Cited by 0Biblical Studies and InterpretationHistorical and Linguistic StudiesArchaeology and Historical Studies

Retelling Scripture: “The Jews” and the Scriptural Citations in John 1:19‐12:15. By RuthSheridan. Biblical Interpretation Series 110. Leiden: Brill, 2012. Pp. xvi + 294. Cloth, $151.00.

Open access
Keith, Chris·2013·Religious Studies Review

Abstract

of three major figures: Montaigne, Francis Bacon, and Gassendi.In his revealing treatment of Montaigne's Lucretius, Passannante writes, "Not even an Epicurean confidence could save the DRN from its own self-fulfilling prophecy."This judgment is prompted by Montaigne's notes to his Lucretius and can be paraphrased as Quot lectores tot Lucretii.In a strange way, this attitude of relativity is Epicurean and can be summed up in Epicurus's principle of multiple possible explanations (e nd cetai pleonacw ˜ς).There are many passages in The Lucretian Renaissance where the attitude of the multiple possible interpretations of the DRN might be expressed by the French critical term mise en abyme, that is, the plunging of the meaning of a text into an abyss.The Gutenberg Galaxy created by the invention of moveable type generated this abyss (pp.120-22 of Passannante's Homer Atomized).This is exactly what happened to the text of Catullus as its fate is described in Michelle Loverick's The Floating Book.Habent sua fata libelli.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/rsr.12012_10

Cites

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

0 of 1 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

    • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 34
    • May combine two claims. 10
    • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

      Findingnone given

      Starling's book is aimed at a high level of research and offers critical analysis of several key Pauline issues rather than general discussion.

      “This book is intended for a high level of research and does not cover general discussion of various topics but offers critical analysis of several key Pauline issues.”
      Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

      Findingnone given

      Waetjen brings Romans into dialogue with contemporary political philosophers such as Derrida, Žižek, Badiou, and Agamben.

      “Waetjen brings Romans into conversation with contemporary political philosophers, such as Derrida, Z ˇiz ˇek, Badiou, and Agamben.”
      Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

      Findingnone given

      Ware's book is an unchanged paperback reprint of his 2005 volume.

      “This book is an unchanged paperback reprint of Ware's 2005 volume, The Mission of the Church in Paul's Letter to the Philippians in the Context of Ancient Judaism (NovTSup 120; Leiden: Brill).”
      Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

      Findingnone given

      Katos's book is the first monograph devoted to the life, work, and thought of Palladius of Helenopolis.

      “This is the first monograph devoted to the life, work, and thought of the Christian bishop and author, Palladius of Helenopolis (c.363-430).”
      Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

      Findingreasoning

      Waetjen's approach leads him to attend to readers' subjective experiences of the text.

      “Doing so causes Waetjen to pay attention to readers' subjective experiences in engaging the text.”
      Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

      Findingnone given

      Most of Heil's subdivisions rest on linguistic usage, with repetition of particular words determining the arrangement.

      “Most of the subdivisions are based on linguistic usage where the repetition of particular words determines the arrangement.”
      Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

      Findingnone given

      Heil sets nine criteria that the macro- and micro-chiasms must meet.

      “He holds himself to a high standard, setting nine rigorous criteria to which the macroand micro-chiasms must conform if the perceived chiasms are to be anything more than a subjective arrangement of the text.”
      Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

      Findingnone given

      Heil proposes three macrochiastic structures for Hebrews.

      “He offers three macrochiastic structures.”
      Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

      Findingnone given

      Schenke and his doctoral students published numerous important editions and monographs that are standard to this day.

      “He and his doctoral students published numerous important editions and monographs that are standard to this day.”
      Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

      Findingnone given

      The second part of Wischmeyer's volume contains chapters that examine the context, structure, content, audience, and impact of 1 Thessalonians, 1 and 2 Corinthians, Galatians, Philippians, Philemon, and Romans.

      “Part 2 is the backbone of the book, with chapters analyzing the context, structure, content, audience, and impact of 1 Thessalonians, 1 and 2 Corinthians, Galatians, Philippians, Philemon, and Romans.”
      Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

      Findingnone given

      Sheridan's study does not give full weight to the passages in John where 'Jews' respond positively to Jesus (8:30-31; 11:45), and this gap weakens the book's overall argument.

