Cited by 37Diabetes Management and ResearchPancreatic function and diabetesDiabetes and associated disorders

Continuous glucose monitoring for hypoglycaemia in children: perspectives in 2020

Open access
Worth, Chris, Dunne, Mark, Ghosh, Arunabha, Harper, Simon, Banerjee, Indraneel·2020·Pediatric Diabetes

Abstract

Hypoglycaemia in children is a major risk factor for adverse neurodevelopment with rates as high as 50% in hyperinsulinaemic hypoglycaemia (HH). A key part of management relies upon timely identification and treatment of hypoglycaemia. The current standard of care for glucose monitoring is by infrequent fingerprick plasma glucose testing but this carries a high risk of missed hypoglycaemia identification. High-frequency Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) offers an attractive alternative for glucose trend monitoring and glycaemic phenotyping but its utility remains largely unestablished in disorders of hypoglycaemia. Attempts to determine accuracy through correlation with plasma glucose measurements using conventional methods such as Mean Absolute Relative Difference (MARD) overestimate accuracy at hypoglycaemia. The inaccuracy of CGM in true hypoglycaemia is amplified by calibration algorithms that prioritize hyperglycaemia over hypoglycaemia with minimal objective evidence of efficacy in HH. Conversely, alternative algorithm design has significant potential for predicting hypoglycaemia to prevent neuroglycopaenia and consequent brain dysfunction in childhood disorders. Delays in the detection of hypoglycaemia, alarm fatigue, device calibration and current high cost are all barriers to the wider adoption of CGM in disorders of hypoglycaemia. However, machine learning, artificial intelligence and other computer-generated algorithms now offer significant potential for further improvement in CGM device technology and widespread application in childhood hypoglycaemia.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/pedi.13029

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The accuracy of continuous glucose monitoring during a hypoglycaemia event is variable and dependent on factors such as insulin levels and rapid glucose changes.

    “The accuracy of CGM during a hypoglycaemia event is also variable and dependent on a lot of factors such as insulin levels and rapid glucose changes (64).”

    From Hypoglycaemia in adrenal insufficiency (2023) · cites this paper as [64]

    The supplied passage identifies the review but does not address factors affecting CGM accuracy. Searches for insulin levels, rapid glucose changes, and sensor lag returned no relevant full-text passage, so our available copy cannot verify the attributed explanation. (LLM, conf=0.72)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Worth, C., Dunne, M., Ghosh, A., Harper, S., & Banerjee, I.
Affiliations
  • Royal Manchester Children's Hospital (GB)
  • University of Manchester (GB)
  • St Mary's Hospital (GB)
Corresponding author
Worth, Chris
Venue
Pediatric Diabetes
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2020-05-04
Volume
21
Issue
5
Pages
697-706
ISSN
  • 1399-543X (ISSN-L)
  • 1399-5448
OpenAlex
W3016352282
Cited by
37
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1
FWCI
0.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Locations
  • Pediatric Diabetes (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Dexcom
  • University of Manchester
  • Medical Research Council (MC_PC_18056)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Pancreatic function and diabetes
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Diabetes and associated disorders
Keywords
continuous glucose monitoring, hypoglycemia, children, hyperinsulinemic hypoglycemia, CGM accuracy, calibration algorithm, hypoglycaemia detection, brain development, machine learning, artificial intelligence, alarm fatigue
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Blood Glucose, Child, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Endocrinology, Humans, Hypoglycemia, Insulin, Risk Factors, Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring, History, 21st Century, Neurodevelopmental Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review