Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 36

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Historic redlining and health outcomes: A systematic review

Kraus, Noa T., Connor, Sarah, Shoda, Krista, Moore, Scott Emory, Irani, Elliane·2024·Public Health Nursing
DOI 10.1111/phn.13276
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this systematic review was to synthesize the existing literature on the associations between historic redlining and modern‐day health outcomes across the lifespan. Method: This review searched PubMed and CINAHL for peer‐reviewed, data‐based articles examining the relationship between historic redlining and any health outcome. Articles were appraised using the JBI critical appraisal checklist. The results were synthesized using a narrative summary approach. Results: Thirty‐six articles were included and focused on various health outcomes, including cardiovascular outcomes, breast cancer incidence and mortality, firearm injury or death, birth‐related outcomes, and asthma outcomes. Most of the included articles ( n = 31; 86%) found significant associations between historic redlining and adverse health outcomes such as increased cardiovascular disease, higher rates of preterm births, increased cancer incidence, reduced survival time after breast cancer diagnosis, and increased firearm injury incidence. Discussion: This review demonstrates the persistent effect of historic redlining on individuals’ health. Public health nurses should recognize redlining as a form of structural racism when caring for affected communities and should advocate for policies and programs that advance health equity. Nurse researchers should develop and test multilevel interventions to address systemic racism and improve health outcomes in communities affected by redlining.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/phn.13276

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Research works printed but not linked: 58

  1. 10.1161/circulationaha.123.064215 · DOI
  2. 10.1016/j.injury.2020.06.042 · DOI
  3. 10.1093/jnci/djad034 · DOI
  4. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2021, Racism and health
  5. 10.1007/s11524‐023‐00725‐y · DOI
  6. 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.22727 · DOI
  7. 10.1097/sla.0000000000005195 · DOI
  8. 10.1371/journal.pone.0036392 · DOI
  9. 10.1016/j.healthplace.2022.102927 · DOI
  10. 10.1111/ppe.12935 · DOI
  11. Grant E. J., 2020, ANA condemns racism, brutality and senseless violence against Black communities
  12. 10.1016/j.ophtha.2022.12.005 · DOI
  13. 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.26707 · DOI
  14. 10.1371/journal.pone.0261028 · DOI
  15. 10.1016/j.envint.2022.107551 · DOI
  16. 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.5875 · DOI
  17. 10.1007/s11524‐022‐00703‐w · DOI
  18. 10.1089/env.2017.0031 · DOI
  19. 10.2105/ajph.2020.305656 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1093/aje/kwaa045 · DOI
  21. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114696 · DOI
  22. 10.2105/ajph.2021.306431 · DOI
  23. 10.1177/23998083211039854 · DOI
  24. 10.1007/s12552‐021‐09338‐z · DOI
  25. 10.2337/dc21‐2563 · DOI
  26. 10.1016/j.ssmph.2021.100793 · DOI
  27. 10.1016/j.healthplace.2018.10.004 · DOI
  28. 10.1016/j.ypmed.2022.107207 · DOI
  29. 10.1161/circulationaha.123.064351 · DOI
  30. Mitchell B., 2018, HOLC “redlining” maps: The persistent structure of segregation and economic inequality
  31. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.114989 · DOI
  32. 10.1016/j.jacc.2022.05.010 · DOI
  33. 10.14434/jpea.v1i1.30321 · DOI
  34. 10.1371/journal.pone.0237241 · DOI · Paper page
  35. 10.1016/s2542‐5196(19)30241‐4 · DOI
  36. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, 2021, The Future of Nursing 2020–2030: Charting a Path to Achieve Health Equity
  37. 10.1681/asn.0000000000000165 · DOI
  38. O'Reilly K. B., 2020, AMA: Racism is a threat to public health
  39. 10.1017/s1742058X22000236 · DOI
  40. 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.20908 · DOI
  41. 10.1097/01.naj.0000484231.55116.8e · DOI
  42. 10.1097/01.naj.0000547639.70037.cd · DOI
  43. Popay J., 2006, Guidance on the conduct of narrative synthesis in systematic Reviews, A Product from the ESRC Methods Programme
  44. Rothstein R., 2017, The color of law: A forgotten history of how our government segregated America
  45. Redford G., 2020, AAMC releases framework to address and eliminate racism
  46. 10.17645/up.v7i4.5410 · DOI
  47. 10.1164/rccm.202112‐2707oc · DOI
  48. 10.3389/fpubh.2020.00453 · DOI
  49. 10.1016/s2155‐8256(21)00027‐2 · DOI
  50. 10.1097/sla.0000000000005860 · DOI
  51. 10.1007/s11524‐022‐00665‐z · DOI
  52. 10.2105/ajph.2022.307192 · DOI
  53. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 2022, The National Institute of Nursing Research 2022–2026 strategic plan
  54. 10.1136/ip‐2022‐044700 · DOI
  55. 10.1097/ans.0000000000000157 · DOI
  56. 10.1016/j.apgeog.2021.102445 · DOI
  57. 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2022.106853 · DOI
  58. 10.1093/jncics/pkac016 · DOI

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Kraus, N. T., Connor, S., Shoda, K., Moore, S. E., & Irani, E.
Venue
Public Health Nursing
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2023-12-26
Volume
41
Issue
2
Pages
287-296
ISSN
  • 0737-1209
  • 1525-1446
DOI
10.1111/phn.13276
Cited by
36
References
4
Language
en
Licence
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (vor)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.