Cited by 62Opioid Use Disorder TreatmentElectronic Health Records SystemsPain Management and Opioid Use

How, why, and for whom do emergency medicine providers use prescription drug monitoring programs?

Open access
Smith, Robert J., Kilaru, Austin S., Perrone, Jeanmarie, Paciotti, Breah, Barg, Frances K., Gadsden, Sarah M., Meisel, Zachary F.·2015·Pain Medicine

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The prescription opioid epidemic is currently responsible for the greatest number of unintentional deaths in the United States. One potential strategy for decreasing this epidemic is implementation of state-based Prescription Drug Monitoring Programs (PDMPs), which are designed for providers to identify patients who "doctor shop" for prescriptions. Emergency medicine physicians are some of the most frequent PDMP users and opioid prescribers, but little is known about how they actually use PDMPs, for which patients, and for what reasons. METHODS: We conducted and transcribed semistructured qualitative interviews with 61 physicians at a national academic conference in October 2012. Deidentified transcripts were entered into QSR NVivo 10.0, coded, and analyzed for themes using modified grounded theory. RESULTS: There is variation in pattern and frequency of PDMP access by emergency physicians. Providers rely on both structural characteristics of the PDMP, such as usability, and also their own clinical gestalt impression when deciding to use PDMPs for a given patient encounter. Providers use the information in PDMPs to alter clinical decisions and guide opioid prescribing patterns. Physicians describe alternative uses for the databases, such as improving their ability to facilitate discussions on addiction and provide patient education. CONCLUSION: PDMPs are used for multiple purposes, including identifying opioid misuse and enhancing provider-patient communication. Given variation in practice, standards may help direct indication and manner of physician use. Steps to minimize administrative barriers to PDMP access are warranted. Finally, alternative PDMP uses should be further studied to determine their appropriateness and potentially expand their role in clinical practice.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/pme.12700

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 18 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [20]Charmaz K Grounded theory: Objectivist and constructivist methods Denzin N Lincoln Y Handbook of qualitative research 2nd Thousand Oaks CA Sage Publications 2000 509 535

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Smith, R. J., Kilaru, A. S., Perrone, J., Paciotti, B., Barg, F. K., Gadsden, S. M., & Meisel, Z. F.
Affiliations
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
  • Highland Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Meisel, Zachary F.
Venue
Pain Medicine
Published
2015-06
Volume
16
Issue
6
Pages
1122-1131
ISSN
  • 1526-2375 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-4637
OpenAlex
W1925308565
Cited by
62
References
18
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 7
FWCI
10.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Pain Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Funders
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (5 R18 HS021956)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Opioid Use
Keywords
prescription drug monitoring programs, emergency physicians, opioid prescribing, prescription opioid epidemic, opioid misuse, doctor shopping, clinical decision-making, provider-patient communication, patient education, administrative barriers
MeSH terms
Adult, Congresses as Topic, Emergency Medicine, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Physicians, Surveys and Questionnaires, Substance Abuse Detection, Drug Monitoring, Prescription Drugs, Inappropriate Prescribing, Prescription Drug Misuse

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review