Insulin pump therapy is associated with higher rates of mild diabetic ketoacidosis compared to injection therapy: A 2‐year Swedish national survey of children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVES: Diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) in type 1 diabetes (T1D) can occur during both insulin pump therapy (continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion, CSII) and insulin injection therapy (multiple daily injections, MDI). The primary aim of this study was to compare CSII and MDI regarding DKA frequency. A secondary aim was to compare metabolic derangement between CSII and MDI at hospital admission for DKA. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Children 0-17.99 years with established T1D admitted for DKA in Sweden from February 1, 2015 to January 31, 2017 were invited to participate. Data regarding demographics, laboratory data, CSII or MDI, and access to ketone meters and CGM were provided through questionnaires and medical records. The Swedish National Diabetes Registry (SWEDIABKIDS) was used to compare the distribution of CSII and MDI in the national population with the population admitted for DKA, using the chi-square goodness-of-fit test. Distribution of CSII and MDI was then categorized in clinical severity grades for mild (pH 7.20-7.29), moderate (pH 7.10-7.29) and severe DKA (pH <7.10). RESULTS: The distribution of CSII at DKA admission was significantly larger than in the national pediatric population with T1D (74.7% vs. 59.7%, p = 0.002). CSII was overrepresented in mild DKA (85.2% vs. with CSII, p < 0.001), but not in moderate/severe DKA (57.9% with CSII, p = 0.82). Mean HbA1c at hospital admission was 73.9 mmol/mol with CSII and 102.7 mmol/mol with MDI. CONCLUSIONS: CSII was associated with higher risk of mild DKA than MDI. MDI was associated with markedly higher HbA1c levels than CSII at hospital admission for DKA.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
In a 2-year Swedish national survey of children with established type 1 diabetes admitted for DKA, insulin pump therapy (CSII) was overrepresented relative to the national pediatric T1D population, but this excess was confined to mild DKA. Children on MDI who developed DKA had markedly higher HbA1c at admission than those on CSII.
Key findings
- Among 99 first DKA admissions, 74/99 (74.7%) used CSII versus 59.7% CSII in the national SWEDIABKIDS pediatric T1D population (p = 0.002).
- CSII was overrepresented in mild DKA (pH 7.20–7.29): 52/61 (85.2%) versus 59.7% nationally (p < 0.001); moderate/severe DKA combined showed no overrepresentation (22/38, 57.9% versus 59.7%, p = 0.82).
- Mean HbA1c at hospital admission was 73.9 mmol/mol with CSII and 102.7 mmol/mol with MDI; HbA1c >70 mmol/mol was seen in 18/19 (94.7%) MDI cases versus 27/55 (49.1%) CSII cases.
- Median pH at admission was 7.25 with CSII and 7.16 with MDI (p < 0.001); in adjusted multivariable regression, only insulin treatment mode had a significant effect on pH, with CSII associated with higher pH (p = 0.028).
Methods
- National prospective study including all children 0–17.99 years with established T1D admitted for DKA in Sweden from February 1, 2015 to January 31, 2017; there were no exclusion criteria, all pediatric centers agreed to participate, and only the first DKA episode was included for children with multiple events.
- Data came from questionnaires completed by parents/caregivers and children ≥15 years and by the attending physician or nurse, supplemented by medical records; SWEDIABKIDS provided national CSII/MDI distribution and patient-years.
- Analyses used chi-square goodness-of-fit to compare DKA CSII/MDI distribution with the national population, Mann–Whitney U tests for pH and HbA1c, and univariate/multivariable regression adjusting for sex, age, ketone meter access, and CGM; DKA severity was graded as mild (pH 7.20–7.29), moderate (pH 7.10–7.19), and severe (pH <7.10).
Limitations
- The paper states that total treatment time from CSII start to DKA admission was impossible to obtain from SWEDIABKIDS, which would have permitted more precise relative risk estimation, and that socioeconomic or ethnic data were not included in analyses.
- The text makes evident possible under-ascertainment of mild DKA if some children self-treated at home and were not admitted; seven small hospitals reported no DKA cases, CSII/MDI usage data were unavailable for the entire study period for children who turned 18 before January 31, 2017, and the observational design lacked randomization.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
7 of 23 cited sources checked · 2 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Hybrid Closed Loop systems that might decrease the risk of DKA were not standard features of CSII treatment at the time of study inclusion.
“Hybrid Closed Loop systems that might decrease the risk of DKA were not standard features of CSII treatment at the time of study inclusion. 22 , 23 , 26”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 3 sources checked- cites [22] Breton MD, Kanapka LG, Beck RW, et al. A randomized trial of closed‐loop control in children with type 1 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2020; 383(9): 836‐ 845. 32846062 PMC7920146 source
The Trial Design and Patients section describes closed-loop control as a separate assigned treatment; control patients used their existing pumps or pumps with a predictive low-glucose suspend feature. This supports the distinction between closed-loop control and the pump treatment used in this trial, but does not establish what was standard in CSII treatment at the citing study’s inclusion date. The Adverse Events section reports no DKA in either group, so this trial cannot show a reduction in DKA risk. (LLM, conf=0.83)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [23] Lee MH, Paldus B, Krishnamurthy B, et al. The clinical case for the integration of a ketone sensor as part of a closed loop insulin pump system. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2019; 13(5): 967‐ 973. 30628470 PMC6955455 source
- cites [26] Tauschmann M, Thabit H, Bally L, et al. Closed‐loop insulin delivery in suboptimally controlled type 1 diabetes: a multicentre, 12‐week randomised trial. Lancet. 2018; 392(10155): 1321‐ 1329. 30292578 PMC6182127 source
The Introduction says the first hybrid closed-loop system entered clinical use in 2017, and Methods > Procedures distinguishes hybrid closed-loop therapy from standard insulin pump therapy in this trial. The paper does not establish that hybrid closed-loop systems decrease DKA risk or whether they were standard features at the citing study’s time of inclusion. Results report one DKA event in the closed-loop group, attributed to infusion-set failure. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Findingown data
CSII was not overrepresented in moderate/severe DKA (57.9% vs 59.7%, p = 0.82).
“but not in moderate/severe DKA (57.9% with CSII, p = 0.82)”
- Also stated in: § Analyses of study data · plain
“When severe and moderate DKA were combined, moderate/severe DKA had a distribution of CSII similar to the national population (57.9% vs. 59.7%, p = 0.82, chi‐square goodness‐of‐fit test, Figure 3).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The DKA cases captured in the study are representative of all DKA cases in Sweden during the study period with respect to insulin delivery mode.
- Rests on an assumption: Treatment mode recorded at admission (CSII or MDI) accurately reflects the patient's insulin delivery mode at the time of DKA.
- Rests on an assumption: The national population distribution of CSII and MDI based on treatment months in SWEDIABKIDS is proportional to patient-years and thus valid for comparison.