      “Unfortunately, Sheridan does not fully consider the presence of those “Jews” who respond positively to Jesus in the Johannine narrative (8:30-31; 11:45), a deficiency that nags the overall argument of the volume.”
      Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
      • Rests on an assumption: A study of the characterization of 'the Jews' in John 1:19-12:15 should account for the passages where 'Jews' respond positively to Jesus.
    • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

      Findingnone given

      Waetjen's commentary combines historical-critical, social-scientific, and postmodern hermeneutical approaches in its reading of Romans.

      “The commentary combines a historical-critical, social-scientific, and a specifically postmodern hermeneutic in its reading of Romans.”
      Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

      Findingnone given

      She presupposes that the audience of Hebrews is Jewish and fits his interpretation to that assumption without arguing for it from Hebrews itself.

      “Presupposing that the audience of Hebrews is Jewish, he fits his interpretation of the sermon to that assumption without making the case for it from exegesis of Hebrews itself.”
      Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

      Findingreasoning

      McNicol reads Revelation as a unity and favors a 'plain' reading, which leads him to overlook scholars such as Tina Pippen.

      “McNicol tends to argue for a “plain,” “ordinary,” or “standard” reading of the text, which suggests that other readings are obtuse or abnormal and assumes unity in Revelation, which causes him to ignore some recognized Revelation scholars like Tina Pippen.”
      Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

      Findingnone given

      The scholars involved in the Infancy Gospels project promote the use of the term 'infancy gospels' to designate the entire corpus of stories relating to Jesus's birth and childhood.

      “The scholars involved in this project promote the use of the term”
      Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

      Findingnone given

      As an English translation of a German original, Wischmeyer's volume makes the perspectives of several German scholars available to students who do not read German.

      “As an English translation of the German original, another key benefit is that it makes available the perspectives of a number of German scholars to non-German speaking students.”
      Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

      Findingnone given

      Stevick treats John 13-17 as the literary unit of the Farewell Discourse, even though Johannine scholars do not agree on what material constitutes it.

      “Yet Stevick assumes the Farewell Discourse as a literary unit to be contained in chapters 13-17, but since Johannine scholars are not unified on what material constitutes John's Farewell Discourse, this choice is interesting.”
      Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

      Findingnone given

      Wischmeyer's volume is written for advanced undergraduate and graduate students.

      “It is written for advanced undergraduate and graduate students, and will be most useful in courses on the life and letters of Paul.”
      Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

      Findingnone given

      Svendsen's work posits that Philo's influence on Hebrews extended to hermeneutics, specifically scriptural exegesis.

      “Unlike previous studies of the Philonic influence on Hebrews, which restrict themselves to Philo's language, cosmology, and theology, Svendsen's work posits that the influence extended to hermeneutics, specifically scriptural exegesis.”
      Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

      Findingnone given

      In the past two decades, scholarly interest in Palladius and his writings has grown, especially after the critical editions of his History and Dialogue.

      “In the past two decades, scholarly interest in Palladius and his writings has grown, especially after the critical editions of his History and Dialogue, works that heavily influenced subsequent Christian historiography and ascetical literature.”
      Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

      Findingnone given

      Chamberlain's lexicon treats transliterations, proper names, and place names that the main LXX lexicons of Lust, Eynikel, and Hauspie and of Muraoka do not cover.

      “His treatment of this last category of words is helpful because he deals with transliterations, proper names, and place names, which the main LXX lexicons by Lust, Eynikel, and Hauspie, and by Muraoka, do not cover.”
      Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

      Findingnone given

      Almost every page of Reynolds's book contains block quotes, often of works unavailable in English.

      “Almost every page contains block quotes, often of works unavailable in English.”
      Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

      Findingcitation

      Wischmeyer's volume is organized in three parts and offers a comprehensive introduction to Paul's life and work.

      “This book, divided into three parts, provides a thorough introduction to Paul's life and work.”
      Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

      Findingnone given

      Waetjen argues for an early dating of Romans, treating it as the first of Paul's extant letters.

      “More controversial is Waetjen's arguments for an early dating of Romans, especially as the first of Paul's extant letters.”
      Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

      Premisenone given

      Palladius is a key source of information for early Christian asceticism, spirituality, and pilgrimage, and for the lives of John Chrysostom, Theophilus of Alexandria, and Evagrius of Pontus.

