Cited by 51Pain Management and Opioid UsePain Management and TreatmentAnesthesia and Pain Management

The Use of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) in a Major Cancer Center for the Treatment of Severe Cancer-Related Pain and Associated Disability

Loh, Jeffrey, Gulati, Amitabh·2015·Pain Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cancer pain is difficult to treat, often requiring a multimodal approach. While medication management remains the mainstay for the treatment of cancer pain, medications are often associated with undesired side effects. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) provides a potential adjunctive method for treating cancer pain with minimal side effects. OBJECTIVE: Few studies have been performed evaluating the efficacy of TENS on cancer pain. We sought to examine the usefulness of TENS on all cancer patients and to specifically look at the use of TENS as a goal-directed therapy to improve functionality. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. METHODS: Since 2008, patients with chronic cancer pain and on multimodal pain regimens were trialed with TENS. Those patients who showed an improvement in pain symptoms or severity were educated about and provided with a TENS unit for use at home. Pain symptoms and scores were monitored with the visual analog scale (VAS), the numerical rating pain (NRP) scale, and Short-Form McGill Questionnaire at the start of TENS treatment and at 2 months follow-up. RESULTS: TENS proved beneficial in 69.7% of patients over the course of 2 months. In TENS responsive patients, VAS scores decreased by 9.8 on a 0-100 mm scale (P < 0.001), and NRP scores decreased by 0.8 on a 1-10 scale (P < 0.001). LIMITATIONS: Lack of placebo and lack of blinding of physician and patient. CONCLUSIONS: TENS provides a beneficial adjunct for the treatment of cancer pain, especially when utilized as a goal-directed therapy.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/pme.12038

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • TENS-responsive patients decreased pain intensity scores by a mean of 9.8 on a 0-100 mm scale.

    “One recent study showed that TENS proved beneficial in 70 % of patients over the course of 2 months and that TENS-responsive patients decreased pain intensity scores by a mean of 9.8 on a 0–100 mm scale [55].”
  • In one study, TENS proved beneficial in 70% of patients over the course of 2 months.

    “One recent study showed that TENS proved beneficial in 70 % of patients over the course of 2 months and that TENS-responsive patients decreased pain intensity scores by a mean of 9.8 on a 0–100 mm scale [55].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. 4 Searle RD, Bennett MI, Johnson MI. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) for cancer bone pain. J Pain Symptom Manage 2009;37(3):424-8.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Loh, J., & Gulati, A.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US)
Corresponding author
Gulati, Amitabh
Venue
Pain Medicine
Published
2015-06
Volume
16
Issue
6
Pages
1204-1210
ISSN
  • 1526-2375 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-4637
OpenAlex
W1693345708
Cited by
51
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
1.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Pain Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Opioid Use
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Anesthesia and Pain Management
Keywords
transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation, cancer pain, chronic pain, multimodal pain management, pain-related disability, functional improvement, home-based pain management
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Child, Transcutaneous Electric Nerve Stimulation, Female, Disabled Persons, Persons with Disabilities, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasms, Pain, Pain Measurement, Retrospective Studies, Severity of Illness Index, Cohort Studies, Treatment Outcome, Young Adult, Pain Management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review