Cited by 35Bipolar Disorder and TreatmentPersonality Disorders and PsychopathologySchizophrenia research and treatment

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 31 of the 31 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Effectiveness of cognitive behavioral therapy in treating bipolar disorder: An updated meta‐analysis with randomized controlled trials

Open access
Ye, Bi‐Yu, Jiang, Ze‐Yu, Li, Xuan, Cao, Bo, Cao, Li‐Ping, Lin, Yin, Xu, Gui‐Yun, Miao, Guo‐Dong·2016·Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences

Abstract

Aim: The aim of this updated meta‐analysis was to further assess the effectiveness of cognitive behavioral therapy ( CBT ) in treating bipolar disorder ( BD ). Methods: We carried out a literature search on P ubMed, E mbase, and the C ochrane L ibrary up to O ctober 2015. We calculated the pooled relative risk of relapse rate and standard mean difference ( SMD ) of mean change (data at a follow‐up time‐point – baseline) of the Beck Depression Inventory, Beck Hopelessness Scale, Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression, Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) and Mania Rating Scale scores with their 95% confidence interval (95% CI ). Subgroup analyses based on follow‐up time were performed. Results: Nine randomized controlled trials with 520 bipolar I or II disorder patients were reanalyzed. Overall analysis showed that CBT did not significantly reduce the relapse rate of BD or improve the level of depression. However, significant efficacy of CBT in improving severity of mania was proved based on the YMRS ( SMD = −0.54, 95% CI , −1.03 to −0.06, P = 0.03) but not based on MRS . Subgroup analyses showed that CBT had short‐term efficacy in reducing relapse rate of BD (at 6 months’ follow‐up: relative risk = 0.49, 95% CI : 0.29–0.81, P = 0.006) and improving severity of mania based on YMRS score (post‐treatment: SMD = −0.30, 95% CI , −0.59 to −0.01, P = 0.04). Conclusion: Short‐term efficacy of CBT in reducing relapse rate of BD and improving the severity of mania was proved. But these effects could be weakened by time. In addition, there was no effect of CBT on level of depression in BD .

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/pcn.12399

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • From meta-analyses, effects of CBT on either depressive symptoms or relapse remain uncertain due to important methodological problems and study selection factors.

    “From meta‐analyses, effects on either depressive symptoms or on relapse remain uncertain due to important methodological problems and study selection factors.87, 88, 89”

    From Canadian Network for Mood and Anxiety Treatments ( CANMAT ) and International Society for Bipolar Disorders ( ISBD ) 2018 guidelines for the management of patients with bipolar disorder (2018) · cites this paper as [88]

    The Discussion (page unavailable) reports conflicting findings on depressive symptoms across meta-analyses, differences in included studies and outcome calculations, and limitations including small samples and substantial heterogeneity. The relapse analysis found no significant overall effect, but the paper reports a significant reduction at six months; describing the relapse effect as simply uncertain omits that short-term finding. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Ye, B., Jiang, Z., Li, X., Cao, B., Cao, L., Lin, Y., Xu, G., & Miao, G.
Affiliations
  • Department of Affective Disorders, Guangzhou Huiai Hospital (Guangzhou Psychiatric Hospital) The Affiliated Brain Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University Guangzhou China
  • Guangzhou Psychiatric Hospital (CN)
  • The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (US)
Venue
Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-06-26
Volume
70
Issue
8
Pages
351-361
ISSN
  • 1323-1316 (ISSN-L)
  • 1440-1819
OpenAlex
W2404426701
Cited by
35
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2
FWCI
0.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Medicine & Health Science and Technology Projects of Guangzhou (20121A011091)
  • Guangzhou Huiai Hospital (2015-2016)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
Keywords
cognitive behavioral therapy, bipolar disorder, relapse prevention, mania severity, depression, treatment efficacy, bipolar I disorder, bipolar II disorder, follow-up duration
MeSH terms
Bipolar Disorder, Humans, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Outcome Assessment, Health Care

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review