- Also stated in: § Analyses of study data · plain
- Findingown data
CSII was overrepresented in mild DKA (85.2% vs 59.7%, p < 0.001).
“CSII was overrepresented in mild DKA (85.2% vs. with CSII, p < 0.001)”
- Also stated in: § Analyses of study data · plain
“Children with mild DKA (pH 7.20–7.29) had a significantly larger distribution of CSII than the national pediatric T1D population (85.2% vs. 59.7%, p < 0.001, chi‐square goodness‐of‐fit test, Figure 3).”
- Also stated in: § CONCLUSIONS · plain
“However, this overrepresentation of CSII was seen in mild DKA.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The DKA cases captured in the study are representative of all DKA cases in Sweden during the study period with respect to insulin delivery mode.
- Rests on an assumption: Treatment mode recorded at admission (CSII or MDI) accurately reflects the patient's insulin delivery mode at the time of DKA.
- Rests on an assumption: The national population distribution of CSII and MDI based on treatment months in SWEDIABKIDS is proportional to patient-years and thus valid for comparison.
- Also stated in: § Analyses of study data · plain
- Findingown data
The distribution of CSII at DKA admission was significantly larger than in the national pediatric population with T1D (74.7% vs 59.7%, p = 0.002).
“The distribution of CSII at DKA admission was significantly larger than in the national pediatric population with T1D (74.7% vs. 59.7%, p = 0.002).”
- Also stated in: § Analyses of study data · plain
“There was a significant difference between the observed and the expected distributions of CSII and MDI in the population of DKA admissions (χ = 9.317, p = 0.002, chi‐square goodness‐of‐fit test, Figure 2).”
- Also stated in: § CONCLUSIONS · plain
“Compared with the distribution of CSII in the national pediatric population with T1D, the distribution of CSII was significantly higher in children admitted to hospital for DKA.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The DKA cases captured in the study are representative of all DKA cases in Sweden during the study period with respect to insulin delivery mode.
- Rests on an assumption: Treatment mode recorded at admission (CSII or MDI) accurately reflects the patient's insulin delivery mode at the time of DKA.
- Rests on an assumption: The national population distribution of CSII and MDI based on treatment months in SWEDIABKIDS is proportional to patient-years and thus valid for comparison.
- Also stated in: § Analyses of study data · plain
- Findingown data
HbA1c levels >70 mmol/mol at admission for DKA were seen in 18/19 (94.7%) of children with MDI and 27/55 (49.1%) of children with CSII.
“HbA1c levels >70 mmol/mol at admission for DKA were seen in 18/19 (94.7%) of children with MDI and 27/55 (49.1%) of children with CSII.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: HbA1c measured at hospital admission for DKA reflects usual glycemic control prior to the DKA episode.
- Findingown data
In univariate regression analyses of pH, access to home ketone meters was significantly associated with a higher mean pH value (p = 0.046, CI -0.152 to -0.001).
“In univariate regression analyses of pH regarding effects of insulin delivery mode (CSII or MDI), sex, age, CGM and access to ketone meters, CSII was significantly associated with a higher mean pH value (p = 0.001, CI −0.110 to −0.029) as was access to home ketone meters (p = 0.046. CI −0.152 to −0.001.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Among children with mild DKA, CSII had significantly lower HbA1c levels than MDI (p = 0.046).
“Children with CSII had significantly lower HbA1c levels than MDI (Table 1, p < 0.001, Mann–Whitney U test), also when subgrouped into mild DKA (p = 0.046) and moderate/severe DKA (p = 0.002).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: HbA1c measured at hospital admission for DKA reflects usual glycemic control prior to the DKA episode.
- Findingown data
Children with mild DKA (pH 7.20-7.29) had a significantly larger distribution of CSII than the national pediatric T1D population (85.2% vs 59.7%, p < 0.001).
“Children with mild DKA (pH 7.20–7.29) had a significantly larger distribution of CSII than the national pediatric T1D population (85.2% vs. 59.7%, p < 0.001, chi‐square goodness‐of‐fit test, Figure 3).”
- Also stated in: § CONCLUSIONS · plain
“However, this overrepresentation of CSII was seen in mild DKA.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The DKA cases captured in the study are representative of all DKA cases in Sweden during the study period with respect to insulin delivery mode.
- Rests on an assumption: Treatment mode recorded at admission (CSII or MDI) accurately reflects the patient's insulin delivery mode at the time of DKA.
- Rests on an assumption: The national population distribution of CSII and MDI based on treatment months in SWEDIABKIDS is proportional to patient-years and thus valid for comparison.
- Also stated in: § CONCLUSIONS · plain
- Findingown data
Among children with moderate/severe DKA, CSII had significantly lower HbA1c levels than MDI (p = 0.002).
“Children with CSII had significantly lower HbA1c levels than MDI (Table 1, p < 0.001, Mann–Whitney U test), also when subgrouped into mild DKA (p = 0.046) and moderate/severe DKA (p = 0.002).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: HbA1c measured at hospital admission for DKA reflects usual glycemic control prior to the DKA episode.
- Findingown data
Median pH at admission for DKA was 7.25 in CSII group and 7.16 in MDI group.
“Median pH at admission for DKA was 7.25 (max 7.29 min 6.96) in the CSII group and 7.16 (max 7.28 min 6.95) in the MDI group.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Among children with reports on access to ketone meter for home use, 52/53 (98.1%) of CSII users and 15/22 (68.2%) of MDI users reported having access to ketone meters at time of admission for DKA.
“Among children with reports on access to ketone meter for home use, 52/53 (98.1%) of the CSII users and 15/22 (68.2%) of the MDI users reported having had access to ketone meters at the time of admission for DKA.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Access to ketone meters and CGM reported in questionnaires is accurate.
- Findingown data
When severe and moderate DKA were combined, moderate/severe DKA had a distribution of CSII similar to the national population (57.9% vs 59.7%, p = 0.82).
“When severe and moderate DKA were combined, moderate/severe DKA had a distribution of CSII similar to the national population (57.9% vs. 59.7%, p = 0.82, chi‐square goodness‐of‐fit test, Figure 3).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The DKA cases captured in the study are representative of all DKA cases in Sweden during the study period with respect to insulin delivery mode.
- Rests on an assumption: Treatment mode recorded at admission (CSII or MDI) accurately reflects the patient's insulin delivery mode at the time of DKA.
- Rests on an assumption: The national population distribution of CSII and MDI based on treatment months in SWEDIABKIDS is proportional to patient-years and thus valid for comparison.
- Findingown data
Children with moderate DKA (pH 7.10-7.19) had a similar distribution of CSII to the national population (62.1% vs 59.7%, p = 0.80).
“Children with moderate DKA (pH 7.10–7.19), had a similar distribution of CSII to the national population (62.1% vs. 59.7%, p = 0.80).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The DKA cases captured in the study are representative of all DKA cases in Sweden during the study period with respect to insulin delivery mode.
