Cited by 282Diabetes Management and ResearchAdvanced Control Systems OptimizationArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare

A review of personalized blood glucose prediction strategies for T1DM patients

Oviedo, Silvia, Vehí, Josep, Calm, Remei, Armengol, Joaquim·2017·International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering

Abstract

This paper presents a methodological review of models for predicting blood glucose (BG) concentration, risks and BG events. The surveyed models are classified into three categories, and they are presented in summary tables containing the most relevant data regarding the experimental setup for fitting and testing each model as well as the input signals and the performance metrics. Each category exhibits trends that are presented and discussed. This document aims to be a compact guide to determine the modeling options that are currently being exploited for personalized BG prediction.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cnm.2833

Cites

133 of 133 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Algorithms that use CGM data plus external inputs, such as ingested carbohydrates, injected insulin and physical activity, have been shown to enhance prediction performance compared to predictions using only CGM data.

    “While, others use CGM data plus external inputs, such as the amount of ingested carbohydrates, injected insulin and physical activity [52]. These have been shown to enhance the performance of predictions when compared to predictions using only CGM data [53].”
  • Subject-specific glucose prediction algorithms train a different model for each subject to account for the large inter-individual variability characterizing individuals with T1D.

    “Another option is to develop subject-specific algorithms, where a different model is trained for each subject, in order to take into account the large inter-individual variability characterizing individuals with T1D [52].”
  • Most glucose prediction algorithms in the literature approach glucose prediction as a regression problem, seeking to predict interstitial glucose concentration with a prediction horizon typically below 60 min, with 30 min the most frequent.

    “Most of the prediction algorithms in the literature approach the problem of glucose prediction as a regression problem, in other words they seek to predict the value of interstitial glucose concentration with a prediction horizon (PH) typically below 60 min (30 min is the most frequent PH value) [52].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 135 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Oviedo, S., Vehí, J., Calm, R., & Armengol, J.
Affiliations
  • Universitat de Girona (ES)
  • Institut d'Informàtica i Aplicacions Universitat de Girona, Campus Montilivi Edifici P4 17071 Girona Spain
Venue
International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-10-28
Volume
33
Issue
6
ISSN
  • 2040-7939 (ISSN-L)
  • 2040-7947
OpenAlex
W2523526638
Cited by
279
References
135
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 46 · 2020: 34 · 2019: 38 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 8
FWCI
3.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Universitat de Girona Digital Repository (Universitat de Girona) (publishedVersion)
  • Repositori UJI (Universitat Jaume I) (publishedVersion)
  • RECERCAT (Consorci de Serveis Universitaris de Catalunya) (publishedVersion)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
Funders
Spanish Government (ES-2014-068289)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Advanced Control Systems Optimization
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
Keywords
blood glucose prediction, type 1 diabetes, personalized prediction models, diabetes risk prediction, model classification
MeSH terms
Blood Glucose, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Humans, Insulin

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review