Cited by 53Diabetes Management and ResearchDiabetes Treatment and ManagementDiabetes and associated disorders

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Insulin degludec's ultra-long pharmacokinetic properties observed in adults are retained in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes: Insulin degludec in children/adolescents

Abstract

Insulin degludec (IDeg) is a basal insulin with an ultra-long pharmacokinetic profile in adults that at steady-state produces remarkably flat and stable insulin levels; however, no studies have yet reported on the pharmacokinetic properties of IDeg in subjects younger than 18 years of age. This was a single-centre, randomised, single-dose, double-blind, two-period crossover trial conducted in children (6-11 years), adolescents (12-17 years), and adults (18-65 years) with type 1 diabetes. Subjects received a single subcutaneous dose of 0.4 U/kg IDeg or insulin glargine (IGlar), respectively, on two separate dosing visits, with pharmacokinetic blood sampling up to 72-h postdose. A total of 37 subjects (12 children, 13 adolescents, and 12 adults) completed the trial. Total exposure of IDeg after a single dose (AUCIDeg ,0-∞, SD ) was higher in children compared to adults [estimated ratio children/adults 1.48 (95% confidence interval, CI: 0.98; 2.24)] and in adolescents compared to adults [estimated ratio adolescents/adults 1.33 (95% CI: 1.08; 1.64)]; however, the difference was only statistically significant for the latter comparison. No statistically significant difference in maximum concentration of IDeg (Cmax, IDeg , SD ) was observed. Estimated ratios for Cmax, IDeg , SD were (children/adults) 1.20 (95% CI: 0.90; 1.60) and (adolescents/adults) 1.23 (95% CI: 1.00; 1.51). Simulated mean steady state pharmacokinetic profiles supported a flat and stable IDeg exposure across a 24-h dosing interval. IDeg was detectable in serum for at least 72 h (end of blood sampling period) in all subjects following single dose. In conclusion, the ultra-long pharmacokinetic properties of IDeg observed in adults are preserved in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/pedi.12116

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Total exposure and maximum concentration of IDeg after a single dose were higher in children and adolescents than in adults, but the difference was only statistically significant for total exposure in adolescents versus adults.

    “the total exposure (AUCIDeg,0–∞,SD) and maximum concentration (C max) of IDeg after a SD (C max,IDeg,SD) were higher in children and adolescents than in adults [estimated ratio for AUCIDeg,0–∞,SD children/adults 1.48 (95 % CI 0.98–2.24) and adolescents/adults 1.33 (95 % CI 1.08–1.64); estimated ratio for C max,IDeg,SD children/adults 1.20 (95 % CI 0.90–1.60) and adolescents/adults 1.23 (95 % CI 1.”
  • A single-centre, randomised, single-dose, double-blind, two-period crossover trial with IDeg was conducted in children (6-11 years), adolescents (12-17 years) and adults (18-65 years) with T1DM.

    “a single-centre, randomised, SD, double-blind, two-period crossover trial with IDeg was conducted in children (6–11 years), adolescents (12–17 years) and adults (18–65 years) with T1DM [29].”
  • Simulated mean steady-state pharmacokinetic profiles supported a flat and stable IDeg exposure across a 24-h dosing interval in all sub-populations.

    “The simulated mean SS pharmacokinetic profiles supported a flat and stable IDeg exposure across a 24-h dosing interval in all of the sub-populations [29].”
  • The pharmacokinetic properties of IDeg observed in adults are preserved in children and adolescents with T1DM.

    “In general, the study found that the pharmacokinetic properties of IDeg observed in adults are preserved in children and adolescents with T1DM.”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 21