- Rests on an assumption: Treatment mode recorded at admission (CSII or MDI) accurately reflects the patient's insulin delivery mode at the time of DKA.
- Rests on an assumption: The national population distribution of CSII and MDI based on treatment months in SWEDIABKIDS is proportional to patient-years and thus valid for comparison.
- Findingown data
In univariate regression analyses of pH, CSII was significantly associated with a higher mean pH value (p = 0.001, CI -0.110 to -0.029).
“In univariate regression analyses of pH regarding effects of insulin delivery mode (CSII or MDI), sex, age, CGM and access to ketone meters, CSII was significantly associated with a higher mean pH value (p = 0.001, CI −0.110 to −0.029) as was access to home ketone meters (p = 0.046. CI −0.152 to −0.001.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
There was a significant difference between observed and expected distributions of CSII and MDI in DKA admissions (χ = 9.317, p = 0.002).
“There was a significant difference between the observed and the expected distributions of CSII and MDI in the population of DKA admissions (χ = 9.317, p = 0.002, chi‐square goodness‐of‐fit test, Figure 2).”
- Also stated in: § DISCUSSION · plain
“The main finding is that DKA was more common in children with CSII compared to the distribution of CSII in the national pediatric population.”
- Also stated in: § CONCLUSIONS · plain
“Compared with the distribution of CSII in the national pediatric population with T1D, the distribution of CSII was significantly higher in children admitted to hospital for DKA.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The DKA cases captured in the study are representative of all DKA cases in Sweden during the study period with respect to insulin delivery mode.
- Rests on an assumption: Treatment mode recorded at admission (CSII or MDI) accurately reflects the patient's insulin delivery mode at the time of DKA.
- Rests on an assumption: The national population distribution of CSII and MDI based on treatment months in SWEDIABKIDS is proportional to patient-years and thus valid for comparison.
- Also stated in: § DISCUSSION · plain
- Findingown data
MDI users with DKA had higher mean HbA1c levels than the national pediatric population with MDI (102.7 vs 59.2 mmol/mol, 11.6% vs 7.6%).
“MDI users with DKA had higher mean HbA1c levels than the national pediatric population with MDI (102.7 vs. 59.2 mmol/mol, 11.6% vs. 7.6%).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: HbA1c measured at hospital admission for DKA reflects usual glycemic control prior to the DKA episode.
- Findingown data
Children with CSII had significantly lower HbA1c levels than MDI at admission for DKA (p < 0.001).
“Children with CSII had significantly lower HbA1c levels than MDI (Table 1, p < 0.001, Mann–Whitney U test), also when subgrouped into mild DKA (p = 0.046) and moderate/severe DKA (p = 0.002).”
- Also stated in: § CONCLUSIONS · plain
“Children treated with MDI who developed DKA had significantly higher HbA1c levels at hospital admission”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: HbA1c measured at hospital admission for DKA reflects usual glycemic control prior to the DKA episode.
- Also stated in: § CONCLUSIONS · plain
- Findingown data
CSII users with DKA also had higher HbA1c levels than the national pediatric population with CSII, but to a lesser degree (73.9 vs 58.8 mmol/mol, 8.9% vs 7.5%).
“CSII users with DKA also had higher HbA1c levels than the national pediatric population with CSII, but to a lesser degree (73.9 vs. 58.8 mmol/mol, 8.9% vs. 7.5%).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: HbA1c measured at hospital admission for DKA reflects usual glycemic control prior to the DKA episode.
- Findingown data
Mann-Whitney U test showed a significant difference in pH distributions between CSII and MDI (p < 0.001).
“The Mann–Whitney U test showed a significant difference in pH distributions between CSII and MDI (p < 0.001).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
There were only nine children with severe DKA (pH <7.10), of which five had MDI and four CSII.
“There were only nine children with severe DKA (pH <7.10), of which five had MDI and four CSII.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data
CSII was associated with higher risk of mild DKA than MDI.
“CSII was associated with higher risk of mild DKA than MDI.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The DKA cases captured in the study are representative of all DKA cases in Sweden during the study period with respect to insulin delivery mode.
- Rests on an assumption: Treatment mode recorded at admission (CSII or MDI) accurately reflects the patient's insulin delivery mode at the time of DKA.
- Rests on an assumption: The national population distribution of CSII and MDI based on treatment months in SWEDIABKIDS is proportional to patient-years and thus valid for comparison.
- Interpretationown data
MDI was associated with markedly higher HbA1c levels than CSII at hospital admission for DKA.
“MDI was associated with markedly higher HbA1c levels than CSII at hospital admission for DKA.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: HbA1c measured at hospital admission for DKA reflects usual glycemic control prior to the DKA episode.
- Interpretationown data
The results suggest that DKA could still be a more significant problem in children with CSII compared with MDI.
“The results suggest that DKA could still be a more significant problem in children with CSII compared with MDI.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The DKA cases captured in the study are representative of all DKA cases in Sweden during the study period with respect to insulin delivery mode.
- Rests on an assumption: Treatment mode recorded at admission (CSII or MDI) accurately reflects the patient's insulin delivery mode at the time of DKA.
- Rests on an assumption: The national population distribution of CSII and MDI based on treatment months in SWEDIABKIDS is proportional to patient-years and thus valid for comparison.
- Interpretationown data
The results in this study indicate that children with MDI and DKA, largely, might belong to a group with high HbA1c levels.
“The results in this study indicate that children with MDI and DKA, largely, might belong to a group with high HbA1c levels.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: HbA1c measured at hospital admission for DKA reflects usual glycemic control prior to the DKA episode.
- Interpretationreasoning
Access to ketone meters may have guided the CSII users to seek medical help earlier, thus preventing the progress to more severe DKA.
“Access to ketone meters may have guided the CSII users to seek medical help earlier, thus preventing the progress to more severe DKA.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Access to ketone meters and CGM reported in questionnaires is accurate.
- Interpretationown data
In contrast, the HbA1c levels among children with CSII and DKA are more in line with the HbA1c levels in the national population with T1D.
“In contrast, the HbA1c levels among children with CSII and DKA are more in line with the HbA1c levels in the national population with T1D.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: HbA1c measured at hospital admission for DKA reflects usual glycemic control prior to the DKA episode.
- Interpretationown data
The pH differences between CSII and MDI among admissions for DKA can be explained by the fact that CSII was overrepresented in mild DKA, and not because children with MDI and DKA had more severe DKA.
“The pH differences between CSII and MDI among admissions for DKA can thus be explained by the fact that CSII was overrepresented in mild DKA, and not because children with MDI and DKA had more severe DKA.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The children with DKA did not utilize publicly available technology (CGM is reimbursed in Sweden) at the time of hospital admission.
