Continuous glucose monitoring for hypoglycaemia in children: perspectives in 2020
Open accessAbstract
Hypoglycaemia in children is a major risk factor for adverse neurodevelopment with rates as high as 50% in hyperinsulinaemic hypoglycaemia (HH). A key part of management relies upon timely identification and treatment of hypoglycaemia. The current standard of care for glucose monitoring is by infrequent fingerprick plasma glucose testing but this carries a high risk of missed hypoglycaemia identification. High-frequency Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) offers an attractive alternative for glucose trend monitoring and glycaemic phenotyping but its utility remains largely unestablished in disorders of hypoglycaemia. Attempts to determine accuracy through correlation with plasma glucose measurements using conventional methods such as Mean Absolute Relative Difference (MARD) overestimate accuracy at hypoglycaemia. The inaccuracy of CGM in true hypoglycaemia is amplified by calibration algorithms that prioritize hyperglycaemia over hypoglycaemia with minimal objective evidence of efficacy in HH. Conversely, alternative algorithm design has significant potential for predicting hypoglycaemia to prevent neuroglycopaenia and consequent brain dysfunction in childhood disorders. Delays in the detection of hypoglycaemia, alarm fatigue, device calibration and current high cost are all barriers to the wider adoption of CGM in disorders of hypoglycaemia. However, machine learning, artificial intelligence and other computer-generated algorithms now offer significant potential for further improvement in CGM device technology and widespread application in childhood hypoglycaemia.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The accuracy of continuous glucose monitoring during a hypoglycaemia event is variable and dependent on factors such as insulin levels and rapid glucose changes.
“The accuracy of CGM during a hypoglycaemia event is also variable and dependent on a lot of factors such as insulin levels and rapid glucose changes (64).”
From Hypoglycaemia in adrenal insufficiency (2023) · cites this paper as [64]
The supplied passage identifies the review but does not address factors affecting CGM accuracy. Searches for insulin levels, rapid glucose changes, and sensor lag returned no relevant full-text passage, so our available copy cannot verify the attributed explanation. (LLM, conf=0.72)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Battelino, T., Danne, T., Bergenstal, R. M., Amiel, S. A., Beck, R., Biester, T., Bosi, E., Buckingham, B. A., Cefalu, W. T., Close, K. L., et al. (2019) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dci19-0028 · Cited by 4,032 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The Advanced Technologies and Treatments for Diabetes (ATTD) Congress devised a consensus recommendation for CGM data utilization to try to aim interpretation and standardize use.(77) The development of an auto-”
BackgroundBornstein, S. R., Allolio, B., Arlt, W., Barthel, A., Don-Wauchope, A., Hammer, G. D., Husebye, E. S., Merke, D. P., Murad, M. H., Stratakis, C. A., et al. (2016) · The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1210/jc.2015-1710 · Cited by 1,769 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Hypoglycaemia is considered a rare problem for adults with adrenal insufficiency (AI).(51) However, in those with morning headache or discomfort, overnight CGM revealed hypoglycaemia in 5 out of 6 patients”
BackgroundEffectiveness of Sensor-Augmented Insulin-Pump Therapy in Type 1 Diabetes
Bergenstal, R. M., Tamborlane, W. V., Ahmann, A., Buse, J. B., Dailey, G., Davis, S. N., Joyce, C., Peoples, T., Perkins, B. A., Welsh, J. B., et al. (2010) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1002853 · Cited by 894 · see citing works
A review of personalized blood glucose prediction strategies for T1DM patients
Oviedo, S., Vehí, J., Calm, R., & Armengol, J. (2017) · International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1002/cnm.2833 · Cited by 279 · see citing works
Watanabe, T., Ozawa, A., Ishii, S., Tomaru, T., Shibusawa, N., Saito, T., Yamada, E., Horiguchi, K., Nakajima, Y., Matsumoto, S., et al. (2018) · Endocrine Journal · doi:10.1507/endocrj.ej16-0387 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Hypoglycaemia in adrenal insufficiency
Lee, S. C., Baranowski, E. S., Sakremath, R., Saraff, V., & Mohamed, Z. (2023) · Frontiers in Endocrinology · doi:10.3389/fendo.2023.1198519 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
“The accuracy of CGM during a hypoglycaemia event is also variable and dependent on a lot of factors such as insulin levels and rapid glucose changes (64).”
Background
- Authors
- Worth, C., Dunne, M., Ghosh, A., Harper, S., & Banerjee, I.
- Affiliations
- Royal Manchester Children's Hospital (GB)
- University of Manchester (GB)
- St Mary's Hospital (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Worth, Chris
- Venue
- Pediatric Diabetes
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2020-05-04
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 697-706
- ISSN
- 1399-543X (ISSN-L)
- 1399-5448
- OpenAlex
- W3016352282
- Cited by
- 37
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 0.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- Licence
- Locations
- Pediatric Diabetes (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- Dexcom
- University of Manchester
- Medical Research Council (MC_PC_18056)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Pancreatic function and diabetes
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Diabetes and associated disorders
- Keywords
- continuous glucose monitoring, hypoglycemia, children, hyperinsulinemic hypoglycemia, CGM accuracy, calibration algorithm, hypoglycaemia detection, brain development, machine learning, artificial intelligence, alarm fatigue
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Blood Glucose, Child, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Endocrinology, Humans, Hypoglycemia, Insulin, Risk Factors, Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring, History, 21st Century, Neurodevelopmental Disorders
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review