Cited by 54Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesHealth disparities and outcomesDeath Anxiety and Social Exclusion

Longitudinal relationships between positive affect, loneliness, and suicide ideation: age-specific factors in a general population

Bennardi, Marco, Caballero, Francisco Félix, Miret, Marta, Ayuso‐Mateos, Jose Luis, Haro, Josep Maria, Lara, Elvira, Arensman, Ella, Cabello, Maria·2019·Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior

Abstract

The aims of this study were to analyze whether positive and negative affect, social support, and loneliness are factors longitudinally related to suicide ideation in the general population in different age groups. A total of 2,392 individuals from a nationally representative sample of the Spanish general population were evaluated in 2011–2012 and in 2014–2015. After including relevant control variables in the analyses, lower positive affect was prospectively related to ideation in 18‐ to 59‐year‐old individuals, whereas feelings of loneliness were related to ideation in 60‐year‐and‐older individuals. Social support was not associated with suicide ideation in any age group. These results are in line with the need for age‐tailored suicide prevention programs. The present findings might also suggest that health care professionals should consider feelings of loneliness rather than social support to assess the presence of suicide ideation in older people.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/sltb.12424

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bennardi, M., Caballero, F. F., Miret, M., Ayuso‐Mateos, J. L., Haro, J. M., Lara, E., Arensman, E., & Cabello, M.
Affiliations
  • University College Cork (IE)
  • Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Salud Mental (ES)
  • Department of Psychiatry School of Medicine Universidad Autónoma de Madrid Madrid
Venue
Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-12-06
Volume
49
Issue
1
Pages
90-103
ISSN
  • 0363-0234 (ISSN-L)
  • 1943-278X
OpenAlex
W2774160225
Cited by
54
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3
FWCI
3.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Hispana (submittedVersion)
  • Biblos-e Archivo (Universidad Autónoma de Madrid) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007–2013, 316795, FP7/2007‐2013, 223071)
  • Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación (ACI2009‐1010)
  • Instituto de Salud Carlos III (PS09/00295, PS09/01845, PI12/01490, PI13/00059)
  • European Regional Development Fund (PI12/01490, PI13/00059)
  • Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Salud Mental
  • Ministerio de Educación, Cultura y Deporte (FPU13/03573)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
Keywords
suicidal ideation, positive affect, loneliness, social support, age differences, older adults, suicide prevention, negative affect, general population
MeSH terms
Suicide Prevention, Adult, Affect, Age Factors, Aged, Female, Humans, Loneliness, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Middle Aged, Preventive Psychiatry, Surveys and Questionnaires, Risk Factors, Social Support, Spain, Suicide, Suicidal Ideation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review