“Thus, the children with DKA did not utilize publicly available technology (CGM is reimbursed in Sweden) at the time of hospital admission.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Access to ketone meters and CGM reported in questionnaires is accurate.
- Study design and conductown data
The study captured 99/118 (84%) of all patients with DKA compared to SWEDIABKIDS when including only first hospital admission for children with multiple DKA events.
“When including only the first hospital admission for DKA in children with multiple DKA events, the study captured 99/118 (84%) of all patients with DKA compared to Swediabkids.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The DKA cases captured in the study are representative of all DKA cases in Sweden during the study period with respect to insulin delivery mode.
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 26
- May combine two claims. 13
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationBetter glycemic control has been shown in several studies with CGM.
“Besides advantages in increasing comfort, for example by enabling uninterrupted physical activity and minimizing the need for capillary glucose tests, better glycemic control has been shown in several studies. 7 , 13 , 19 , 20 , 21”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 3 sources checked- cites [7] Cardona‐Hernandez R, Schwandt A, Alkandari H, et al. Glycemic outcome associated with insulin pump and glucose sensor use in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes. Data from the International Pediatric Registry SWEET. Diabetes Care. 2021; 44(5): 1176‐ 1184. 33653821 source
- cites [13] Bratke H, Margeirsdottir HD, Assmus J, Njolstad PR, Skrivarhaug T. Does current diabetes technology improve metabolic control? A cross‐sectional study on the use of insulin pumps and continuous glucose monitoring devices in a Nationwide pediatric population. Diabetes Ther. 2021; 12(9): 2571‐ 2583. 34389930 PMC8385028 source
- cites [19] DeSalvo DJ, Miller KM, Hermann JM, et al. Continuous glucose monitoring and glycemic control among youth with type 1 diabetes: international comparison from the T1D exchange and DPV initiative. Pediatr Diabetes. 2018; 19(7): 1271‐ 1275. 29923262 PMC6175652 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationDKA is associated with significant risk of acute morbidity and mortality, may cause long-term morbidity, and entails a substantial healthcare cost.
“Since DKA is associated with significant risk of acute morbidity and mortality, may cause long‐term morbidity, and entails a substantial healthcare cost, it is nonetheless imperative to keep the incidence rate of DKA as low as possible. 27 , 28 , 29”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 3 sources checked- cites [27] Aye T, Mazaika PK, Mauras N, et al. Impact of early diabetic ketoacidosis on the developing brain. Diabetes Care. 2019; 42(3): 443‐ 449. 30573652 PMC6385695 source
The Introduction describes DKA as a leading acute cause of morbidity and mortality in youth with type 1 diabetes and associates it with long-term adverse cognitive effects. The Conclusions also say that a single moderate or severe episode in young children can potentially have long-term effects. The paper does not substantiate the claim about substantial healthcare cost (searched: healthcare costs, hospitalization, economic cost, cost). (LLM, conf=0.90)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [28] Ghetti S, Kuppermann N, Rewers A, et al. Cognitive function following diabetic ketoacidosis in children with new‐onset or previously diagnosed type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2020; 43(11): 2768‐ 2775. 32962981 PMC7576431 source
The Conclusions (page not provided) describe brain injury as a serious DKA complication and report cognitive deficits that may persist or worsen, supporting the morbidity portions of the claim, particularly in children with type 1 diabetes. Our copy does not establish the claimed mortality risk or substantial healthcare cost. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [29] Donzeau A, Piffaretti C, Jossens A, et al. Time trend in excess mortality in children with type 1 diabetes from 1987 to 2016 in mainland France. Pediatr Diabetes. 2021; 23: 38‐ 44. 34881493 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThis study should be interpreted in relation to international rates of DKA in children with T1D, which are higher than in Sweden.
“This study should be interpreted in relation to international rates of DKA in children with T1D, which are higher than in Sweden. 34 , 35”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites [34] Cengiz E, Xing D, Wong JC, et al. Severe hypoglycemia and diabetic ketoacidosis among youth with type 1 diabetes in the T1D exchange clinic registry. Pediatr Diabetes. 2013; 14(6): 447‐ 454. 23469984 PMC4100244 source
The Results > DKA section reports that 9.9% of participants in a US registry had at least one DKA event within 12 months. The Discussion places that figure alongside rates from other studies but says those rates are difficult to compare; it gives no Swedish rate or comparison showing that international rates are higher than Sweden’s. (LLM, conf=0.81)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [35] Maahs DM, Hermann JM, Holman N, et al. Rates of diabetic ketoacidosis: international comparison with 49,859 pediatric patients with type 1 diabetes from England, Wales, the U.S., Austria, and Germany. Diabetes Care. 2015; 38(10): 1876‐ 1882. 26283737 source
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataMean HbA1c at hospital admission was 73.9 mmol/mol with CSII and 102.7 mmol/mol with MDI.
“Mean HbA1c at hospital admission was 73.9 mmol/mol with CSII and 102.7 mmol/mol with MDI.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: HbA1c measured at hospital admission for DKA reflects usual glycemic control prior to the DKA episode.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataThere were 118 DKA cases calculated from SWEDIABKIDS during the study period.
“Including only the first DKA event in patients with multiple events, there were 118 DKA cases calculated from Swediabkids during the study period February 1, 2015 to January 31, 2017.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn adjusted multivariable regression analyses, only insulin treatment mode had a significant effect on pH, with CSII being associated with a higher mean pH value than MDI (p = 0.028, CI -0.103 to -0.006).
“In adjusted multivariable regression analyses, only insulin treatment mode had a significant effect on pH, with CSII being associated with a higher mean pH value than MDI (p = 0.028, CI −0.103 to −0.006).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn SWEDIABKIDS, among 7832 children with treatment mode registered, treatment time was 84,130 months (59.7%) with CSII and 56,755 months (40.3%) with MDI during the study period.
“Treatment mode (CSII or MDI) was registered during at least one routine visit in 7832 children, in whom the treatment time was 84,130 months (59.7%) with CSII and 56,755 months (40.3%) with MDI (Figure 1).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The national population distribution of CSII and MDI based on treatment months in SWEDIABKIDS is proportional to patient-years and thus valid for comparison.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataRegarding CGM, 39/70 (55.7%) of CSII users and 7/25 (28.0%) of MDI users had CGM at admission.
“Regarding CGM, 39/70 (55.7%) of the CSII users and 7/25 (28.0%) of the MDI users had CGM at admission.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Access to ketone meters and CGM reported in questionnaires is accurate.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataCGM use in children with DKA was only 58% for CSII and 29% for MDI, compared to an overall figure of 80%-90% in SWEDIABKIDS during the study period.
“CGM use in children with DKA was only 58% for CSII and 29% for MDI, compared to an overall figure of 80%–90% in SWEDIABKIDS during the study period.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Access to ketone meters and CGM reported in questionnaires is accurate.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataOf the 99 DKA cases included, 74/99 (74.7%) were CSII and 25/99 (25.3%) were MDI.