      “Palladius is a key source of information for early Christian asceticism, spirituality, and pilgrimage, and for the lives of John Chrysostom, Theophilus of Alexandria, and Evagrius of Pontus.”
      Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

      Premisenone given

      There is little evidence of Jewish mission consciousness.

      “A strength of the book is the way it deals with questions raised by the well-known phenomenon of Gentile conversion even though there is little evidence of Jewish mission consciousness.”
      Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

      Interpretationnone given

      Bird has applied aspects of feminist, postcolonial, and materialist interpretation to 1 Pet rather than developing a new methodology.

      “Bird's new approach is eclectic, and although she claims to have developed a new methodology out of three previously employed methods, she has actually applied aspects of feminist, postcolonial, and materialist interpretation to 1 Pet.”
      Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

      Premisenone given

      Modern Orthodox conceptions of the doctrine of deification, beginning with Meyendorff, presuppose a distinction between God's essence and energy.

      “Beginning with J. Meyendorff, modern Orthodox conceptions of the doctrine of deification presuppose a distinction between God's essence and energy.”
      Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
      • cites J. Meyendorff

        Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

      Interpretationreasoning

      Given the variety of proposed arrangements for Hebrews, the subjective element in discovering chiasms likely cannot be fully eliminated.

      “Given the variety of arrangements for Hebrews that have been proposed in the past, it is likely that one cannot completely eliminate the subjective element in discovering chiasms.”
      Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

      Interpretationreasoning

      Young's thesis that oral tradition is the source of Jesus traditions in the Apostolic Fathers may be unfalsifiable.

      “To put it a bit differently, Young's thesis may be unfalsifiable.”
      Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

      Interpretationreasoning

      She overvalues Exodus texts such as 3:14 and 31:18-34:35 in Hebrews, giving them a greater role than the author of Hebrews does.

      “He also overvalues Exodus texts like 3:14 and 31:18-34:35 in Hebrews, giving them a greater role than the author of Hebrews does.”
      Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

      Interpretationnone given

      Alonso is right that the Syrophoenician woman pericope (Mk 7:24-30) belongs within Mark's larger 'bread section' (6:31-8:26).

      “He is certainly correct that this encounter must be situated and viewed within the larger “bread section” of the Markan narrative (6:31-8:26).”
      Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

      Interpretationnone given

      Stevick's exegesis rests on a revised form of Martyn's two-level reading of John.

      “This exegetical decision shows Stevick's reliance upon a modified version of Martyn's two-level reading of John.”
      Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

      Interpretationnone given

      Philip's critique of Kristeva is really a critique of biblical scholars who adopt her methodology rather than of Kristeva's methodology itself.

      “The critique of Kristeva, however, is really a critique of biblical scholars who adopt her methodology rather than Kristeva's methodology itself.”
      Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    34 of 34
    • The paper relies on this without support.

      A study of the characterization of 'the Jews' in John 1:19-12:15 should account for the passages where 'Jews' respond positively to Jesus.

      “Unfortunately, Sheridan does not fully consider the presence of those “Jews” who respond positively to Jesus in the Johannine narrative (8:30-31; 11:45), a deficiency that nags the overall argument of the volume.”
    1 of 1

    Authors
    Keith, C.
    Affiliations
    St Mary's University Twickenham London (GB)
    Corresponding author
    Keith, Chris
    Venue
    Religious Studies Review
    Publisher
    Wiley
    Published
    2013-03
    Volume
    39
    Issue
    1
    Pages
    37-37
    ISSN
    • 0319-485X (ISSN-L)
    • 1748-0922
    OpenAlex
    W2018481841
    Cited by
    0
    References
    0
    FWCI
    0.00
    Type
    journal article
    Language
    en
    Open access
    Locations
    Religious Studies Review (publishedVersion)
    Topics
    • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Biblical Studies and Interpretation
    • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Historical and Linguistic Studies
    • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Archaeology and Historical Studies
    Keywords
    Gospel of John, biblical citations, Jews, Johannine prologue

    About these checks

    Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

    Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-05.

    Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-05.

    Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

    Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

    What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

    Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review