An Introduction to Polycentricity and Governance
Open accessAbstract
Since the early discussions of polycentricity, the concept (and variations such as polycentric political systems, polycentric governance, polycentric order, etc.) has seen the development of numerous permutations, digressions, and contradictions. This chapter is meant to carefully step through key notions tied to polycentricity and polycentric governance. The chapter’s purpose is to discuss polycentric governance in particular, while giving some attention to polycentricity as a term from which polycentric governance originates. We build upon the classic version of polycentric governance as a 'polycentric political system', link this concept with broader conceptualizations of polycentricity, and survey the related ideas that have been investigated around the concepts of polycentric political systems, polycentric order, polycentric governance, and polycentric arrangements.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A polycentric governance system emerges from the fact that, although all clusters remain relatively independent from each other, when it comes to making decisions, they necessarily account for what the others are doing.
“A polycentric governance system emerges from the fact that, although all clusters remain relatively independent from each other, when it comes to making decisions, they necessarily account for what the others are doing [100]; p. 29).”
From Blockchain as a confidence machine: The problem of trust & challenges of governance (2020) · cites this paper as [100]
In a polycentric system, interdependence among a web of actors leads to a common set of rules, norms and strategies that guide the behaviour of a large majority of actors within the system.
“According to Polanyi [96]; the particularity of a polycentric system, is that, as a result of the interdependence between this web of actors, a common set of rules, norms and strategies emerge to guide the behaviour of a large majority of actors within the system [100]; p. 40).”
From Blockchain as a confidence machine: The problem of trust & challenges of governance (2020) · cites this paper as [100]
Cites
A General Framework for Analyzing Sustainability of Social-Ecological Systems
Ostrom, E. (2009) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1172133 · Cited by 8,656 · see citing works
Comparative Economic Organization: The Analysis of Discrete Structural Alternatives
Williamson, O. E. (1991) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393356 · Cited by 7,151 · see citing works
Effects of externally mediated rewards on intrinsic motivation.
Deci, E. L. (1971) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0030644 · Cited by 4,170 · see citing works
Deci, E. L. (1975) · doi:10.1007/978-1-4613-4446-9 · Cited by 2,911 · see citing works
Scale and Cross-Scale Dynamics: Governance and Information in a Multilevel World
Cash, D. W., Adger, W. N., Berkes, F., Garden, P., Lebel, L., Olsson, P., Pritchard, L., & Young, O. (2006) · Ecology and Society · doi:10.5751/es-01759-110208 · Cited by 2,254 · see citing works
Toward a Comparative Institutional Analysis
Aoki, M. (2001) · doi:10.7551/mitpress/6867.001.0001 · Cited by 1,480 · see citing works
Crawford, S. E. S., & Ostrom, E. (1995) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.2307/2082975 · Cited by 1,362 · see citing works
Polycentric Systems of Governance: A Theoretical Model for the Commons
Carlisle, K., & Gruby, R. L. (2019) · Policy Studies Journal · doi:10.1111/psj.12212 · Cited by 745 · see citing works
The Political Economy of Cross-Scale Networks in Resource Co-Management
Adger, W. N., Brown, K., & Tompkins, E. L. (2005) · Ecology and Society · doi:10.5751/es-01465-100209 · Cited by 524 · see citing works
Complex Causal Relations and Case Study Methods: The Example of Path Dependence
Bennett, A., & Elman, C. (2006) · Political Analysis · doi:10.1093/pan/mpj020 · Cited by 455 · see citing works
Selecting Appropriate Cases When Tracing Causal Mechanisms
Beach, D., & Pedersen, R. B. (2018) · Sociological Methods & Research · doi:10.1177/0049124115622510 · Cited by 198 · see citing works
It's all about mechanisms – what process-tracing case studies should be tracing
Beach, D. (2016) · New Political Economy · doi:10.1080/13563467.2015.1134466 · Cited by 174 · see citing works
Marshall, G. R. (2009) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.10.008 · Cited by 147 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Blockchain as a confidence machine: The problem of trust & challenges of governance
De Filippi, P., Mannan, M., & Reijers, W. (2020) · Technology in Society · doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101284 · Cited by 406 · see citing works
- Authors
- Stephan, M., Marshall, G., & McGinnis, M.
- Venue
- Governing Complexity
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Published
- 2019-09-30
- Pages
- 21-44
- OpenAlex
- W2974108063
- Cited by
- 112
- References
- 13
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 3
- FWCI
- 112.99
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Locations
- Cambridge University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Digital Library Of The Commons Repository (Indiana University) (submittedVersion)
- RUNE (Research UNE) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (1431487)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Systems and Governance
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Globalization and political ideologies
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Theory and Democracy
- Keywords
- polycentricity, polycentric governance, governance theory, political system theory
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review