  1. Daneman, 2009, State of the world's children with diabetes, Pediatr Diabetes, 10, 120, 10.1111/j.1399-5448.2008.00479.x · DOI
  2. Stanescu, 2012, The epidemiology of type 1 diabetes in children, Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am, 41, 679, 10.1016/j.ecl.2012.08.001 · DOI
  3. Gan, 2012, Type 1 diabetes: current concepts in epidemiology, pathophysiology, clinical care, and research, Curr Probl Pediatr Adolesc Health Care, 42, 269, 10.1016/j.cppeds.2012.07.002 · DOI
  4. The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group, 1993, The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group, N Engl J Med, 329, 977, 10.1056/NEJM199309303291401 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Peyrot, 2009, The DAWN Youth WebTalk Study: methods, findings, and implications, Pediatr Diabetes, 10, 37, 10.1111/j.1399-5448.2009.00612.x · DOI
  6. Burdick, 2004, Missed insulin meal boluses and elevated hemoglobin A1c levels in children receiving insulin pump therapy, Pediatrics, 113, e221, 10.1542/peds.113.3.e221 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Miculis, 2010, Physical activity in children with type 1 diabetes, J Pediatr (Rio J), 86, 271, 10.2223/JPED.2003 · DOI
  8. Rovner, 2009, Are children with type 1 diabetes consuming a healthful diet? A review of the current evidence and strategies for dietary change, Diabetes Educ, 35, 97, 10.1177/0145721708326699 · DOI
  9. Kurtzhals, 2011, Multi-hexamer formation is the underlying basis for the ultra-long glucose-lowering effect of insulin degludec, Diabetologia, 54, S426
  10. Jonassen, 2012, Design of the novel protraction mechanism of insulin degludec, an ultra-long-acting basal insulin, Pharm Res, 29, 2104, 10.1007/s11095-012-0739-z · DOI · Paper page
  11. Heise, 2012, Insulin degludec: four times lower pharmacodynamic variability than insulin glargine under steady-state conditions in type 1 diabetes, Diabetes Obes Metab, 14, 859, 10.1111/j.1463-1326.2012.01627.x · DOI · Paper page
  12. Heise, 2012, Insulin degludec: two-fold longer half-life and a more consistent pharmacokinetic profile than insulin glargine, Endocr Abstr, 28, 188
  13. Ullman, 1996, Luminescent oxygen channeling assay (LOCI): sensitive, broadly applicable homogeneous immunoassay method, Clin Chem, 42, 1518, 10.1093/clinchem/42.9.1518 · DOI
  14. Workgroup on Hypoglycemia, American Diabetes Association, 2005, Defining and reporting hypoglycemia in diabetes: a report from the American Diabetes Association Workgroup on Hypoglycemia, Diabetes Care, 28, 1245, 10.2337/diacare.28.5.1245 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Cole, 2002, A chart to link child centiles of body mass index, weight and height, Eur J Clin Nutr, 56, 1194, 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1601473 · DOI
  16. Danne, 2003, Insulin detemir is characterized by a consistent pharmacokinetic profile across age-groups in children, adolescents, and adults with type 1 diabetes, Diabetes Care, 26, 3087, 10.2337/diacare.26.11.3087 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Danne, 2007, Paediatric diabetes: achieving practical, effective insulin therapy in type 1 and type 2 diabetes, Acta Paediatr, 96, 1560, 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2007.00494.x · DOI
  18. Monaco, 1996, Accuracy of injection site identification among children with insulin dependent diabetes mellitus: a comparison of traditional and new visual aids, Clin Pediatr (Phila), 35, 191, 10.1177/000992289603500403 · DOI
  19. Kordonouri, 2002, Lipohypertrophy in young patients with type 1 diabetes, Diabetes Care, 25, 634, 10.2337/diacare.25.3.634 · DOI
  20. Klein, 2007, Albumin-bound basal insulin analogues (insulin detemir and NN344): comparable time-action profiles but less variability than insulin glargine in type 2 diabetes, Diabetes Obes Metab, 9, 290, 10.1111/j.1463-1326.2006.00685.x · DOI · Paper page
  21. Danne, 2008, Insulin detemir is characterized by a more reproducible pharmacokinetic profile than insulin glargine in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes: results from a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial, Pediatr Diabetes, 9, 554, 10.1111/j.1399-5448.2008.00443.x · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Biester, T., Blaesig, S., Remus, K., Aschemeier, B., Kordonouri, O., Granhall, C., Søndergaard, F., Kristensen, N. R., Haahr, H., & Danne, T.
Affiliations
  • Kinderkrankenhaus auf der Bult (DE)
  • Diabetes Centre for Children and Adolescents; Kinder- und Jugendkrankenhaus auf der Bult; Hannover Germany
  • Novo Nordisk (Denmark) (DK)
Corresponding author
Danne, Thomas
Venue
Pediatric Diabetes
Published
2014-01-28
Volume
15
Issue
1
Pages
27-33
ISSN
1399-543X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1709260067
Cited by
53
References
5
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 4 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 7
FWCI
6.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Pediatric Diabetes (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Sanofi
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Diabetes and associated disorders
Keywords
insulin degludec, type 1 diabetes, pediatric patients, adolescents, pharmacokinetics, ultra-long-acting insulin, insulin glargine
MeSH terms
Insulin Glargine, Adolescent, Adult, Child, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Insulin, Male, Insulin, Long-Acting

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review