Cited by 21Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and PostpartumMindfulness and Compassion InterventionsPersonality Disorders and Psychopathology

Self‐compassion and complete perinatal mental health in women at high risk for postpartum depression: The mediating role of emotion regulation difficulties

Carona, Carlos, Xavier, Sandra, Canavarro, Maria Cristina, Fonseca, Ana·2022·Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice

Abstract

Objectives There is evidence suggesting that self-compassion is linked to key mechanisms in emotion regulation models of depression and anxiety. However, the majority of prior research has targeted community samples and overlooked the analysis of such mechanisms in relation to positive mental health. This study sought to examine the direct and indirect effects, via emotion regulation difficulties, of self-compassion on the complete mental health outcomes of women at high risk for postpartum depression (PPD). Design Cross-sectional, correlational study. Methods The sample for this study comprised 1053 postpartum women presenting high risk for PPD, as determined by the clinical cut-off score obtained through the Postpartum Depression Predictors Inventory-Revised. The assessment protocol further included self-report measures of self-compassion, depression and anxiety symptoms, flourishing and emotion regulation difficulties. Correlation analyses were conducted to ascertain associations between variables, and path analysis was performed to examine direct and indirect effects. Results Difficulties in emotion regulation mediated the links between self-compassion and negative (distress) and positive (flourishing) mental health outcomes. The overall mediation model explained 48% and 39% of variance for psychological distress and flourishing/positive mental health respectively. Conclusions These findings support the applicability of an emotion regulation model of self-compassion to wo…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/papt.12388

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Carona, C., Xavier, S., Canavarro, M. C., & Fonseca, A.
Affiliations
  • University of Coimbra (PT)
  • Center for Research in Neuropsychology and Cognitive and Behavioral Intervention Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences University of Coimbra Coimbra Portugal
Corresponding author
Carona, Carlos
Venue
Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2022-02-10
Volume
95
Issue
2
Pages
561-574
ISSN
  • 1476-0835 (ISSN-L)
  • 2044-8341
OpenAlex
W4211160691
Cited by
21
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 6
FWCI
3.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychology and Psychotherapy Theory Research and Practice (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Universidade de Coimbra (UIDB/PSI/00730/2020)
  • Federación Española de Enfermedades Raras
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
Keywords
self-compassion, postpartum depression, perinatal mental health, emotional dysregulation, eudaimonia, positive mental health, psychological distress, mediation
MeSH terms
Emotional Regulation, Self-Compassion, Cross-Sectional Studies, Depression, Empathy, Female, Humans, Mental Health, Pregnancy, Depression, Postpartum

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review