The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
New insights into an RNAi approach for plant defence against piercing‐sucking and stem‐borer insect pests
Open accessAbstract
Insect double‐stranded (ds)RNA expression in transgenic crops can increase plant resistance to biotic stress; however, creating transgenic crops to defend against every insect pest is impractical. Arabidopsis Mob1A is required for organ growth and reproduction. When Arabidopsis roots were soaked in dsMob1A, the root lengths and numbers were significantly suppressed and plants could not bolt or flower. Twenty‐four hours after rice roots were immersed in fluorescent‐labelled dsEYFP (enhanced yellow fluorescent protein), fluorescence was observed in the rice sheath and stem and in planthoppers feeding on the rice. The expression levels of A go and D icer in rice and planthoppers were induced by dsEYFP. When rice roots were soaked in dsActin, their growth was also significantly suppressed. When planthoppers or A sian corn borers fed on rice or maize that had been irrigated with a solution containing the dsRNA of an insect target gene, the insect's mortality rate increased significantly. Our results demonstrate that dsRNAs can be absorbed by crop roots, trigger plant and insect RNAi and enhance piercing‐sucking and stem‐borer insect mortality rates. We also confirmed that dsRNA was stable under outdoor conditions. These results indicate that the root dsRNA soaking can be used as a bioinsecticide strategy during crop irrigation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mao, Y.-B., Cai, W.-J., Wang, J.-W., Hong, G.-J., Tao, X.-Y., Wang, L.-J., Huang, Y.-P., & Chen, X.-Y. (2007) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt1352 · Cited by 1,358 · cited 1×
“Current dsRNA treatment modes (microinjection, spraying and/or feeding) are particularly popular and appear to be feasible for insects (Araujo et al. 2006; Turner et al. 2006; Baum et al. 2007; Mao et al. 2007; Wang et al. 2011).”
Background
Cited by
Joga, M. R., Zotti, M. J., Smagghe, G., & Christiaens, O. (2016) · Frontiers in Physiology · doi:10.3389/fphys.2016.00553 · Cited by 521
RNA interference technology in crop protection against arthropod pests, pathogens and nematodes
Zotti, M., dos Santos, E. A., Cagliari, D., Christiaens, O., Taning, C. N. T., & Smagghe, G. (2018) · Pest Management Science · doi:10.1002/ps.4813 · Cited by 465
Yan, S., Ren, B., & Shen, J. (2021) · Insect Science · doi:10.1111/1744-7917.12822 · Cited by 303
A Perspective on RNAi-Based Biopesticides
Fletcher, S. J., Reeves, P. T., Hoang, B. T., & Mitter, N. (2020) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2020.00051 · Cited by 300
Yan, S., Qian, J., Cai, C., Ma, Z., Li, J., Yin, M., Ren, B., & Shen, J. (2020) · Journal of Pest Science · doi:10.1007/s10340-019-01157-x · Cited by 281
Metadata
- Authors
- Li, H., Guan, R., Guo, H., & Miao, X.
- Venue
- Plant, Cell & Environment
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2015-05-12
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 2277-2285
- ISSN
- 0140-7791 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-3040
- OpenAlex
- W2162743910
- Cited by
- 217
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: New insights into an RNAi approach for plant defence against piercing‐sucking and stem‐borer insect pests. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/pce.12546
- The paper
- Li, H., Guan, R., Guo, H., & Miao, X. (2015). New insights into an RNAi approach for plant defence against piercing‐sucking and stem‐borer insect pests. Plant, Cell & Environment. https://doi.org/10.1111/pce.12546
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.