Cited by 14

Time trend in excess mortality in children with type 1 diabetes from 1987 to 2016 in mainland France

Donzeau, Aurelie, Piffaretti, Clara, Jossens, Anne, Levaillant, Lucie, Bouhours‐Nouet, Natacha, Amsellem‐Jager, Jessica, Ghosn, Walid, Rey, Grégoire +2 more·2022·Pediatric Diabetes

Abstract

Background Mortality risk for children with type 1 diabetes (T1D) is unknown in France and their causes of death are not well documented. Aim To determine the standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) and causes of death in children aged 1-14 years with T1D from 1987 to 2016. Methods The French Center for Epidemiology on Medical Causes of Death collected all death certificates in mainland France. SMRs, corrected SMRs (accounting for missing cases of deaths unrelated to diabetes), and 95% confidence intervals were calculated. Results Of 146 deaths with the contribution of diabetes, 97 were due to T1D. Mean age at death of the subjects with T1D was 8.8 ± 4.1 years (54% males). The cause of death was diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) in 58% of the cases (70% in subjects 1-4 years), hypoglycemia or dead-in-bed syndrome in 4%, related to diabetes but not described in 24%, and unrelated to diabetes in 14%. The SMRs showed a significant decrease across the years, except for the 1-4 age group. In the last decade (2007-2016), the crude and corrected SMRs were significantly different from 1 in the 1-4 age group (5.4 [2.3; 10.7] and 6.1 [2.8; 11.5]), no longer significant in the 5-9 age group (1.7 [0.6; 4.0] and 2.1 [0.8; 4.5]) and borderline significant in the 10-14 age group (1.7 [0.8; 3.2] and 2.3 [1.2; 4.0]). Conclusions Children with T1D aged 1-4 years still had a high mortality rate. Their needs for early recognition and safe management of diabetes are not being met.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/pedi.13298

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Donzeau, A., Piffaretti, C., Jossens, A., Levaillant, L., Bouhours‐Nouet, N., Amsellem‐Jager, J., Ghosn, W., Rey, G., Fosse‐Edorh, S., & Coutant, R.
Affiliations
  • Pediatric Diabetology University Hospital Angers France
  • Santé publique France The French National Public Health Agency Saint Maurice France
  • Department of Pediatrics St Malo Hospital Saint Malo France
  • Centre for Epidemiology on Medical Causes of Death Inserm‐CépiDc Le Kremlin‐Bicêtre France
Venue
Pediatric Diabetes
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2021-12-19
Volume
23
Issue
1
Pages
38-44
ISSN
  • 1399-543X
  • 1399-5448
Cited by
14
References
1
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review