“Of these, there were 74/99 (74.7%) cases with CSII and 25/99 (25.3%) cases with MDI treatment (Table 1 and Figure 1).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Treatment mode recorded at admission (CSII or MDI) accurately reflects the patient's insulin delivery mode at the time of DKA.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataNo significant interactions were found between the independent variables.
“No significant interactions were found between the independent variables.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationStudies have shown mixed results regarding DKA incidence rates when comparing CSII with MDI, with CSII associated with higher, lower, or practically equal DKA incidence rates compared with MDI in various populations.
“However, studies have shown mixed results regarding DKA incidence rates when comparing CSII with MDI. CSII has been associated with higher, 10 , 11 lower, 7 , 8 or practically equal 12 , 13 DKA incidence rates compared with MDI in various populations.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [10] Brorsson AL, Viklund G, Ortqvist E, Lindholm OA. Does treatment with an insulin pump improve glycaemic control in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes? A retrospective case‐control study. Pediatr Diabetes. 2015; 16(7): 546‐ 553. 25327782 source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
- cites [11] Hanas R, Lindgren F, Lindblad B. A 2‐yr national population study of pediatric ketoacidosis in Sweden: predisposing conditions and insulin pump use. Pediatr Diabetes. 2009; 10(1): 33‐ 37. 18761647 source
- cites [7] Cardona‐Hernandez R, Schwandt A, Alkandari H, et al. Glycemic outcome associated with insulin pump and glucose sensor use in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes. Data from the International Pediatric Registry SWEET. Diabetes Care. 2021; 44(5): 1176‐ 1184. 33653821 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationAccess to blood ketone tests at home is recommended by many authors since these tests may reduce hospitalizations for DKA.
“In addition, access to blood ketone tests at home is recommended by many authors since these tests may reduce hospitalizations for DKA. 14 , 15 , 16”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [14] Vanelli M, Mastrorilli C, Fainardi V, et al. Clinical utility of beta‐hydroxybutyrate measurement in the management of physiological ketosis at home in children under 5. Acta Bio‐Med: Atenei Parmensis. 2019; 90(2): 215‐ 220. PMC6776208 31124998 source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
- cites [15] Laffel LM, Wentzell K, Loughlin C, Tovar A, Moltz K, Brink S. Sick day management using blood 3‐hydroxybutyrate (3‐OHB) compared with urine ketone monitoring reduces hospital visits in young people with T1DM: a randomized clinical trial. Diabetic Med. 2006; 23(3): 278‐ 284. 16492211 source
- cites [16] Klocker AA, Phelan H, Twigg SM, Craig ME. Blood beta‐hydroxybutyrate vs. urine acetoacetate testing for the prevention and management of ketoacidosis in type 1 diabetes: a systematic review. Diabetic Med. 2013; 30(7): 818‐ 824. 23330615 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown datapH values at hospital admission were compared between CSII and MDI using Mann-Whitney U test and univariate and multivariable regression analyses, adjusting for sex, age, and access to ketone meters and CGM, with robust estimation of variance.
“pH values at hospital admission were compared between CSII and MDI using the Mann–Whitney U test and univariate and multivariable regression analyses, adjusting for sex, age, and access to ketone meters and CGM, with robust estimation of the variance for the multivariable analysis. 31”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [31] Dudgeon P. Some improvements in confidence intervals for standardized regression coefficients. Psychometrika. 2017; 82(4): 928‐ 951. 28290108
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationDKA incidence rates in children with established T1D are relatively low in Sweden from an international perspective, with annual incidences of hospital admission for DKA below 1% in the total national T1D pediatric population.
“DKA incidence rates in children with established T1D are relatively low in Sweden from an international perspective, with annual incidences of hospital admission for DKA below 1% in the total national T1D pediatric population. 4”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [4] Annual Report of the Swedish National Paediatric Diabetes Registry (SWEDIABKIDS). 2020; Accessed February 2022. https://www.ndr.nu/pdfs/Arsrapport_Swediabkids_2020.pdf.
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenAll pediatric centers caring for children with diabetes agreed to participate prior to the inclusion period.
“All pediatric centers caring for children with diabetes agreed to participate prior to the inclusion period.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationCGM utilizes subcutaneous sensors for continuous monitoring of glucose levels with a high degree of accuracy.
“CGM utilizes subcutaneous sensors for continuous monitoring of glucose levels with a high degree of accuracy. 17 , 18”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [17] Bailey TS, Chang A, Christiansen M. Clinical accuracy of a continuous glucose monitoring system with an advanced algorithm. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2015; 9(2): 209‐ 214. 25370149 PMC4604574 source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
- cites [18] Laffel L. Improved accuracy of continuous glucose monitoring systems in pediatric patients with diabetes mellitus: results from two studies. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2016; 18(Suppl 2): S223. 26784126 PMC4717517
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenThere were no exclusion criteria.
“There were no exclusion criteria.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductown dataThe study is part of a two-year national prospective study, including all children 0-17.99 years with both new-onset and established T1D admitted to hospital for DKA in Sweden from February 1, 2015 to January 31, 2017.
“This study is part of a two‐year national prospective study, including all children 0–17.99 years with both new‐onset and established T1D admitted to hospital for DKA in Sweden from February 1, 2015 to January 31, 2017.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
PremisereasoningInterruption of insulin administration via CSII results in quicker ketogenesis than missed doses with MDI, where a long-acting insulin provides an insulin depot.
“Interruption of insulin administration via CSII results in quicker ketogenesis than missed doses with MDI, where a long‐acting insulin provides an insulin depot.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenApproval for this study was granted from the regional research ethics committee in Vastra Gotaland, Gothenburg, Sweden (registration number 748-14), who granted permission for the conduction of the study nationally.
“Approval for this study was granted from the regional research ethics committee in Vastra Gotaland, Gothenburg, Sweden (registration number 748‐14), who granted permission for the conduction of the study nationally.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationCGM has been associated with lower frequencies of DKA in several international studies.
“CGM has been associated with lower frequencies of DKA in several international studies. 7”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [7] Cardona‐Hernandez R, Schwandt A, Alkandari H, et al. Glycemic outcome associated with insulin pump and glucose sensor use in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes. Data from the International Pediatric Registry SWEET. Diabetes Care. 2021; 44(5): 1176‐ 1184. 33653821 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductreasoningAnother limitation is the lack of socioeconomic or ethnic data in statistical analyses.
“Another limitation is the lack of socioeconomic or ethnic data in statistical analyses.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductnone givenA strength with this study is that it is a national population-based design that included all children 0-17.99 years with T1D admitted to hospital for DKA during 2 years.
