The DOI matches its Crossref record; 58 of the 58 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Temperature responses of mesophyll conductance differ greatly between species
Open accessAbstract
The temperature responses of mesophyll conductance (gm) were investigated for nine species using carbon isotope techniques combining tunable diode laser spectroscopy and gas exchange measurements. Species included the evergreen trees Eucalyptus pauciflora and Quercus engelmannii; the tropical evergreen tree Lophostemon confertus; as well as the herbaceous species Nicotiana tabacum, Oryza sativa, Triticum aestivum, Gossypium hirsutum, Glycine max and Arabidopsis thaliana. Responses varied from a two‐ to threefold increase in mesophyll conductance between 15 and 40 °C observed for N. tabacum, G. hirsutum, G. max and E. pauciflora to almost no change in L. confertus and T. aestivum. To account for the different temperature responses between species, we suggest that there must be variation in both the activation energy for membrane permeability and the effective pathlength for liquid phase diffusion. Stomatal conductance was relatively independent of increases in leaf temperature and concomitant increases in leaf to air vapour pressure difference. Two exceptions were Eucalyptus and Gossypium, where stomatal conductance increased with temperature up to 35 °C despite increasing leaf to air vapour pressure. For a given species, temperature responses of stomatal and mesophyll conductance were independent of one another.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A biochemical model of photosynthetic CO2 assimilation in leaves of C3 species
Farquhar, G. D., von Caemmerer, S., & Berry, J. A. (1980) · Planta · doi:10.1007/bf00386231 · Cited by 8,796
Some relationships between the biochemistry of photosynthesis and the gas exchange of leaves
von Caemmerer, S., & Farquhar, G. D. (1981) · Planta · doi:10.1007/bf00384257 · Cited by 4,696
Self-citationBall, J. T., Woodrow, I. E., & Berry, J. A. (1987) · Progress in Photosynthesis Research · doi:10.1007/978-94-017-0519-6_48 · Cited by 2,496
Cramer, W., Bondeau, A., Woodward, F. I., Prentice, I. C., Betts, R. A., Brovkin, V., Cox, P. M., Fisher, V., Foley, J. A., Friend, A. D., et al. (2001) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2486.2001.00383.x · Cited by 2,002
A critical appraisal of a combined stomatal‐photosynthesis model for C3 plants
LEUNING, R. (1995) · Plant, Cell & Environment · doi:10.1111/j.1365-3040.1995.tb00370.x · Cited by 1,572
MEDLYN, B. E., DUURSMA, R. A., EAMUS, D., ELLSWORTH, D. S., PRENTICE, I. C., BARTON, C. V. M., CROUS, K. Y., DE ANGELIS, P., FREEMAN, M., & WINGATE, L. (2011) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2010.02375.x · Cited by 1,343
Biochemical Models of Leaf Photosynthesis
von Caemmerer, S. (2000) · CSIRO Publishing eBooks · doi:10.1071/9780643103405 · Cited by 1,253
The temperature response of C 3 and C 4 photosynthesis
SAGE, R. F., & KUBIEN, D. S. (2007) · Plant, Cell & Environment · doi:10.1111/j.1365-3040.2007.01682.x · Cited by 1,127
Mesophyll conductance to CO2: current knowledge and future prospects
FLEXAS, J., RIBAS‐CARBÓ, M., DIAZ‐ESPEJO, A., GALMÉS, J., & MEDRANO, H. (2008) · Plant, Cell & Environment · doi:10.1111/j.1365-3040.2007.01757.x · Cited by 1,098
Harley, P. C., Loreto, F., Di Marco, G., & Sharkey, T. D. (1992) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.98.4.1429 · Cited by 950
Cited by
Synthetic glycolate metabolism pathways stimulate crop growth and productivity in the field
South, P. F., Cavanagh, A. P., Liu, H. W., & Ort, D. R. (2019) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aat9077 · Cited by 675
Urban, J., Ingwers, M. W., McGuire, M. A., & Teskey, R. O. (2017) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jxb/erx052 · Cited by 486
Drake, J. E., Tjoelker, M. G., Vårhammar, A., Medlyn, B. E., Reich, P. B., Leigh, A., Pfautsch, S., Blackman, C. J., López, R., Aspinwall, M. J., et al. (2018) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/gcb.14037 · Cited by 423
Perdomo, J. A., Capó-Bauçà, S., Carmo-Silva, E., & Galmés, J. (2017) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2017.00490 · Cited by 364
“…gs) and increased leaf resistance to CO2 transport from the atmosphere to the site of carboxylation (i.e., decreased mesophyll conductance, gm), as generally observed under mild to moderate water deficit (WD) (Chaves et al., 2003, 2009; Flexas et al., 2004; von Caemmerer and Evans, 2010).”
BackgroundStomatal conductance increases with rising temperature
Urban, J., Ingwers, M., McGuire, M. A., & Teskey, R. O. (2017) · Plant Signaling & Behavior · doi:10.1080/15592324.2017.1356534 · Cited by 317
Metadata
- Authors
- von CAEMMERER, S., & EVANS, J. R.
- Venue
- Plant, Cell & Environment
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2014-10-21
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 629-637
- ISSN
- 0140-7791 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-3040
- OpenAlex
- W2140411722
- Cited by
- 344
- References
- 58
- FWCI
- 13.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Temperature responses of mesophyll conductance differ greatly between species. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/pce.12449
- The paper
- von CAEMMERER, S., & EVANS, J. R. (2015). Temperature responses of mesophyll conductance differ greatly between species. Plant, Cell & Environment. https://doi.org/10.1111/pce.12449
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
