Cited by 46Acne and Rosacea Treatments and EffectsDermatologic Treatments and ResearchPhotodynamic Therapy Research Studies

Randomized trial of three phototherapy methods for the treatment of acne vulgaris in C hinese patients

Liu, Li‐Hong, Fan, Xin, An, Yu‐Xi, Zhang, Jin, Wang, Cong‐Min, Yang, Rong‐Ya·2014·Photodermatology, Photoimmunology & Photomedicine

Abstract

Summary: Background and Aims: Acne vulgaris is common in A sian populations. We compared three methods of phototherapy for the treatment of moderate to severe facial acne vulgaris in C hinese patients. Methods: Patients were randomly assigned to receive photodynamic therapy (PDT), intense pulsed light (IPL) or blue–red light‐emitting diode (LED) phototherapy to the right side of the face until the inflammatory lesion count reduced by ≥ 90%. Patients were examined at 1 and 3 months after the final treatment. Results: We enrolled 150 patients (92 males; mean age, 28 years). At 1 month, ≥90% clearance or moderate improvement occurred in 46/50 (92%), 29/50 (58%) and 22/50 (44%) patients in the PDT, IPL and LED groups, respectively (mean number of sessions required, PDT: 3 ± 1.52; IPL: 6 ± 2.15; LED: 9 ± 3.34). Forty‐six (92%) patients experienced mild to moderate pain, erythema and edema after PDT, which resolved within 5–7 days. Slight erythema and stinging were reported immediately after IPL and LED, resolving within 2 h. After 3 months, minimal papules and pustules were observed in 4 patients in the PDT group, 7 in the IPL group and 12 in the LED group, but no nodular pustules recurred. Conclusions: Phototherapy is efficacious for moderate to severe facial acne vulgaris.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/phpp.12098

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Liu, L., Fan, X., An, Y., Zhang, J., Wang, C., & Yang, R.
Affiliations
  • The Military General Hospital of Beijing PLA (CN)
  • Department of Dermatology General Hospital of Beijing Military Region of PLA Beijing China
Corresponding author
Yang, Rong‐Ya
Venue
Photodermatology, Photoimmunology & Photomedicine
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-01-06
Volume
30
Issue
5
Pages
246-253
ISSN
  • 0905-4383 (ISSN-L)
  • 1600-0781
OpenAlex
W1600477218
Cited by
46
References
41
Citations by year
2025: 7 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1
FWCI
3.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Photodermatology Photoimmunology & Photomedicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Acne and Rosacea Treatments and Effects
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Dermatologic Treatments and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Photodynamic Therapy Research Studies
Keywords
acne, phototherapy, photodynamic therapy, intense pulsed light, facial acne, treatment efficacy, adverse effects, Chinese patients
MeSH terms
Acne Vulgaris, Adolescent, Adult, Female, Humans, Male, Phototherapy, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review