“A strength with this study is that it is a national population‐based design that included all children 0–17.99 years with T1D admitted to hospital for DKA during 2 years.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenAll included individuals consented to take part in the study, either by their caregivers or by caregivers and the child if above the age of 15 years.
“All included individuals consented to take part in the study, either by their caregivers or by caregivers and the child if above the age of 15 years.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationcitationThe significant overrepresentation of CSII among hospital admissions for mild DKA could reflect a management problem in this group.
“The significant overrepresentation of CSII among hospital admissions for mild DKA could reflect a management problem in this group. 36”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [36] Dogan ADA, Jorgensen UL, Gjessing HJ. Diabetic ketoacidosis among patients treated with continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2017; 11(3): 631‐ 632. 27595713 PMC5505411
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductnone givenIf a child had experienced multiple episodes of DKA during the study period, only the first episode was included in the study.
“If a child had experienced multiple episodes of DKA during the study period, only the first episode was included in the study.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenA lower DKA incidence in Sweden might reflect increased awareness among patients and caregivers.
“A lower DKA incidence in Sweden might reflect increased awareness among patients and caregivers.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataA limitation in this study is that the total treatment time since the start of CSII treatment until DKA admission was impossible to obtain from SWEDIABKIDS.
“A limitation in this study is that the total treatment time since the start of CSII treatment until DKA admission was impossible to obtain from SWEDIABKIDS.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductnone givenA high-quality national register (SWEDIABKIDS) was used to compare the background pediatric population with T1D.
“Furthermore, a high‐quality national register (SWEDIABKIDS) was used to compare the background pediatric population with T1D.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
The paper relies on this without support.
The DKA cases captured in the study are representative of all DKA cases in Sweden during the study period with respect to insulin delivery mode.
“When including only the first hospital admission for DKA in children with multiple DKA events, the study captured 99/118 (84%) of all patients with DKA compared to Swediabkids.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Treatment mode recorded at admission (CSII or MDI) accurately reflects the patient's insulin delivery mode at the time of DKA.
“Parents/caregivers, together with their children if 15 years of age or above, filled out a questionnaire regarding demographic data, insulin treatment mode (CSII or MDI), access to capillary ketone meters, and CGM use at the time of admission.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The national population distribution of CSII and MDI based on treatment months in SWEDIABKIDS is proportional to patient-years and thus valid for comparison.
“Data on patient‐years with CSII or MDI were derived from the current type of insulin treatment registered in SWEDIABKIDS during routine outpatient visits.”
The paper relies on this without support.
HbA1c measured at hospital admission for DKA reflects usual glycemic control prior to the DKA episode.
“HbA1c levels were compared between CSII and MDI in DKA using the Mann–Whitney U test.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Access to ketone meters and CGM reported in questionnaires is accurate.
“Parents/caregivers, together with their children if 15 years of age or above, filled out a questionnaire regarding demographic data, insulin treatment mode (CSII or MDI), access to capillary ketone meters, and CGM use at the time of admission.”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Abstract gives a different pH range for moderate DKA
MinorThe abstract defines moderate DKA as pH 7.10-7.29, which overlaps its mild category. The methods define moderate DKA as pH 7.10-7.19.
“mild (pH 7.20–7.29), moderate (pH 7.10–7.29) and severe DKA (pH <7.10)”
“mild DKA (pH 7.20–7.29), moderate DKA (pH 7.10–7.19), and severe DKA (pH <7.10)”
Discussion CGM percentages differ from reported study results
MinorThe discussion states CGM use among children with DKA was 58% for CSII and 29% for MDI, whereas the results give 39/70 (55.7%) and 7/25 (28.0%), respectively. Neither discussion percentage is the rounded value of its reported result.
“CGM use in children with DKA was only 58% for CSII and 29% for MDI”
“Regarding CGM, 39/70 (55.7%) of the CSII users and 7/25 (28.0%) of the MDI users had CGM at admission.”
Mild-DKA MDI HbA1c standard deviation is incompatible with its range
MinorFor mild DKA with MDI, the reported HbA1c% SD is 3.0, although every reported value lies between 9.0% and 11.1%. Even a two-observation sample spanning that entire range could have an SD of at most about 1.49%.
“| HbA1c% | Mean (SD) | MDI | 11.6 (4.3) | 10.2 (3.0) | 12.1 (4.4) |”
“| HbA1c% | Median (min–max) | MDI | 11.3 (7.9–14.9) | 10.5 (9.0–11.1) | 12.4 (7.9–14.9) |”
Overall MDI minimum pH excludes a subgroup value
MinorThe table gives 6.96 as the minimum pH for all MDI cases, but 6.95 as the minimum for the moderate/severe MDI subgroup.
“| pH | Median (min–max) | MDI | 7.16 (6.96–7.28) | 7.23 (7.20–7.28) | 7.13 (6.95–7.19) |”
“Median pH at admission for DKA was 7.25 (max 7.29 min 6.96) in the CSII group and 7.16 (max 7.28 min 6.95) in the MDI group.”
