Cited by 14Psoriasis: Treatment and PathogenesisDermatology and Skin DiseasesCutaneous lymphoproliferative disorders research

Psoriasis and daily low‐emission phototherapy: effects on disease and vitamin D level

Open access
Franken, Sylvie Mireille, Witte, Birgit, Pavel, Stan, Rustemeyer, Thomas·2015·Photodermatology, Photoimmunology & Photomedicine

Abstract

Background/Purpose: Hospital‐based phototherapy is a widely accepted treatment modality in psoriasis patients. It, however, requires several hospital visits weekly, interfering with (school)work. Home ultraviolet (UV) treatment has been proven effective before but is only available in certain countries, and safety aspects play a part in reluctancy to prescribe this treatment. Patients, however, are usually keen on the use of phototherapy as it is effective and gives them the possibility of reducing the amount of topical treatment needed. In this study, we assess the effectivity of a low‐emission UV device used daily. Methods: Sixty‐two patients were treated for 6 months either with daily low‐emission UV treatment and mometasone ointment 0.1% or with mometasone ointment 0.1% alone. Psoriasis severity scores, quality of life, vitamin D level, and blood pressure were monitored every 2 months during the study. Results: Patients treated with daily low‐emission UV treatment showed a significant improvement in psoriasis severity, quality of life, amount of steroid ointment used, and vitamin D levels. Conclusion: Daily low‐emission UV therapy is an effective treatment for psoriasis patients, diminishing the amount of steroid ointment needed and improving disease activity, quality of life, and vitamin D scores. Further investigation, however, is necessary.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/phpp.12151

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Repeated low-dose UVR promotes photoadaptation, increases the skin inflammation threshold, and reduces susceptibility to sunburns.

    “Yet, several studies suggest that repeated lowdose UVR promotes photoadaptation, increase the skin inflammation threshold, and reduce susceptibility to sunburns (de Winter et al, 2001;Franken et al, 2015;Laihia et al, 2005).”

    From Effect of Repeated Low-Dose UVR Exposure on Skin Inflammation Threshold, Skin Biomarkers, and Vitamin D in Healthy Adults (2025) · cites this paper as Franken et al, 2015

    Materials and Methods (page unavailable) describes daily low-dose UVB exposure, and the Discussion (page unavailable) reports that treated patients did not report redness or sunburn. Neither passage assesses photoadaptation, a change in the skin’s inflammation threshold, or reduced susceptibility to sunburn; absence of sunburn during treatment does not establish those effects. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • This pattern is consistent with suppression of both Th1 and Th2 responses after phototherapy in atopic dermatitis, likely due to induction of T-cell apoptosis.

    “This pattern is consistent with the suppression of both T helper 1 and T helper 2 responses after phototherapy in atopic dermatitis, likely due to the induction of T-cell apoptosis (Franken et al, 2015;Musters et al, 2021;Ozawa et al, 1999).”

    From Effect of Repeated Low-Dose UVR Exposure on Skin Inflammation Threshold, Skin Biomarkers, and Vitamin D in Healthy Adults (2025) · cites this paper as Franken et al, 2015

    The Abstract and Patients sections describe phototherapy in psoriasis, not atopic dermatitis. Searches for Th1/Th2 suppression and T-cell apoptosis found no passage in our copy addressing the claimed immune response or mechanism. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Franken, S. M., Witte, B., Pavel, S., & Rustemeyer, T.
Affiliations
  • Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
  • Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics VU University Medical Center Amsterdam The Netherlands
  • Department of Dermatology Mauritskliniek Treatment Centre Utrecht The Netherlands
Corresponding author
Franken, Sylvie Mireille
Venue
Photodermatology, Photoimmunology & Photomedicine
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-12-03
Volume
31
Issue
2
Pages
83-89
ISSN
  • 0905-4383 (ISSN-L)
  • 1600-0781
OpenAlex
W1584286285
Cited by
14
References
11
Citations by year
2025: 5 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2
FWCI
0.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Photodermatology Photoimmunology & Photomedicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Amsterdam UMC (VU Amsterdam) - Institutional Repository (publishedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Psoriasis: Treatment and Pathogenesis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Dermatology and Skin Diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Cutaneous lymphoproliferative disorders research
Keywords
psoriasis, home phototherapy, topical corticosteroids, vitamin D levels, psoriasis severity, quality of life, blood pressure, steroid-sparing therapy
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Psoriasis, Quality of Life, Ultraviolet Therapy, Vitamin D

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review