The DOI matches its Crossref record; 95 of the 95 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Collective Leadership and Context in Public Administration: Bridging Public Leadership Research and Leadership Studies
Abstract
This article challenges the view that public leadership research should maintain a separate perspective in the study of public leadership. It discusses the benefits of further embedding the public leadership research domain within leadership studies, constructing a cross‐fertilization that contributes to advance both. The article maps key concerns in relational leadership theories, contrasting them with current work in the public leadership research domain and offering suggestions to close the gap. It highlights public leadership scholarship's competitive advantage to contribute to theorizing about leadership, given the importance of context for building contemporary theories of relational leadership.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Collaborative Governance in Theory and Practice
Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008) · Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory · doi:10.1093/jopart/mum032 · Cited by 8,256
Graen, G. B., & Uhl-Bien, M. (1995) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/1048-9843(95)90036-5 · Cited by 7,299
Bass, B. M., & Riggio, R. E. (2006) · doi:10.4324/9781410617095 · Cited by 4,812
An Integrative Framework for Collaborative Governance
Emerson, K., Nabatchi, T., & Balogh, S. (2012) · Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory · doi:10.1093/jopart/mur011 · Cited by 3,637
Complexity Leadership Theory: Shifting leadership from the industrial age to the knowledge era
Uhl-Bien, M., Marion, R., & McKelvey, B. (2007) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2007.04.002 · Cited by 2,318
Distributed leadership as a unit of analysis
Gronn, P. (2002) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/s1048-9843(02)00120-0 · Cited by 2,059
Relational leadership theory: exploring the social processes of leadership and organizing
Uhl-Bien, M. (2006) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2006.10.007 · Cited by 1,973
Towards a theory of leadership practice: a distributed perspective
SPILLANE, J. P., HALVERSON, R., & DIAMOND, J. B. (2004) · Journal of Curriculum Studies · doi:10.1080/0022027032000106726 · Cited by 1,805
(2011) · Cited by 1,736
Shared Leadership: Reframing the Hows and Whys of Leadership
Pearce, C., & Conger, J. (2003) · Sage eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781452229539 · Cited by 1,732
Cited by
(2020) · OECD Working Papers on Public Governance · doi:10.1787/ed8235c8-en · Cited by 499
Metadata
- Authors
- Ospina, S. M.
- Venue
- Public Administration Review
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2016-12-21
- Volume
- 77
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 275-287
- ISSN
- 0033-3352 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-6210
- OpenAlex
- W2563326835
- Cited by
- 319
- References
- 95
- FWCI
- 27.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Collective Leadership and Context in Public Administration: Bridging Public Leadership Research and Leadership Studies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/puar.12706
- The paper
- Ospina, S. M. (2017). Collective Leadership and Context in Public Administration: Bridging Public Leadership Research and Leadership Studies. Public Administration Review. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12706
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.