Cites
Effectiveness of Sensor-Augmented Insulin-Pump Therapy in Type 1 Diabetes
Bergenstal, R. M., Tamborlane, W. V., Ahmann, A., Buse, J. B., Dailey, G., Davis, S. N., Joyce, C., Peoples, T., Perkins, B. A., Welsh, J. B., et al. (2010) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1002853 · Cited by 894 · see citing works
Wolfsdorf, J. I., Glaser, N. S., Agus, M. S. D., Fritsch, M., Hanås, R., Rewers, A., Sperling, M. A., & Ethel Codner, D. (2018) · Pediatric Diabetes · doi:10.1111/pedi.12701 · Cited by 724 · see citing works
A Randomized Trial of Closed-Loop Control in Children with Type 1 Diabetes
Breton, M. D., Kanapka, L. G., Beck, R. W., Ekhlaspour, L., Forlenza, G. P., Cengiz, E., Schoelwer, M., Ruedy, K. J., Jost, E., Carria, L., et al. (2020) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa2004736 · Cited by 455 · see citing works
Karges, B., Schwandt, A., Heidtmann, B., Kordonouri, O., Binder, E., Schierloh, U., Boettcher, C., Kapellen, T., Rosenbauer, J., & Holl, R. W. (2017) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2017.13994 · Cited by 452 · see citing works
Tauschmann, M., Thabit, H., Bally, L., Allen, J. M., Hartnell, S., Wilinska, M. E., Ruan, Y., Sibayan, J., Kollman, C., Cheng, P., et al. (2018) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(18)31947-0 · Cited by 440 · see citing works
Cengiz, E., Xing, D., Wong, J. C., Wolfsdorf, J. I., Haymond, M. W., Rewers, A., Shanmugham, S., Tamborlane, W. V., Willi, S. M., Seiple, D. L., et al. (2013) · Pediatric Diabetes · doi:10.1111/pedi.12030 · Cited by 243 · see citing works
Nimri, R., Battelino, T., Laffel, L. M., Slover, R. H., Schatz, D., Weinzimer, S. A., Dovc, K., Danne, T., Phillip, M., NextDREAM Consortium, et al. (2020) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-020-1045-7 · Cited by 242 · see citing works
Danne, T., Phillip, M., Buckingham, B. A., Jarosz-Chobot, P. A., Saboo, B., Urakami, T., Battelino, T., Hanås, R., & Ethel Codner, D. (2018) · Pediatric Diabetes · doi:10.1111/pedi.12718 · Cited by 226 · see citing works
Maahs, D. M., Hermann, J. M., Holman, N., Foster, N. C., Kapellen, T. M., Allgrove, J., Schatz, D. A., Hofer, S. E., Campbell, F., Steigleder-Schweiger, C., et al. (2015) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc15-0780 · Cited by 224 · see citing works
DeSalvo, D. J., Miller, K. M., Hermann, J. M., Maahs, D. M., Hofer, S. E., Clements, M. A., Lilienthal, E., Sherr, J. L., Tauschmann, M., Holl, R. W., et al. (2018) · Pediatric Diabetes · doi:10.1111/pedi.12711 · Cited by 212 · see citing works
ISPAD Clinical Practice Consensus Guidelines 2018: diabetes technologies
Sherr, J. L., Tauschmann, M., Battelino, T., de Bock, M., Forlenza, G., Roman, R., Hood, K. K., & Maahs, D. M. (2018) · Pediatric Diabetes · doi:10.1111/pedi.12731 · Cited by 197 · see citing works
Clinical accuracy of a continuous glucose monitoring system with an advanced algorithm
Bailey, T. S., Chang, A., & Christiansen, M. (2015) · Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology · doi:10.1177/1932296814559746 · Cited by 168 · see citing works
Laffel, L. M. B., Wentzell, K., Loughlin, C., Tovar, A., Moltz, K., & Brink, S. (2006) · Diabetic Medicine · doi:10.1111/j.1464-5491.2005.01771.x · Cited by 164 · see citing works
Cardona-Hernandez, R., Schwandt, A., Alkandari, H., Bratke, H., Chobot, A., Coles, N., Corathers, S., Goksen, D., Goss, P., Imane, Z., et al. (2021) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc20-1674 · Cited by 129 · see citing works
Insulin pump therapy in children with type 1 diabetes: analysis of data from the SWEET registry
Szypowska, A., Schwandt, A., Svensson, J., Shalitin, S., Cardona‐Hernandez, R., Forsander, G., Sundberg, F., de Beaufort, C. E., Maahs, D. M., Maffeis, C., et al. (2016) · Pediatric Diabetes · doi:10.1111/pedi.12416 · Cited by 126 · see citing works
Self-citationImpact of Early Diabetic Ketoacidosis on the Developing Brain
Aye, T., Mazaika, P. K., Mauras, N., Marzelli, M. J., Shen, H., Hershey, T., Cato, A., Weinzimer, S. A., White, N. H., Tsalikian, E., et al. (2019) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc18-1405 · Cited by 124 · see citing works
Hanas, R., Lindgren, F., & Lindblad, B. (2009) · Pediatric Diabetes · doi:10.1111/j.1399-5448.2008.00441.x · Cited by 93 · see citing works
Managing diabetes in preschool children
Sundberg, F., Barnard, K., Cato, A., de Beaufort, C., DiMeglio, L. A., Dooley, G., Hershey, T., Hitchcock, J., Jain, V., Weissberg-Benchell, J., et al. (2017) · Pediatric Diabetes · doi:10.1111/pedi.12554 · Cited by 91 · see citing works
Ghetti, S., Kuppermann, N., Rewers, A., Myers, S. R., Schunk, J. E., Stoner, M. J., Garro, A., Quayle, K. S., Brown, K. M., Trainor, J. L., et al. (2020) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc20-0187 · Cited by 91 · see citing works
Laffel, L. M. (2016) · Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1089/dia.2015.0380 · Cited by 86 · see citing works
Klocker, A. A., Phelan, H., Twigg, S. M., & Craig, M. E. (2013) · Diabetic Medicine · doi:10.1111/dme.12136 · Cited by 84 · see citing works
Continuous glucose monitoring in patients with type 1 diabetes using insulin injections
Foster, N. C., Miller, K. M., Tamborlane, W. V., Bergenstal, R. M., & Beck, R. W. (2016) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc16-0207 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
Brorsson, A. L., Viklund, G., Örtqvist, E., & Lindholm Olinder, A. (2015) · Pediatric Diabetes · doi:10.1111/pedi.12209 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Type 1 diabetes mellitus management in young children: implementation of current technologies
Nevo-Shenker, M., Phillip, M., Nimri, R., & Shalitin, S. (2019) · Pediatric Research · doi:10.1038/s41390-019-0665-4 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Blair, J., McKay, A., Ridyard, C. H., Thornborough, K., Bedson, E., Peak, M., Didi, M., Annan, F., Gregory, J. W., Hughes, D. A., et al. (2018) · Health Technology Assessment · doi:10.3310/hta22420 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Wersäll, J. H., Adolfsson, P., Forsander, G., Ricksten, S., & Hanås, R. (2021) · Pediatric Diabetes · doi:10.1111/pedi.13229 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Self-citationLee, M. H., Paldus, B., Krishnamurthy, B., McAuley, S. A., Shah, R., Jenkins, A. J., & O’Neal, D. N. (2019) · Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology · doi:10.1177/1932296818822986 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Diabetic Ketoacidosis Among Patients Treated With Continuous Subcutaneous Insulin Infusion
Dogan, A. D. A., Jørgensen, U. L., & Gjessing, H. J. (2017) · Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology · doi:10.1177/1932296816668375 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Some Improvements in Confidence Intervals for Standardized Regression Coefficients
Dudgeon, P. (2017) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/s11336-017-9563-z · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Bratke, H., Margeirsdottir, H. D., Assmus, J., Njølstad, P. R., & Skrivarhaug, T. (2021) · Diabetes Therapy · doi:10.1007/s13300-021-01127-6 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Time trend in excess mortality in children with type 1 diabetes from 1987 to 2016 in mainland France
