Cited by 18Insect-Plant Interactions and ControlInsect behavior and control techniquesLepidoptera: Biology and Taxonomy

The Threat of the Fall Armyworm to Asian Rice Production Is Amplified by the Brown Planthopper

Open access
Xu, Shengliang, Hu, Xiaoyun, Liu, Yuexian, Wang, Xiaolong, Wang, Yanan, Li, Guoping, Turlings, Ted C. J., Li, Yunhe·2025·Plant, Cell & Environment

Abstract

The recent invasion of the fall armyworm (FAW) into Asia not only has had a major impact on maize yield but is feared to also pose a risk to rice production. We hypothesized that the brown planthopper (BPH) may aggravate this risk based on a recently discovered mutualism between the planthopper and the rice striped stem borer. Here we show that BPH may indeed facilitate a shift of FAW to rice. FAW females were found to strongly prefer to oviposit on BPH‐infested rice plants, which emitted significantly elevated levels of five volatile compounds. A synthetic mixture of these compounds had a potent stimulatory effect on ovipositing females. Although FAW caterpillars exhibited relatively poor growth on both uninfested and BPH‐infested rice, a considerable portion completed their development on young plants. Moreover, FAW were found to readily pupate and survive in exceedingly moist soils typical for rice cultivation, further highlighting FAW's potential to switch to rice. We conclude that BPH, by changing the bouquet of volatiles emitted by rice plants, may greatly facilitate this switch. These findings, together with a current increase of nonflooded upland rice in Asia, warrant careful monitoring and specific control measures against FAW to safeguard Asian rice production.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/pce.15194

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The presence of other pests, such as the brown planthopper, can exacerbate the impact of FAW on rice by altering the plant's volatile emissions, making them more attractive to FAW females for oviposition.

    “Studies have also shown that the presence of other pests, such as the brown planthopper, can exacerbate the impact of FAW on rice by altering the plant’s volatile emissions, making them more attractive to FAW females for oviposition53.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Jiang Y., 2019, Observation on Law of Diffusion Damage of Spodoptera frugiperda in China in 2019, Plant Protection, 45, 10
  2. Qin Y., 2020, Potential Economic Loss Assessment of Maize Industry Caused by Fall Armyworm (Spodoptera frugiperda) in China, Plant Protection, 46, 69
  3. Song X., 2022, Water and Fertilizer Management of Rice Cultivation and Rational Selection of Drying Time, Agricultural Machinery Using & Maintenance, 311, 146
  4. Wu Z., 2019, Population Life Tables of Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) Fed on Three Host Plants, Plant Protection, 45, 59
  5. Xu L., 2022, Fall Armyworm Damaging Rice Seedlings in Anhui Province, Plant Protection, 48, 310
  6. Yang J., 2020, In Wuxue, Hubei Province, Armyworm Was Found to Harm Rice Seedlings, China Plant Protection, 40, 44
  7. Zhang H., 2020, A Preliminary Report on Rice Seedling Damage Caused by Spodoptera frugiperda in Yunxiao Grassland of Fujian Province and Biotype Identification of Spodoptera frugiperda, China Plant Protection, 40, 41
  8. Zhang L., 2019, Molecular Characterization Analysis of Fall Armyworm Populations in China, Plant Protection, 45, 20

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Xu, S., Hu, X., Liu, Y., Wang, X., Wang, Y., Li, G., Turlings, T. C. J., & Li, Y.
Affiliations
  • Henan University (CN)
  • Institute of Plant Protection (CN)
  • Henan Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Turlings, Ted C. J.
  • Li, Yunhe
Venue
Plant, Cell & Environment
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2024-10-13
Volume
48
Issue
2
Pages
1060-1072
ISSN
  • 0140-7791 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-3040
OpenAlex
W4403404875
Cited by
18
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 12
FWCI
5.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Plant Cell & Environment (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (32120103009)
  • Henan University
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Insect Science › Insect-Plant Interactions and Control
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Insect Science › Insect behavior and control techniques
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Lepidoptera: Biology and Taxonomy
Keywords
Spodoptera frugiperda, Nilaparvata lugens, rice, host plant shift, oviposition preference, plant volatiles, plant-insect mutualism, rice striped stem borer, caterpillar growth, upland rice, invasive pest, pest control
MeSH terms
Animals, Female, Hemiptera, Larva, Moths, Oviposition, Oryza, Volatile Organic Compounds

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review