Cited by 16Interpreting and Communication in HealthcareTranslation Studies and PracticesCultural Competency in Health Care

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

'I had to stifle my feelings' - bilingual health professionals translating for family members in a healthcare setting. A qualitative study

Open access
Nielsen, Dorthe Susanne, Abdulkadir, Leila Saud, Lynnerup, Camilla, Sodemann, Morten·2020·Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences

Abstract

Background: As an alternative to a professional interpreter, children or relatives often act as so‐called ‘language brokers’ in the healthcare sector. Litterature have demonstrated that the cultural context is significant for the potential outcome for child language brokers. For individuals from a collectivistic family pattern, it becomes natural and is often regarded as respectful, to assist older relatives day and night. Aim: Very little is known about young people providing informal translation services in a Scandinavian context. We therefore aimed to capture the lived experiences of bilingual health professionals, students and postgraduates who have experienced interpreting for family members in a healthcare setting. By interviewing bilingual health professionals, we aimed to obtain two perspectives, the translators and the professionals, in one interview. Results: Analysing the conditions, meanings and reasoning, it became possible for us to understand the young translators’ situations and how their life conditions affected their reasons for action in certain ways and in certain conditions. The analysis revealed four main themes: (i) the importance of social relations and cultural conditions; (ii) the hidden burden of consequences for participants’ health conditions due to the focus on health‐related consequences and emotionally difficult situations experienced by the participants; (iii) participants experienced limitations in language skills as a challenge; and (iv) being ‘in between’ in the encounter with the professional system. Conclusion: When family members interpret for the family, the family interpreter is at risk of being excluded by the family or being exposed to and involved in highly sensitive dilemmas that may forever impair normal family relations: health professionals should be aware of this and take professional responsibility.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/scs.12800

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Studies document increased anxiety and depression among child language brokers exposed to parental medical problems and asylum proceedings.

    “The literature supports this concept, with studies documenting increased anxiety and depression among child language brokers exposed to parental medical problems and asylum proceedings [12].”

    From Interpreter Child Syndrome Leading to Parentification and Anxiety in a Refugee Girl: A Case Report (2025) · cites this paper as [12]

    The Author Manuscript reports that childhood language brokering in healthcare can be associated with increased depression and serious anxiety. It also describes the emotional difficulty of interpreting relatives’ medical diagnoses. Our copy does not connect those outcomes to exposure to asylum proceedings. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 30 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Tolman CW, 2006, Critical Psychology, 1

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Nielsen, D. S., Abdulkadir, L. S., Lynnerup, C., & Sodemann, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Southern Denmark (DK)
  • Odense University Hospital (DK)
Corresponding author
Nielsen, Dorthe Susanne
Venue
Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2019-12-12
Volume
34
Issue
4
Pages
929-937
ISSN
  • 0283-9318 (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-6712
OpenAlex
W2996688471
Cited by
16
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2
FWCI
2.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Southern Denmark Research Portal (University of Southern Denmark) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Interpreting and Communication in Healthcare
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Translation Studies and Practices
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Cultural Competency in Health Care
Keywords
language brokers, children as interpreters, lived experience, emotional burden, interpersonal relationships, family relationships, professional responsibility, healthcare communication
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Animals, Child, Delivery of Health Care, Emotions, Family, Humans, Stifle, Translating

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review