Cited by 87Local Government Finance and DecentralizationFiscal Policies and Political EconomyElectoral Systems and Political Participation

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Does Participatory Budgeting Change the Share of Public Funding to Low Income Neighborhoods?

Shybalkina, Iuliia, Bifulco, Robert·2019·Public Budgeting & Finance

Abstract

Using a newly compiled dataset, we measure the effects of participatory budgeting on the allocation of capital funding among areas of different income levels within New York City council districts. A difference‐in‐differences design compares changes in the allocation of funding in adopting districts before and after the adoption of participatory budgeting to changes over the same period among a control group consisting of later adopters. On average, adopting districts increase funding in the next to the lowest income census tracts more than the control group, but participatory budgeting does not redirect funds to the lowest income census tracts.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/pbaf.12212

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 38

  1. 10.1016/S0047-2727(01)00084-6 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1016/j.worlddev.2009.05.002 · DOI
  3. Carpini Michael, 1996, What Americans Know About Politics and Why it Matters
  4. Crum Thea, 2013, Building a People's Budget: Draft Research and Evaluation Report on the 2012‐2013 Participatory Budgeting Process in Chicago
  5. Crum Thea, 2015, Building a People's Budget: Draft Research and Evaluation Report on the 2013‐2014 Participatory Budgeting Process in Chicago
  6. 10.1086/257897 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780199604432.001.0001 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00667.x · DOI · Paper page
  9. Ganuza Ernesto, 2012, The Power of Ambiguity: How Participatory Budgeting Travels the Globe, Journal of Public Deliberation, 8
  10. Gilman Hollie Russon, 2016, Democracy Reinvented: Participatory Budgeting and Civic Innovation in America, 10.5040/9780815751199 · DOI
  11. 10.1016/j.worlddev.2013.01.009 · DOI
  12. Hagelskamp Carolin, 2016, A Process of Growth: The Expansion of Participatory Budgeting in the United States and Canada in 2015‐16. Report from Public Agenda
  13. Hagelskamp Carolin, 2016, Why Let the People Decide? Elected Officials on Participatory Budgeting. Report from Public Agenda
  14. 10.1080/07393148.2017.1278855 · DOI
  15. Jaramillo Miguel, 2013, Does Participatory Budgeting Have an Effect on the Quality of Public Services: The Case of Peru's Water and Sanitation Sector, IDB Working Paper Series
  16. Kasdan Alexa, A People's Budget: A Research and Evaluation Report on the Pilot Year of PB in NYC
  17. Kasdan Alexa, A People's Budget: A Research and Evaluation Report on PB in NYC, Cycle 3
  18. Kasdan Alexa, A People's Budget: A Research and Evaluation Report on PB in NYC, Year 2
  19. 10.1177/1043463192004002002 · DOI
  20. 10.23943/princeton/9780691159348.001.0001 · DOI
  21. Lerner Josh, 2012, By the People, for the People: Participatory Budgeting from the Bottom Up in North America, Journal of Public Deliberation, 8
  22. 10.1093/oso/9780190263720.001.0001 · DOI
  23. 10.1177/0486613411418055 · DOI
  24. 10.1257/0895330054048713 · DOI
  25. Mitchel Andy., 1999, The ESRI Guide to GIS Analysis: Geographic Patterns & Relationships (Vol. 1)
  26. 10.1177/0275074013519702 · DOI · Paper page
  27. Understanding NYC's Budget: A Guide to the Capital Budget
  28. Putnam Robert., 2001, Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community
  29. 10.2307/1953324 · DOI
  30. Rosenstone Steven, 1993, Mobilization, Participation, and Democracy in America
  31. 10.1177/153244000700700404 · DOI
  32. 10.1080/07393148.2014.894695 · DOI
  33. 10.1177/0010414013512601 · DOI
  34. 10.2307/j.ctv1pnc1k7 · DOI
  35. Wampler Brian, 2007, Participatory Budgeting in Brazil: Contestation, Cooperation, and Accountability
  36. 10.1057/pol.2012.21 · DOI
  37. Wolfinger Raymond E., 1980, Who Votes
  38. 2008, Toward a More Inclusive and Effective Participatory Budget in Porto Alegre

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 87

Metadata

Authors
Shybalkina, I., & Bifulco, R.
Venue
Public Budgeting & Finance
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-11-26
Volume
39
Issue
1
Pages
45-66
ISSN
  • 0275-1100 (ISSN-L)
  • 1540-5850
OpenAlex
W2901997799
Cited by
87
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 36 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 2
FWCI
28.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Public Budgeting & Finance (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Local Government Finance and Decentralization
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Fiscal Policies and Political Economy
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Electoral Systems and Political Participation
Keywords
participatory budgeting, low-income communities, funding allocation, local government budgeting, community participation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review