Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 311

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 65 of the 65 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

From Planning to Implementation: Top‐Down and Bottom‐Up Approaches for Collaborative Watershed Management

Koontz, Tomas M., Newig, Jens·2014·Policy Studies Journal

Abstract

Collaborative approaches are increasingly used to address challenging environmental problems in the U nited S tates and around the world. The inclusion of multiple stakeholders and sources of information is expected to solve such problems. Prior research has highlighted the importance of collaborative process characteristics in reaching agreements and building social capital, but less is known about what factors affect the implementation of such agreements. A parallel stream of research in policy implementation theory has developed variables and frameworks to explain the implementation of authoritative policy prescriptions. Drawing on the top‐down/bottom‐up perspectives on implementation, this study examines implementation of collaborative recommendations along a continuum of top‐down/bottom‐up approaches. A comparison of six cases in two states (L ower S axony,G ermany and O hio,U nited S tates) indicates important differences in perceptions of implementation and environmental improvements, although whether an effort was more top down or more bottom up was not a key determinant of results. In both states, stakeholder collaborative planning efforts included substantial involvement from stakeholders and multiple government agencies and levels. Participants in the O hio cases perceived higher levels of implementation and environmental improvements. Key factors promoting implementation of plan recommendations were resources (funding and a full‐time coordinator), willing land owners, and networks. In the L ower S axony cases, collaborative plans were seen as less impactful, but nevertheless the process of plan development did foster networks for implementing some actions to improve water quality.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/psj.12067

Cites

65 of 65 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 65 references

Cited by

See all 311

Metadata

Authors
Koontz, T. M., & Newig, J.
Venue
Policy Studies Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-08
Volume
42
Issue
3
Pages
416-442
ISSN
  • 0190-292X (ISSN-L)
  • 1541-0072
OpenAlex
W1654855394
Cited by
311
References
65
FWCI
49.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: From Planning to Implementation: Top‐Down and Bottom‐Up Approaches for Collaborative Watershed Management. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/psj.12067
The paper
Koontz, T. M., & Newig, J. (2014). From Planning to Implementation: Top‐Down and Bottom‐Up Approaches for Collaborative Watershed Management. Policy Studies Journal. https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12067

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.