Cited by 23Philosophy and Theoretical ScienceEpistemology, Ethics, and MetaphysicsPhilosophy of Biology and Scientific Explanation

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Posteriori Physicalism and Introspection

Elpidorou, Andreas·2016·Pacific Philosophical Quarterly

Abstract

Introspection presents our phenomenal states in a manner otherwise than physical. This observation is often thought to amount to an argument against physicalism: if introspection presents phenomenal states as they essentially are, then phenomenal states cannot be physical states, for we are not introspectively aware of phenomenal states as physical states. In this article, I examine whether this argument threatens a posteriori physicalism. I argue that as along as proponents of a posteriori physicalism maintain that phenomenal concepts present the nature of their referents in a partial and incomplete manner, a posteriori physicalism is safe.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/papq.12068

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • It is fallacious to infer a property's inapplicability to consciousness from its introspective unavailability.

    “and it is fallacious to infer a property’s inapplicability to consciousness from its introspective unavailability (see, e.g., Williford, 2007; Elpidorou, 2016).”

    From The Projective Consciousness Model and Phenomenal Selfhood (2018) · cites this paper as Elpidorou, 2016

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 53

  1. Armstrong D. M., 1968, A Materialist Theory of the Mind
  2. 10.1111/j.0029-4624.2005.00500.x · DOI
  3. 10.1111/j.1933-1592.2011.00541.x · DOI
  4. Balog K., 2012, Identity Theory
  5. 10.1007/BF00372777 · DOI
  6. 10.1111/j.1933-1592.2004.tb00343.x · DOI
  7. Chalmers D., 1996, The Conscious Mind: In Search of a Fundamental Theory
  8. 10.2307/2653685 · DOI
  9. Chalmers D., 2004, There's Something About Mary: Essays on Phenomenal Consciousness and Frank Jackson's Knowledge Argument, 269
  10. Chalmers D., 2006, Phenomenal Concepts and Phenomenal Knowledge: New Essays on Consciousness and Physicalism
  11. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195311105.001.0001 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Dennett D., 1991, Consciousness Explained
  13. 10.1080/00048400802215638 · DOI
  14. 10.1093/mind/fzq073 · DOI
  15. 10.1111/rati.12018 · DOI
  16. Elpidorou A.(2013a).On Sensible Matters: A Defense of Conceptual Dualism. Dissertation. Boston University.
  17. 10.1007/s11406-013-9455-0 · DOI
  18. Elpidorou A., 2015, Oxford Online Bibliographies
  19. 10.1080/00048401003649617 · DOI
  20. 10.1023/A:1017911200883 · DOI
  21. 10.2307/2653682 · DOI
  22. 10.1017/CBO9780511804274 · DOI
  23. Hurley S., 1998, Consciousness in Action
  24. 10.1093/mind/102.408.555 · DOI
  25. 10.1017/CBO9780511570797.016 · DOI
  26. 10.2307/2960077 · DOI · Paper page
  27. 10.2307/2026143 · DOI
  28. Jackson F., 1998, From Metaphysics to Ethics: A Defence of Conceptual Analysis
  29. Kaplan D., 1989, Themes from Kaplan, 567
  30. Kripke S., 1971, Identity and Individuation, 135
  31. Kripke S., 1980, Naming and Necessity
  32. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199730155.001.0001 · DOI
  33. 10.1111/j.1933-1592.2002.tb00161.x · DOI
  34. Levin J., 2006, Phenomenal Concepts and Phenomenal Knowledge: New Essays on Consciousness and Physicalism, 87
  35. 10.1111/j.1468-0114.1983.tb00207.x · DOI · Paper page
  36. Levine J., 2006, Phenomenal Concepts and Phenomenal Knowledge: New Essays on Consciousness and Physicalism, 145
  37. 10.1093/0195132351.001.0001 · DOI
  38. Loar B., 1997, The Nature of Consciousness: Philosophical Debates
  39. 10.1111/1533-6077.00008 · DOI
  40. Loar B., 2007, Situating Semantics: Essays on the Philosophy of John Perry, 451, 10.7551/mitpress/7384.003.0014 · DOI
  41. 10.1017/CBO9780511570797.017 · DOI
  42. 10.1017/CBO9780511498817 · DOI
  43. 10.1111/j.1747-9991.2008.00163.x · DOI
  44. Nida‐Rümelin M., 2006, Phenomenal Concepts and Phenomenal Knowledge: New Essays on Consciousness and Physicalism
  45. 10.1093/0199243824.001.0001 · DOI · Paper page
  46. Papineau D., 2006, Phenomenal Concepts and Phenomenal Knowledge: New Essays on Consciousness and Physicalism, 111
  47. 10.7551/mitpress/4077.001.0001 · DOI
  48. Salmon N., 1981, Reference and Essence
  49. 10.2307/2678473 · DOI
  50. 10.1111/j.0268-1064.2005.00296.x · DOI
  51. 10.4324/9780203856307 · DOI
  52. Tye M., 2000, Consciousness, Colour and Content, 10.7551/mitpress/2110.001.0001 · DOI
  53. Tye M., 2009, Consciousness Revisited: Materialism Without Phenomenal Concepts

Cited by

Sorted by citations

  • The Projective Consciousness Model and Phenomenal Selfhood

    Williford, K., Bennequin, D., Friston, K., & Rudrauf, D. (2018) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02571 · Cited by 78

    “Its scope is correspondingly widened by what is phenomenologically unavailable; and it is fallacious to infer a property’s inapplicability to consciousness from its introspective unavailability (see, e.g., Williford, 2007; Elpidorou, 2016).”
    Background

Metadata

Authors
Elpidorou, A.
Affiliations
University of Louisville (US)
Corresponding author
Elpidorou, Andreas
Venue
Pacific Philosophical Quarterly
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-03-31
Volume
97
Issue
4
Pages
474-500
ISSN
  • 0031-5621 (ISSN-L)
  • 0279-0750
  • 1468-0114
OpenAlex
W1821038517
Cited by
23
References
2
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4
FWCI
5.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Pacific philosophical quarterly (publishedVersion)
  • PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Philosophy of Biology and Scientific Explanation
Keywords
self-reflection, phenomenal concepts, phenomenal states, phenomenal consciousness, physicalism

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review