Donzeau, A., Piffaretti, C., Jossens, A., Levaillant, L., Bouhours‐Nouet, N., Amsellem‐Jager, J., Ghosn, W., Rey, G., Fosse‐Edorh, S., & Coutant, R. (2022) · Pediatric Diabetes · doi:10.1111/pedi.13298 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Alemzadeh, R., Parton, E. A., & Holzum, M. K. (2009) · Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1089/dia.2008.0124 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Fureman, A., Lilja, M., Lind, T., Särnblad, S., Bladh, M. K., & Samuelsson, U. (2021) · Pediatric Diabetes · doi:10.1111/pedi.13217 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Hyperglycemic crises in adults with diabetes: a consensus report
Umpierrez, G. E., Davis, G. M., ElSayed, N. A., Fadini, G. P., Galindo, R. J., Hirsch, I. B., Klonoff, D. C., McCoy, R. G., Misra, S., Gabbay, R. A., et al. (2024) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dci24-0032 · Cited by 278 · see citing works
Hyperglycaemic crises in adults with diabetes: a consensus report
Umpierrez, G. E., Davis, G. M., ElSayed, N. A., Fadini, G. P., Galindo, R. J., Hirsch, I. B., Klonoff, D. C., McCoy, R. G., Misra, S., Gabbay, R. A., et al. (2024) · Diabetologia · doi:10.1007/s00125-024-06183-8 · Cited by 172 · see citing works
Diabetic Ketoacidosis in Children and Adolescents; Diagnostic and Therapeutic Pitfalls
Kostopoulou, E., Sinopidis, X., Fouzas, S., Gkentzi, D., Dassios, T. G., Roupakias, S., & Dimitriou, G. (2023) · Diagnostics · doi:10.3390/diagnostics13152602 · Cited by 74 · see citing works
Automated Insulin Delivery for Young People with Type 1 Diabetes and Elevated A1c
Boucsein, A., Zhou, Y., Michaels, V. R., Haszard, J. J., Jefferies, C., Wiltshire, E. J., Paul, R. G., Parry‐Strong, A., Pasha, M., Petrovski, G., et al. (2024) · NEJM Evidence · doi:10.1056/evidoa2400185 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Conway, B. N., Snell‐Bergeon, J. K., Honda-Kohmo, K., Peddi, A. K., Isa, S. B., Sulong, S., Sibomana, L., Gonzalez, A. G., Song, J., Lomax, K., et al. (2024) · Journal of the Endocrine Society · doi:10.1210/jendso/bvae210 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
The Future of Automated Insulin Delivery Systems
Hughes, M. S., & Levy, C. J. (2025) · Endocrine Practice · doi:10.1016/j.eprac.2025.05.752 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Marks, B. E., Meighan, S. S., Fivekiller, E. E., Escobar, E., & Berget, C. (2024) · Hormone Research in Paediatrics · doi:10.1159/000541430 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Breath Acetone Correlates With Capillary β-hydroxybutyrate in Type 1 Diabetes
Jones, K. E., Petersen, M. C., Markov, A. M., Salam, M., Krutilova, P., McKee, A. M., Bohnert, K. L., Adamson, S. E., & McGill, J. B. (2025) · Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology · doi:10.1177/19322968251334640 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Economic Impact of Diabetic Ketoacidosis in the United States
Panjwani, Q., & Bindal, A. (2025) · Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1177/15209156251390832 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Barash, G., Lerman, L., Ben‐Ari, T., Abiri, S., Landau, Z., Ami, M. B., Brener, A., Lebenthal, Y., Pinhas‐Hamiel, O., Mazor‐Aronovitch, K., et al. (2024) · Acta Diabetologica · doi:10.1007/s00592-024-02264-7 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Initiating Insulin Pumps in Youth with New-onset Type 1 Diabetes: A Quality Improvement Initiative
Vakharia, M., Lyons, S. K., BUCKINGHAM, D. A., Rittenhouse, M., McKay, S. V., Sonabend, R., & KIM, G. K. (2025) · Pediatric Quality and Safety · doi:10.1097/pq9.0000000000000803 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Martinez, E. C., Saji, S. Z., Sánchez, M., Nieto, M., Hammoud, A., Valdez, E. D. L. R., Silva, G. B., Arruarana, V. S., Molina, A. N., Cruz, C. S., et al. (2025) · AACE Endocrinology and Diabetes · doi:10.1016/j.aed.2025.12.012 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Beyond the insulin pump: Unraveling diabetes tech dependency
Feliziani, E., Chios, M. C., & Pozzilli, P. (2024) · Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice · doi:10.1016/j.diabres.2024.111896 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Zhen, X. M., Purcell, A. R., Glastras, S. J., Twigg, S., & Wong, J. (2026) · Nutrition Metabolism and Cardiovascular Diseases · doi:10.1016/j.numecd.2026.104641 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Mulhern, E. C., Lamb, F., Whyte, K., Kuehne, V., Craigie, I., & Shaikh, M. G. (2025) · Journal of Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetes · doi:10.25259/jped_3_2025 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Automated Insulin Delivery for People With Type 1 Diabetes and High HbA1c: Is It Time?
Wheeler, B. J., & Boucsein, A. (2024) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dci24-0076 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Insulin pump accuracy at low and minimum delivery rates, in relation to paediatric diabetes care
Payne, M., Pooke, F., Holder-Pearson, L. R., & Chase, G. J. (2023) · IFAC-PapersOnLine · doi:10.1016/j.ifacol.2023.10.132
Deeb, A., Alsaffar, H., Yaqoob, N., & Scaramuzza, A. E. (2026) · Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice · doi:10.1016/j.diabres.2026.113117
Liu, R., & Pan, T. (2026) · BMC Endocrine Disorders · doi:10.1186/s12902-026-02419-3
Riveline, J., Potier, L., Levrat‐Guillen, F., Chesters, C., Bagel, A., Joubert, M., Fagherazzi, G., & Cosson, E. (2026) · Diabetes Obesity and Metabolism · doi:10.1111/dom.71383
Li, W., Zhang, H., Li, Q., & Kong, D. (2026) · European Journal of Pediatrics · doi:10.1007/s00431-026-07435-y
Ghabban, A., Ghabban, S., Alanazi, N., & Almarzooq, A. (2026) · Journal of Healthcare Sciences · doi:10.52533/johs.2026.60913
- Authors
- Wersäll, J. H., Adolfsson, P., Forsander, G., & Hanas, R.
- Affiliations
- Sahlgrenska University Hospital (SE)
- Hallands sjukhus Kungsbacka (SE)
- Institute of Clinical Sciences Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg Gothenburg Sweden
- Corresponding author
- Wersäll, Johan H.
- Venue
- Pediatric Diabetes
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2022-06-17
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1038-1044
- ISSN
- 1399-543X (ISSN-L)
- 1399-5448
- PMC
- PMC9796597
- OpenAlex
- W4281730061
- Cited by
- 21
- References
- 34
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 2
- FWCI
- 2.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Pediatric Diabetes (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Diabetes and associated disorders
- Keywords
- insulin pump therapy, multiple daily insulin injections, diabetic ketoacidosis, type 1 diabetes, children and adolescents, HbA1c, continuous glucose monitoring, DKA severity, insulin delivery method
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Child, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Glycated Hemoglobin, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Injections, Subcutaneous, Insulin, Insulin Infusion Systems, Ketones, Sweden, Diabetic Ketoacidosis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-11-06.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-11-06.
Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review