The DOI matches its Crossref record; 79 of the 79 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A review of the nutrition and feeding management of farmed tilapia throughout the culture cycle
Abstract
Tilapia is the second most farmed fish group worldwide and over the past decade has quadrupled in production, largely due to their many characteristics conducive to aquaculture conditions as well as to the high marketability and relatively stable market prices. To keep pace with this rapid expansion, tilapia aquaculture will rely increasingly on more sustainable practices, but this must not be at the expense of decreased productivity, increased cost or compromised product quality. Since feed constitutes the major operating cost of tilapia farming, understanding their nutritional requirements, factors that may influence these requirements and implementing the most appropriate feeding management strategy is essential for the continued sustainability and scalability of the global tilapia industry. This review addressed these concerns by providing an overview of published nutrient requirement data and offered practical recommendations to the nutrition and feeding management of farmed tilapia, from broodstock to finishing feeds. The first section of this review extensively discusses the dietary protein/amino acids, lipids/fatty acids, carbohydrates, vitamin and mineral requirements of tilapia. Alternatives to marine‐based ingredients, which are used increasingly in tilapia feeds, are also discussed. This is followed by discussing practical feed management aspects at the commercial farm level including feed formulations, feed types and feeding rates/frequency throughout the culture cycle. Recent research indicating significant differences in nutrient requirements and utilization efficiencies of improved tilapia strains versus non‐improved strains are highlighted. This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of tilapia nutrition and thus contributes to the continued global expansion of tilapia farming and the demand for their products.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Nutrient Requirements of Fish and Shrimp
(2011) · National Academies Press eBooks · doi:10.17226/13039 · Cited by 3,192
Francis, G., Makkar, H. P. S., & Becker, K. (2001) · Aquaculture · doi:10.1016/s0044-8486(01)00526-9 · Cited by 2,320
Tacon, A. G. J., & Metian, M. (2008) · Aquaculture · doi:10.1016/j.aquaculture.2008.08.015 · Cited by 2,104
Fish oil replacement in finfish nutrition
Turchini, G. M., Torstensen, B. E., & Ng, W. (2009) · Reviews in Aquaculture · doi:10.1111/j.1753-5131.2008.01001.x · Cited by 1,241
Self-citationEffect of broodstock nutrition on reproductive performance of fish
Izquierdo, M. S., Fernández-Palacios, H., & Tacon, A. G. J. (2001) · Aquaculture · doi:10.1016/s0044-8486(01)00581-6 · Cited by 1,075
Utilization of dietary carbohydrate by fish
Wilson, R. P. (1994) · Aquaculture · doi:10.1016/0044-8486(94)90363-8 · Cited by 849
Savino, J. F., & Stein, R. A. (1982) · Transactions of the American Fisheries Society · doi:10.1577/1548-8659(1982)111<485:isadno>2.0.co;2 · Cited by 798
Alternative dietary protein sources for farmed tilapia, Oreochromis spp.
El-Sayed, A.-F. M. (1999) · Aquaculture · doi:10.1016/s0044-8486(99)00159-3 · Cited by 507
Fish Oil Replacement and Alternative Lipid Sources in Aquaculture Feeds
(2010) · CRC Press eBooks · doi:10.1201/9781439808634 · Cited by 505
Non-starch polysaccharides and their role in fish nutrition – A review
Sinha, A. K., Kumar, V., Makkar, H. P. S., De Boeck, G., & Becker, K. (2011) · Food Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2011.02.042 · Cited by 467
Cited by
Devic, E., Leschen, W., Murray, F., & Little, D. C. (2018) · Aquaculture Nutrition · doi:10.1111/anu.12573 · Cited by 184
Yildirim-Aksoy, M., Eljack, R., Schrimsher, C., & Beck, B. H. (2020) · Aquaculture Reports · doi:10.1016/j.aqrep.2020.100373 · Cited by 77
Wang, J., Wang, Y., Gu, Z., Mou, H., & Sun, H. (2023) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.163061 · Cited by 50
Metadata
- Authors
- Ng, W., & Romano, N.
- Venue
- Reviews in Aquaculture
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2013-03-24
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 220-254
- ISSN
- 1753-5123 (ISSN-L)
- 1753-5131
- OpenAlex
- W2076305714
- Cited by
- 287
- References
- 79
- FWCI
- 15.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.