Cited by 15Job Satisfaction and Organizational BehaviorHuman Resource Development and Performance EvaluationTeam Dynamics and Performance

A reinforcement sensitivity theory view of seeking behaviors at work: A meta‐analysis

Sherf, Elad N., Gilliam, Natalie, McElroy, Terence·2024·Personnel Psychology

Abstract

Scholarship on seeking behaviors, which refer to deliberate attempts to obtain information or assistance from others, has emerged in multiple silos (e.g., feedback‐seeking, information‐seeking, help‐seeking, and advice‐seeking). Furthering recent synthesis attempts, we draw on reinforcement sensitivity theory (RST) to generate novel predictions concerning the causes of explicit and implicit seeking behaviors and clarify the inconsistencies between theoretical predictions and empirical findings noted in past reviews. We test our arguments through a meta‐analysis of 393 samples drawn from management and applied psychology research. In doing so, we uncover nuances in the associations between seeking behaviors and work outcomes (e.g., in‐role performance and creativity). We discuss how our theorizing and findings challenge, refine, and extend the existing knowledge concerning seeking behaviors at work, provide methodological and practical recommendations, and identify directions for future research.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/peps.12579

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 178 · Cited by 15

Authors
Sherf, E. N., Gilliam, N., & McElroy, T.
Affiliations
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
  • Kenan‐Flagler Business School University of North Carolina Chapel Hill North Carolina USA
Corresponding author
Sherf, Elad N.
Venue
Personnel Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2023-03-01
Volume
77
Issue
2
Pages
847-890
ISSN
  • 0031-5826 (ISSN-L)
  • 1744-6570
OpenAlex
W4319790280
Cited by
15
References
178
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1
FWCI
4.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Personnel Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Human Resource Development and Performance Evaluation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Team Dynamics and Performance
Keywords
Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory, feedback seeking, information seeking, help-seeking, advice seeking, in-role performance, creativity, work outcomes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review