Chun, Lo, Suzanne Hoi Shan, Choi, Kai Chow, Hon, Kam Lun Ellis, Lam, Pok Hong, Leung, Ting Fan·2021·Pediatric Allergy and Immunology

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Eczema is the most common childhood skin problem worldwide. Education that enhances parental self-efficacy in carrying out appropriate eczema management is crucial to controlling eczema symptoms of their children. However, the lack of such a structured education program hinders everyday lives of eczematous children and their families. This study evaluated the effects of a self-efficacy theory-based parental eczema education program in controlling eczema of Chinese children at three months after commencement of intervention. METHODS: An assessor-blind, 2-arm, randomized controlled trial was conducted at an outpatient clinic of a regional hospital. One hundred and thirty-six Chinese children aged 3 months to 12 years with physician-diagnosed eczema, and their parents were recruited. The intervention was underpinned by the Social Cognitive Theory. Children's disease severity, parental self-efficacy, treatment adherence, and quality of life of family members were assessed by validated tools. Generalized estimating equation model was employed to compare differential change in each outcome across time between different groups. RESULTS: Eczema severity of children and parental self-efficacy in the intervention group were found to show greater improvement at 3-month follow-up with regression coefficient (β) -16.98 (95% CI, -21.04 to -12.92; P < .001) and β 29.39 (95% CI, 22.64-36.14; P < .001), respectively. Nearly all parents (97%) receiving the intervention rated this program as useful and helpful. CONCLUSIONS: This program is effective in enhancing parents' self-efficacy in managing their children's eczema and improving their adherence to eczema treatment and quality of life.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/pai.13421

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Authors
Cheng, N. S., Chau, J. P. C., Lo, S. H. S., Choi, K. C., Hon, K. L. E., Lam, P. H., & Leung, T. F.
Affiliations
Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK)
Corresponding author
Chau, Janita Pak Chun
Venue
Pediatric Allergy and Immunology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2020-12-04
Volume
32
Issue
3
Pages
535-543
ISSN
  • 0905-6157 (ISSN-L)
  • 1399-3038
OpenAlex
W3107588387
Cited by
16
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2
FWCI
1.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Pediatric Allergy and Immunology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Dermatology and Skin Diseases
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Nursing care and research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Dermatological diseases and infestations
Keywords
pediatric atopic dermatitis, parental self-efficacy, parental education programs, eczema management, medication adherence, family quality of life, eczema severity, social cognitive theory, Chinese children
MeSH terms
Child, Eczema, Family, Humans, Parents, Quality of Life, Self Efficacy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review